The "War on Women" agenda is ramping up in preparation for the mid-terms. #MoreFeminineWay
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
(Laughs in Soros)
I’m honestly surprised that society applauds chemical castration of children
Wait until post-birth abortion, followed by the selling of the baby's organs. It'll be marketed as a great financial tool for struggling women. The extreme lowering of legal sex age may come before or after that, to achieve total commoditization of children.
There was a time when I would’ve called you paranoid. Not anymore
I was with you until the second half.
I don't understand.
The second part is unrealistic.
You don't think lowering the age of consent is a goal? It may take an extra generation or two down the slope, but it'll most likely happen.
No, I don't. I think it's a distraction narrative.
Did anyone predict the rise of Money's transgenderism logic? No, they all said the slippery slope would lead to pedophiles - but that's the method used to control most of their plants, why would they legalise it?
Hmm. It does make sense, but it's not congruent with the spirit of Babylon. It's not all just about power. It may end up that way, but it begins as a will to create Heaven on Earth, with no suffering and with all earthly pleasures. This is the original motivation of the totalitarian, which always ends in nothing but power. As the old die, the new generation of power mongers will shift this agenda forward, even if a little. In a world where all base pleasures are offered, renting a kid for sex would be there too. That is why I say it will be legal, though I don't know how long it'll take. We may not live to see it, thank God.
Society applauds anything women want it to.
Why not shoot them instead?
Demons belong in hell, not on my planet.
based, but you created this problem.
Fucking hell. Poor kid...
I'm guessing this is recent, but ConPro are retarded enough to post old shit.
I'm not downplaying what happened to the poor kid, before someone says it. I hope there is justice, no child deserves that kind of trauma. Unlike our feminist friends, I don't advocate for harming children.
It's the rhetoric. It's escalating, because they need this agenda to work in the midterms.
Right, so the poor kids pushed into it by abusive parents are pedos? The young adults brainwashed into it by a feminized culture?
Or, more likely to trigger Miss Tradthot 2022, the FTM transgenders are pedophiles? Can we have that on record please?
The spin doctors are working overtime to bury that the main pedo involved with transgenderism was feminist ally Dr John Money, who was openly a pedophile but the hatred of feminists towards males was more powerful than their desire to protect children.
These people are dumb as hell. Everyone they don't like is 'literally a pedo' to them. Welcome to the other half of the horseshoe.
I don't disagree, but stupidity isn't the full story.
I had an old post where someone asked me to predict what would happen in the second half of 2021. One of the predictions was "feminist plants on the right will escalate transgender rhetoric massively in the hope of getting into power after the midterms."
Didn't the Supreme Court ruling say that Congress had to pass the next mandate bill if they wanted it to have a hope of standing?
There's the endgame.
Congress doesn't want the mandate, they want control of willing sheep. Demoralizing and disenfranchising the 'right wing' to keep them from ever participating again in their lifetimes is their goal. It leaves the sheep and welfare queens (illegals included) to help vote for and implement their agendas like blue cities. If you don't have an insurgent population fighting you, it's cheaper and easier to maintain your control.
Why is that?
So the mandate is just to make them accept the boot in their mouth out of defeat? I don't think that makes sense - how many people wouldn't be at all involved in politics if the vaccine wasn't around?
You've got to understand one thing for any of what has been happening to make sense: the vast majority of people are non-confrontational, especially when life stable within certain levels of existence, IE poor to lower middle class. Making sweeping changes upsets their neutral nature. How you disguise the real changes you want to make is not keeping this neutral nature as much as possible, but kicking them in the direction of a certain target. If you phrase the 'kick' in the right way, you can get people to do all the distracting and even helping you make these changes.
This is how they were able to get rid of Trump. The vast majority of people didn't want Trump and what he was doing for them gone, they wanted the divisiveness, the anger and bile being spewed everywhere gone. It was laid at Trumps feet because he was a single, easy target to focus on and the fact he's a loud mouthed asshole from New York. Oh people fucking hate New Yorkers. It was easy to turn people against him, it was easy to use their same democrat cheating tactics and republican attempts at cheating against them, and with the legitimate wins for Biden, Trump was out of office. Trump making that stupid fucking rally date (whether he came up with it or was suggest to him) played right into their hands and gave them all the ammo they ever needed to purge him from the internet and politics forever.
As for why any of this: If you can crush the populace, and make them police themselves, you won't ever have to deal with them let alone acknowledge they exist. They want themselves to be the new aristocracy in glass towers, catered to and separate.
Why would that trigger traditionalists?
It's criticism of women.
Then again, they'll just frame it as testosterone caused it.
This is just marketing. Female victims illicit more sympathy than men from society as a while. The right-wing (her demographic) literally think trans are pedos. This is wrong and a way over simplication of the problem but it gets voters. She's a grifter. She's just going to say whatever she thinks will boost her support. She's not concerned with addressing the real problems.