I really hate this. Every one of them is like "Stop using Facebook, stop using Twitter, etc.", but they are always the first ones to post things on them, and they always post on FB/Twitter before posting on anything else (and then complain they've been suspended or banned, what the fuck else did you expect?). How the fuck do you expect people to move away from Twitter if you yourself keep using it every single day.
It's funny, they wouldn't even have to stop using Twitter completely in a way. Use the strength of your enemy against itself, all you have to do is bring people to other stuff by saying stuff like "I posted something super funny on [website], go check it out", and eventually people will naturally follow just by curiosity. Once people realize the internet is more than just Facebook and Twitter, maybe things will change.
I'm sorry but conservatives need to stop using Twitter, a far left website period. They need to start putting their money where their mouth is.
True this. The house and senate are also disrespectful to conservatives, so it would be good to leave those too. And sometimes in public people are jerks. Just stay indoors and dont participate in daily life because some shitlibs are out there👌
In the same vein, but slightly off topic: My niece posted one of those stupid fucking womenism updated for the modern era "If non-womb having people had a period, it would last only for a day. Tell me I'm wrong." She supports Trump and leans right of center, but is Gen Z. I am tired of worthless Trannies and the mental adjustments people make for them so as not to offend anyone.
I corrected her (men) and told her she was wrong. That feminist shit was funny 50 years ago when gynecologist was still a taboo word. Now, it's tired and sexist to a degree I won't tolerate from someone not trying for humor.
But twitter is a private company that can do what it wants because they aren't actually that powerful and important. - Retarded leftist with a donkey smile.
True, but they enjoy special legal protection as a "platform" under section 230. They can't be sued for content they host that's posted by users.
I think, rather than building parallel infrastructure and creating separate echo chambers, this problen would be better attacked by adding a requirement for 230 protection: public platforms can only remove content if it violates their states terms of service (at the time of posting) and they need to be legally liable if they remove content arbitrarily.
If it were just a matter of twitter being a public platform, I would agree with you. However, if that were true, it would be liable for all the cp it hosts, which it isn't due to government intervention. If they want to be arbiters of content, they should be liable for everything they host.
Instead, they should use one of the following social media platforms not run by leftists:
I really hate this. Every one of them is like "Stop using Facebook, stop using Twitter, etc.", but they are always the first ones to post things on them, and they always post on FB/Twitter before posting on anything else (and then complain they've been suspended or banned, what the fuck else did you expect?). How the fuck do you expect people to move away from Twitter if you yourself keep using it every single day.
It's funny, they wouldn't even have to stop using Twitter completely in a way. Use the strength of your enemy against itself, all you have to do is bring people to other stuff by saying stuff like "I posted something super funny on [website], go check it out", and eventually people will naturally follow just by curiosity. Once people realize the internet is more than just Facebook and Twitter, maybe things will change.
True this. The house and senate are also disrespectful to conservatives, so it would be good to leave those too. And sometimes in public people are jerks. Just stay indoors and dont participate in daily life because some shitlibs are out there👌
Never forget who these people are
In the same vein, but slightly off topic: My niece posted one of those stupid fucking womenism updated for the modern era "If non-womb having people had a period, it would last only for a day. Tell me I'm wrong." She supports Trump and leans right of center, but is Gen Z. I am tired of worthless Trannies and the mental adjustments people make for them so as not to offend anyone.
I corrected her (men) and told her she was wrong. That feminist shit was funny 50 years ago when gynecologist was still a taboo word. Now, it's tired and sexist to a degree I won't tolerate from someone not trying for humor.
Nope. She's done similar shit, hates Rowling, but I've not seen her use this level of retardedness.
shes right leaning? it sounds like shes making fun of trannys bruh lmao
That's so mangled I can't even tell what it means any more.
It means if men had periods, we'd find a way to be as whiny as they are.
She's never heard of kidney stones.
I wonder what pissed off bleeder deleted that.
I love that what I say breaks Rule 16, but calling women bleeders is woke and correct.
Hey, trans women bleed too!
Just for different reasons …
As usual, Trump was on the Right Side of History.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks (x2)
Comment Approved: He thinks it does, but it actually doesn't.
But twitter is a private company that can do what it wants because they aren't actually that powerful and important. - Retarded leftist with a donkey smile.
Just build your own internet!
NO NO NOT A DRUMPF INTERNET NNOOOOOO
Can they ban all blacks?
In before "that's different!"
True, but they enjoy special legal protection as a "platform" under section 230. They can't be sued for content they host that's posted by users.
I think, rather than building parallel infrastructure and creating separate echo chambers, this problen would be better attacked by adding a requirement for 230 protection: public platforms can only remove content if it violates their states terms of service (at the time of posting) and they need to be legally liable if they remove content arbitrarily.
If it were just a matter of twitter being a public platform, I would agree with you. However, if that were true, it would be liable for all the cp it hosts, which it isn't due to government intervention. If they want to be arbiters of content, they should be liable for everything they host.
No they cant. Thats where you're wrong, kiddo.
I honestly never would have thought I'd see a day when they open pushed genital mutilation of your children in the US like this.
It's just straight up evil.
I don't think people simp in porn. You want to talk about simp propaganda, look at TV and movies.
Matt Walsh appears to be up on Twatter
https://twitter.com/MattWalshBlog