It's amazing how many on the right will ride to the TERFs' defense over the tranny problem that they're responsible for creating. They'll eventually find that the alliance comes with a knife in the back. I'm all for exterminating predatory troons, but only the ones that target men and children. The straight ones need to be allowed to inconvenience women to the point where they use their social power to end the problem for good.
Yeah, I don't follow the nonsense too closely. I just know she's crossed the trans cult despite going along with a lot of feminist bullshit in the past. My point is that anyone who goes along with this hateful ideology right up until it fucks with something they care about doesn't deserve any sympathy when the monster they've unleashed on the world comes for them. This applies whether you want label her a TERF or not.
There is a not a feminist today that isn't radical, feminism is a raidical idealogy by design. That said, you may be right that JK Rowling isn't radical in comparison to feminism's standard crazies.
The Rowling shitstorm is possibly the definitive case of the left eating its own in hilarious fashion. Nothing more. You don't run to her defense, you grab popcorn.
No. The enemy of my enemy is my enemy's enemy. Maybe a useful ally for a time, but never a friend. This sort of attitude is what allowed the Soviets to become as powerful as they were after WWII.
It's amazing how many on the right will ride to the TERFs' defense over the tranny problem that they're responsible for creating. They'll eventually find that the alliance comes with a knife in the back. I'm all for exterminating predatory troons, but only the ones that target men and children. The straight ones need to be allowed to inconvenience women to the point where they use their social power to end the problem for good.
I don't think Just Kidding was ever "radical".
Her "exclusionarism" is also limited to places like prisons.
Yeah, I don't follow the nonsense too closely. I just know she's crossed the trans cult despite going along with a lot of feminist bullshit in the past. My point is that anyone who goes along with this hateful ideology right up until it fucks with something they care about doesn't deserve any sympathy when the monster they've unleashed on the world comes for them. This applies whether you want label her a TERF or not.
I mean, she was never a "radical feminist". She doesn't even have female protagonists.
There is a not a feminist today that isn't radical, feminism is a raidical idealogy by design. That said, you may be right that JK Rowling isn't radical in comparison to feminism's standard crazies.
They call anyone who's not metaphorically and increasingly also literally sucking off trannies a "radical". As in that new acronym, "TER".
The Rowling shitstorm is possibly the definitive case of the left eating its own in hilarious fashion. Nothing more. You don't run to her defense, you grab popcorn.
Meh - The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
ALL alliances and relationships are based upon the weighting of pros vs cons to achieve a desired outcome.
Ideological purity rarely succeeds on its own and that's why we have the Republican form of government to argue it out.
No. The enemy of my enemy is my enemy's enemy. Maybe a useful ally for a time, but never a friend. This sort of attitude is what allowed the Soviets to become as powerful as they were after WWII.
yep. Should have nuked the Reds. (I include China in that). Nuke and pave. Literally.