Two of them simply tried to detain a moronic burglar who’d been robbing their neighbour hood and one was simply there and recorded the moron grabbing a shotgun and getting himself shot. Now they all get to spend the rest of their life in prison. The blacks are given free reign to commit every evil there is while whites are treated like subhumans by the nation they built. This nation is doomed and seems to deserve that doom.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (172)
sorted by:
No chance. From what seems to have been presented in court, they were completely fucked. If they needed probable cause to arrest Arbery, then they were fucked.
Instead, they had about as much reason to stop Arbery as Huber had to stop Rittenhouse: not fucking much.
But they didn't stop him. The nog attacked them as he was walking by the truck, suddenly leaping off the pavement to try to grab the gun.
As I recall, they pursued him, then the mayos got out of their truck to arrest him without probable cause. That's where the problem lies. It's felonious act to try and detain them without enough cause to do so.
If you don't like my slur, then you can take yours down, and I'll do the same.
Occam's Razor says otherwise. I don't believe that they found a jogger and assumed without justification that he was a thief and completely by coincidence it was the thief known as The Jogger. Either they are psychic, or they had probable cause.
He wuz a good boy, he dindu nuffin.
Just ignore his felony history and claiming he's just jogging.
Joggers gonna jog...
Probable Cause is a very specific thing. The police need less than that to pull you over. They need that to actually cuff you and arrest you.
That's a lot. In fact, that's so much, they could have had the police get an open warrant for the guy and had him arrested on sight. But that's not what seemed to have happened.
They were trying to detain him, not arrest. But I don't see why it matters. In fact, if everyone had survived, the guys could have gone on trial for unlawful detention, maybe assaulting with a weapon. In a case like this, you get one story: the one told by the survivor. We had a video, but it was shitty (by which I mean it didn't show the only important things that you would have wanted to see). That story was that Arbery attacked first, and nothing I read showed that story even challenged. IANAL. In my mind, if you are attacked and fight back, it's self defense. The law must be different, because all that seemed to matter was whether they had a right to be chasing the guy in the first place.
I think I'd allow them both self defense actually. There were so many points that this could have been averted that it amounts to mutual combat to me. I searched today and no one in the lame news seems to have explained the finer points of the law that the jury must have considered.
Under GA law, they lump both detention and arrest together for the purposes of false imprisonment.
Because they were committing a felony themselves (the false imprisonment), they could not assert self defense unless there had bee some sort of break in the sequence of events, which never happened.
What people aren't getting is that there's basically no right to conduct a citizen's arrest in GA, with very narrow exceptions. It doesn't matter under the law that Arbery was also a burglar because the McMichaels admitted that they didn't know that at the time.
This might be pedantic, but I think detaining him would qualify as a "citizen's arrest".
That's the problem. The unlawful detention is a felony. Hence, Arbery's death is Felony Murder.
I actually agree with this. This was basically Colin Noir's position. Which could be reduced to: "If two guys in a truck drive past me, set up a road block, and jump out with guns: I'm dumping rounds on them."
From what the McMichaels were saying, it sounds like they pointed guns at Arbery, and then Arbery attacked them. That attack could absolutely be taken as self-defense... which is where my unease in the situation gets pretty bad. That's a horrifically stupid decision for Arbery that cost him his life, but the attack would have legal. If it were me, and some dude started yelling for me to stop, and pointed a shotgun at me? Then I'd pull a Colin Noir and just start blasting.
Well, someone has to teach the storm fags to chill. I have to make it simple for them.
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs
Comment Approved: I distinctly remember being explicitly told that slurs in general were not against the rules, but that they couldn't be directed at specific people. He seems to be returning the favor.
Heres some probable cause:
The blmer was going around looting constructiin sites and then tried to assualt his victims and steal their gun
The toilet-bowl-fleshed ones didn't have any evidence of any evidence of any active criminal behavior, they just had suspicion that he was engaged in crime. That's not probable cause, certainly not enough to actually stop him at the time.
Go suck off a blm riot you black supremacist trash
Black National Socialism must be destroyed.
If the guy they shot was white, they'd have never been on trial. Remember, this whole thing was going to be swept under the rug because the shooters were friends with the DA or whatever and everyone in town. I mean, I guess you could argue it depends on which white guy they in theory shot. If the guy were rich or famous, perhaps something would have been done. If it was a methhead criminal, I think it would have gone away.
The only reason it went on trial was because of a viral video. The only reason people cared about that video was because it was an interracial crime.
They wouldn't have swept it under the rug because they were white. They would have swept it under the rugs because they were cops.
I said it was because they were cop friends of the DA. The only thing being white has to do with it is being white and cops made this into a civil rights case in the eyes of the public and the Federal jewdicial system. Which got it more attention. Contrary to popular belief white people in Georgia are not immune to policing.
I was actually agreeing with you.
until...
Sigh
I'm just gonna leave it. Close enough.
I didn't watch any of this trial. If what you say is true, and you add the Kyle Rittenhouse acquittal into the mix, our justice system is working basically perfectly. Although i would argue Kyle even being charged at all was a broken system. The politics at the top, and of course the fraudulent lying (((media))), are what needs to be fixed. Seems doable, though I am still not too optimistic.
The system is obviously broken because the Left, particularly Soros and friends, have now become so desperate as to wield prosecutors themselves as a bludgeon.
The only way to inoculate a society from Leftism is to expose it to Leftism, as you would any other disease. Each red pill pushes each person a single step further away from the slave mentality they previously had. Every time you see another injustice, a lie, an act of barbarism rationalized, it only keeps feeding the animosity towards the Left. Until eventually, the whole Leftwing system becomes unpopular, it turns against itself, and it suffers a collapse & preference cascade. They do it all the time.
And enough with the echo-posting. Your enemies aren't jews, they are leftists. You might as well be blaming leagues of white executives for the financial, tech, PR, and HR industries from pushing Leftism and claiming it's a white conspiracy. It's not. The tie between everyone on the Left... is their lust for power through the rationalization of Leftism.
You call conservatives being arrested for wrong thought and self defense while subhuman black supremackst blm/antifa terrorists walk free as "working"? Gtfo to cuba you subhuman communjst scum
Quit being fat. I spoke out against Leftism.
Instead of being black-pilled, understand that a culture war takes time and exposure to a population that has been indoctrinated for at least 2-3 generations.
No, I just know that Judeo-Bolshevism is bullshit. And I'm not going to cry for Palestine.
I'm not so sure about the first, and the 2nd one is absolutely not the case. A lot of the purposes of PR is not to reflect public perception, but to mold and shape it as propaganda.
And yes, I'm following it all the way up to George Soros and Klaus Schwab. A Nazi Collaborator, and what I believe to be the son of a genuine Nazi.
I'll definitely watch Branca's interpretation. The issue is that Tim, Poso & Branca do not seem to be people who are willing to let others talk over them, on a show where everyone talks over each other.
If Branca's got his own vid, that would be better.
That being said, if he's right about the law supporting reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause, that's a huge problem.
However, he's also the one I've heard pooh-pooh the appeals court, so IDK.