Same, game looks amazing but now that they opened up the door to crybullies complaining the game's not gonna be worth it, people will complain more and other stuff will be censored...mark my words.
That happened on an Oprah Winfrey show decades ago when Super Soaker water guns were all the rage. The guests talked bout how dangerous and toxically masculine water pistols were, and proposed alternatives of what looked like animal squeak toys that shot water. And everyone in the audience applauded.
They can pry my old Super Soaker 2000 from my cold dead hands. I will never throw it out; it's just too bad-ass looking and delivers on its promise of soaking my enemies with water.
What makes it worse it's already well known that gamepress don't drive or generate as much revenue than word of mouth. if anything getting shitted on any of the game journos is positive marketing.
Yeah, the proper response would have been "fuck you, grow a sense of humor", or not replying at all. Instead we got "well, you see, good SJW overlords, uhm, uhh, those were, umm, pre-existing art assets, just placeholders, they were going to be changed soon no matter what I assure you! Nothing is supposed to make anyone feel any emotions in our games! That would be bad! We promise to Build Back Better! Don't hurt us game journos, we're bent over for you!"
What a shame. I was going to get this, being a huge fan of SWAT3 and 4.
Same, game looks amazing but now that they opened up the door to crybullies complaining the game's not gonna be worth it, people will complain more and other stuff will be censored...mark my words.
"That rifle looks a lot like a killing machine. Not cool. Should be replaced with banana. Will then be better for children."
That happened on an Oprah Winfrey show decades ago when Super Soaker water guns were all the rage. The guests talked bout how dangerous and toxically masculine water pistols were, and proposed alternatives of what looked like animal squeak toys that shot water. And everyone in the audience applauded.
They can pry my old Super Soaker 2000 from my cold dead hands. I will never throw it out; it's just too bad-ass looking and delivers on its promise of soaking my enemies with water.
To be fair, you have to be retarded to even consider going to the Oprah show
"... cold dead wet hands."
When will devs stop listening to these whiny disingenuous fags; they're not even remotely the target demographic for this type of game JFC
What makes it worse it's already well known that gamepress don't drive or generate as much revenue than word of mouth. if anything getting shitted on any of the game journos is positive marketing.
Exactly - a smart dev would take whatever the journos are saying about a game as being the complete opposite of what the real fans would say.
This really gets the ol' noggin joggin'.
dead on arrival
Art assets. A medical facility had a box labelled "red pills". Oh the horror. Twits on Twitter upset.
Yeah, the proper response would have been "fuck you, grow a sense of humor", or not replying at all. Instead we got "well, you see, good SJW overlords, uhm, uhh, those were, umm, pre-existing art assets, just placeholders, they were going to be changed soon no matter what I assure you! Nothing is supposed to make anyone feel any emotions in our games! That would be bad! We promise to Build Back Better! Don't hurt us game journos, we're bent over for you!"