Laila Mickelwait of exodus cry was caught sharing child porn.
(mobile.twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
No it isn't. It's identifying that an individual claimed that an act of violence occurred.
And posting it falls under promotion per legal definition. Crappy verbiage doesn’t make an exemption.
That's not true. A material is not "promoted" because it is reported on. You are basically saying that the news promotes murder every time they report on it. Again, I don't think you're being genuine about this, because this is a fundamentally unreasonable perspective.
Which it does, promoting violence is not a legal definition of violent advocation. Once again imminence and production are required for it to be considered advocacy. Glorification and promotion are objectively far different than advocacy.
Advocacy and glorification are not part of any laws on violence in the US that I'm aware of, particularly in the way you are using it. Imminence is irrelevant because it is not possible for imminent threats to occur online as far as I'm aware.
You are making a bad-faith interpretation of the rules, and then trying to re-define words to suit your argument by trying to inject legalese when it suits you.
You're not making an honest argument.
Comment Reported for: Being a retard
Comment Approved: I don't approve of Ahaus spilling this out into other threads, but it's also on me for engaging with it, so I'm sorry.