Laila Mickelwait of exodus cry was caught sharing child porn.
(mobile.twitter.com)
Comments (35)
sorted by:
Well, this dude's screen name ain't gonna win him any friends.
But yeah, many such cases. I think the people who scream about this stuff the loudest are ones who actually partake in the deviancy, and then feel guilt or shame over what they are watching and project their anger onto others. Like people who only associate "anime videos" with porn, because they are the ones watching hentai all the time.
Also Vice sure does love their "Japan is weird and fucked up" articles. They once had a writer visit to explore services like maid cafes, rent-a-dates, and hostess clubs. Those services aren't really sexual but like a creeper he kept trying to get the girls to fuck him. I'm sure Vice reporters love going on sex tours around Japan before going home to report how misogynistic the country is.
Kishida forcing doctors to disclose myocarditis risk from the shot and allow informed decisions by banning vax mandates pissed off all the feminist propaganda networks into a rage against Japan.
This is mostly true, Japan went around the 'covid vaccines are perfectly safe' narrative and didn't trust the Science but it's not just the femoids, it's also the Science community too. They tried SUPER hard to debunk the 'Japan is using hydroxychloroquine' narrative when NHK, Their own version of the CDC and Asia Times have all reported its use in ENGLISH.
"You're not really scared of spiders, you just wanna fuck 'em!"
The notion that anyone who strongly advocates against cartoon kiddy fucking media is secretly a pedo is an awfully convenient defense for the pedos.
There is a difference between fear and obsession.
In example, I spend probably 0% of the average day thinking about trapdoor spiders, chainsaw murderers, or the concept of a wood splinter being lodged in that space between your fingernails. That number goes up if I am directly confronted with the object in question or a situation alluding to it, of course, but on an average day, I don't think about them.
Those are quite nasty stuff, there is merit in bringing them up, but in any given conversation, I'm not going to. Because they aren't on my mind. They don't occupy my brainspace. It is an interesting thought exercise to think of things I don't think about.
Someone who often brings up a concept without prompt... It is natural to assume it is occupying a significant amount of their brainspace. Their free time is spent thinking about it. Now, not everyone who spends every waking hour thinking about something is actually obsessive about it in a societally negative way, but a much larger fraction of them will be, than the average person to whom the concept does not occur at all.
The person on the street corner screaming at passers-bys "don't give into the urge to kill people who wear green ties! Resist the urge!" is much more likely to wind up being a murderer of someone who wears green ties, than the guy walking by him saying "fuck off, nutter".
Normally I'd agree but we've seen it's more true than not the past 5 years.
Maybe. Seems to happen a lot with prominent figures in the media, which is all Jew controlled, and leads me more to believe that Jewish people are and like people that are pedophiles.
I never saw the point of child porn or weird legal porn where people pretend to be related and crazy extreme shit, but maybe I should be thankful for that. I know some 17-20 year olds that grew up in the age of free porn everywhere and they’re all kinds of fucked up already. Pretty sad. One of my friends confessed to me one time that he did kind of have a masturbation problem and I asked him how often he did it and he said once a week or once every two weeks. I just laughed. Some of those kids I know are basically always dick-in-hand. Porn really is ruining a lot of people.
Noticed all the kiddy touchers and sex pests after GamerGate. Like 70% of anti-GG, especially the male feminist types, all got into trouble for possession or sexual harassment/assault....Or got busted being cucks/closet fags.
Seems like postmodern/SJW people in general are typically into depraved weird sex stuff. It’s never the best looking people, either, it’s usually the weirdo looking ones or fugly folk. That Zoe Quinn chick that blew it all up was at best average looking at the time, which in their realm I guess is a 20/10. Now she’s straight fugly, at her height having been a creepy 5-6. Seems like an actually hot chick could clean up in the gaming industry if she was riding to the top on cock.
By weird I don’t even mean things like BDSM or role playing or anything, either. It’s always furry shit or 5 year olds being raped to death. I mean seriously, why? Sex on it’s own is pretty great. Maybe have someone wear an outfit or smack their ass or do it somewhere new. How do you get to the point where a baby needs to die while you wear a rabbit tail for you to finish? I don’t even see that as on the spectrum of sex. It’s like the Seinfeld episode where George ate during sex and sandwiches started making him horny.
Sex addiction leads to wanting more and dirtier shit while adding that to the fact all these types are very insular and degen to begin with so they're all going from vanilla straight to hardcore bdsm orgies so they look for more illicit forms of degeneracy. Same thing with porn coomers, they go from Playboy to Girls Gone Wild to Hardcore pseudo rape porn to "help me step brother" to blacked.
Yes you're talking about the "homophobes are gay" trope, and that's not what I'm saying that at all. You can reasonably argue against a lot of that loli stuff. I'm just pointing out a pattern I've seen. The same pattern with those male feminists always having something hidden in their closet.
And you have to admit even with people complaining about gays, the stereotype fits sometimes. From creepy fundamentalist preachers meeting dudes in the park, to gangsta rappers and their homies on the down low. The loud hypocrites are the first ones we notice.
That's the problem with child porn. If you come across it or someone producing it then if you try to report it to law enforcement or any sort of proper authority there's a non-trivial chance you having come across it would implicate yourself. It was technically on your computer on some level, even if for a fleeting moment.
These are muggle laws: So you can't exactly pop Hunter Biden for something like this and expect it to stick.
A mutual friend—now estranged—gave another friend a hard drive way back with a bunch of pirated games and movies and such on it. Among that was a bunch of stuff that’s basically kiddy porn and some of it even weirder. He thought he was doing him a favor or something, or maybe it was a joke, we didn’t know. No longer in touch with that guy.
I imagine things like that happen more than you’d think. Then there’s the YouPorn kind of sites out there that used to freely let people post their own community porn that largely got purged after PornHub realized Hunter Biden had an account with videos of girls that were most likely underaged on there. On a technical level, there’s probably a lot more underaged porn out there than people realize. If a girl looks mature enough and is pretty, but legally can’t work yet, and grows up with that stuff being glamorized, it’s only natural that would happen. Probably very common among Asian girls in porn since they typically look younger forever.
Legally it’d be a nightmare to deal with all that. They’ve probably even had girls like that in ads on pornsites or something, so technically people probably had images of naked underaged girls having sex on their computer in a mostly involuntary way too.
Public acceptance of pornography and masturbation in general was a bad idea. I see no real upside to it. Some of the girls used to make decent money but if they’re hot enough and great at sex they could have just been trophy wives or something. I don’t think it should be illegal but a return to shame would only be productive.
Not just this. People have been arrested for buying a hard drive online for building a computer, finding child porn and reporting it to the police. Hell Nick Rekieta straight up says that if you inadvertently find or see child porn on a hard drive, drop the drive in bleach, set it on fire, use it as target practice at the range, burn it again then bury the ashes because the ways the laws are set up can fuck you as well.
There are cases of people getting busted for receiving unsolicited CP produced from disturbed minors.
And the minors getting busted as well for pornographing themselves.
Man, if I were to see any CP, which I didn't, I'd be outta there. Fuck that.
The reason pornhub sucks now, that's who.
No, that's Hunter Biden
Btw, she is talking about Tsutomu Miyazaki, the "Otaku Killer" in that article
The thing is, said sociologists also blamed slasher films since the killer collected them too, that is in part why japan is so adverse to gore and dismemberments (Resident Evil is censored, Mortal Kombat is banned, etc).
Not to mention the background of mental issues he had, he was also a vampirist, necrophile and cannibal
the King of 2ch, then.
Reported: This post contains promotion of violence.
Post Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Post Approved: No it isn't.
It is promoting a violent act, this falls directly under rule 2
No it isn't. It's identifying that an individual claimed that an act of violence occurred.
And posting it falls under promotion per legal definition. Crappy verbiage doesn’t make an exemption.
That's not true. A material is not "promoted" because it is reported on. You are basically saying that the news promotes murder every time they report on it. Again, I don't think you're being genuine about this, because this is a fundamentally unreasonable perspective.
Which it does, promoting violence is not a legal definition of violent advocation. Once again imminence and production are required for it to be considered advocacy. Glorification and promotion are objectively far different than advocacy.
Advocacy and glorification are not part of any laws on violence in the US that I'm aware of, particularly in the way you are using it. Imminence is irrelevant because it is not possible for imminent threats to occur online as far as I'm aware.
You are making a bad-faith interpretation of the rules, and then trying to re-define words to suit your argument by trying to inject legalese when it suits you.
You're not making an honest argument.
Comment Reported for: Being a retard
Comment Approved: I don't approve of Ahaus spilling this out into other threads, but it's also on me for engaging with it, so I'm sorry.