Yeah, I don't follow the nonsense too closely. I just know she's crossed the trans cult despite going along with a lot of feminist bullshit in the past. My point is that anyone who goes along with this hateful ideology right up until it fucks with something they care about doesn't deserve any sympathy when the monster they've unleashed on the world comes for them. This applies whether you want label her a TERF or not.
There is a not a feminist today that isn't radical, feminism is a raidical idealogy by design. That said, you may be right that JK Rowling isn't radical in comparison to feminism's standard crazies.
I don't think Just Kidding was ever "radical".
Her "exclusionarism" is also limited to places like prisons.
Yeah, I don't follow the nonsense too closely. I just know she's crossed the trans cult despite going along with a lot of feminist bullshit in the past. My point is that anyone who goes along with this hateful ideology right up until it fucks with something they care about doesn't deserve any sympathy when the monster they've unleashed on the world comes for them. This applies whether you want label her a TERF or not.
I mean, she was never a "radical feminist". She doesn't even have female protagonists.
There is a not a feminist today that isn't radical, feminism is a raidical idealogy by design. That said, you may be right that JK Rowling isn't radical in comparison to feminism's standard crazies.
They call anyone who's not metaphorically and increasingly also literally sucking off trannies a "radical". As in that new acronym, "TER".