posted ago by MrJ4242 ago by MrJ4242 +147 / -6

Two of them simply tried to detain a moronic burglar who’d been robbing their neighbour hood and one was simply there and recorded the moron grabbing a shotgun and getting himself shot. Now they all get to spend the rest of their life in prison. The blacks are given free reign to commit every evil there is while whites are treated like subhumans by the nation they built. This nation is doomed and seems to deserve that doom.

Comments (160)
sorted by:
GeneralBoobs 42 points ago +42 / -0

Meanwhile, niggers egging on crimes, while recording it, and throwing things are ignored by police and celebrated by society.

JustHereForTheSalmon 14 points ago +14 / -0

Mostly peaceful spontaneous one-sided sparring matches

DoritoBlizzardPence 8 points ago +8 / -0

Blm is openly embraced by democrat traitors

elleand202 10 points ago +10 / -0

BLM/Antifa are the military wing of the Democratic Party. Of course they'd be embraced and protected.

The right should embrace and protect our own foot soldiers but we don't. Look at how the January 6 protestors and the Proud Boys are treated.

rentfREEEE_since2016 2 points ago +2 / -0

“Aaaaewww sheeeeit fam! No u stepppin’ foo! I dun beat ur ass nigga! OOO OOOO AAHH AHHH OOGA BOOGA!” 🍌

randomuser88385 42 points ago +56 / -14

Going after Arbery with a gun was a terrible idea. Yes he was a criminal scumbag who attacked the chasers instead of surrendering, but I understand why they were found guilty here.

Agreed on the nation is doomed and deserves it.

deleted 10 points ago +13 / -3
Unknownsailor 79 points ago +80 / -1

Their mistake was to a) record it and b) try to arrest him.

Their third and biggest mistake was to assume that the justice system would take their side. That cannot be assumed by white people. Not any more.

The sooner whites realize that they are living in a foreign occupied land that was taken from them without a shot being fired, the sooner we can come to taking it all back.

It will get worse, a lot worse. Accept it, anticipate it, and prepare for it.

Tourgen 39 points ago +40 / -1

There is a Yahoo news article saying (paraphrased) White Women Birth White Supremacists and Black Women Birth Their Victims.

They are coming for you and your children. They clap and laugh when white women die alone, childless. I see the resentment and anger in their eyes as I go about my day. Things are going to go very bad in the economy over the next 10 years. Get out of the cities if you are able. Do it now. Move. Get a new job.

Smith1980 22 points ago +22 / -0

Yahoo is utter garbage

DefinitelyNotIGN 11 points ago +11 / -0

If it is paid attention to and spread about, it is not garbage, it is toxic waste.

And even if it wasn't your fault it is there, leaving toxic waste sitting around without addressing it is generally considered a bad idea.

Gizortnik 12 points ago +18 / -6

The justice system shouldn't be assumed to take your side ever. That's just fucking stupid. The system has never been just.

No, whites are not in a foreign land, and the sooner you recognize that a shitload of whites are the primary driving force for a lot of this nonsense, the sooner you are going to realize that your dream of racial solidarity doesn't mean shit.

Trippinfall 19 points ago +19 / -0

No whites are forcing blacks to act violently or commit crimes

Gizortnik 10 points ago +15 / -5

That's not true. The eradication of the black family, and the introduction of racial solidarity to create a dependency on a racial socialist state has basically guaranteed violence and criminality. Lots of whites profit off of that because they are Leftists. Lots of Leftist blacks do too. Both white and black Leftists are pushing racial division and animosity because that violence and tension makes blacks a controllable political block to be wielded by the Leftist in charge, regardless of the color.

White Leftists are happy to propagate revolutionary bullshit for their own purposes, just like every other Leftist.

It doesn't matter if they are black or white, because the problem is that they are still red.

DoritoBlizzardPence 13 points ago +13 / -0

Blm is black supremacist, biden preaches black supremacisg garbage. Its blacks burning looting murdering. Its blacks who destroyed everything and get privledges for their skin color like affirmative action while Whitea are dehumanized wifh crt

Gizortnik 5 points ago +5 / -0

BLM is Black National Socialism. Biden preaches it, because it's a useful political tool. Black activists are engaging in burning, looting, and murdering because that is a strategy for their political, racial, violence.

Smith1980 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well said.

ArtemisFoul 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah. Every time u/Gizortnik starts on this spiel I want to tell him he's an idiot because nobody assumes that this is solely the fault of various "minorities", and every time some retard proves me wrong before I even open the thread. It's maddening. I actually wrote three entire longposts trying to explain myself, but I'm not exactly sober so they I ended up just ranting every single time, so I deleted them. Sorry, I'm not exactly sober.

subbookkeeper 6 points ago +6 / -0

It did though, they were investigated initially and no charges were brought.

when_we_win_remember 5 points ago +5 / -0

If the video had shown the actual fight, it might have helped them in court. As is, it basically proved everything the prosecution was alleging without showing what Arbery did immediately prior to getting shot. I do get the point that it might never have been prosecuted, if not for the video.

I would also assert that shots have been fired in this occupation. A great deal of rights were lost around the Civil War, whether you lived in the South or not.

Blue-collar745 3 points ago +4 / -1

Assuming this isn’t a CIA psyop anyway. Wasn’t the father law enforcement or some kind of government employee?

Smith1980 9 points ago +9 / -0

I thought he was a retired cop

Blue-collar745 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yes. It’s reasonable to be skeptical of a case that reaches the mainstream. I still think we should be skeptical of this. It feels like it was done in a way that would confuse everyone. Also the way they filmed it did not help their case. I’m just skeptical if everything nowadays tbh

MargarineMongoose 26 points ago +27 / -1

Why should we have to wait for the cops to defend our communities from evil? Especially when we know that the cops are not a force for good, but simply a force for the State.

Smith1980 9 points ago +9 / -0

Not arguing with you because I’m sure he was up to no good but I’m just saying that I figured they would be found guilty. If I’m not mistaken they had seen him before

ApexVeritas 5 points ago +5 / -0

You're correct. Everyone has the right to defend themselves, their homes, their neighborhood, their town, their people, and their country from attack. If someone suggests otherwise, it means they want to strip you of one of your natural rights, which indicates they're either stupid or malicious, and will take your other natural rights as well.

This is going to become more common too. As our "justice" system has been corrupted, the only way for good people to attain justice is by their own hands. At this point, even though it's considered illegal, it's not immoral or illogical. In this scenario, vigilantism and revolt from the corrupt system is the only righteous path for good people. It's the people taking back power that they abdicated to the state to do for them, but when the state fails in it's obligations, or uses that power against the people, it is the only course left for us.

BidenLikesMiners -4 points ago +2 / -6

\an fyi if youre chasing someone miles away it seems less like 'defense'.

krzyzowiec 9 points ago +9 / -0

Was it? I mean in the current political environment, I get your meaning, but in a sane world, that's exactly what you would want. All they were trying to do is detain him for the police. It's not their fault he was stupid enough to grab a shotgun barrel.

DoritoBlizzardPence 6 points ago +6 / -0

South africa is where the usa is wifh biden. A subhuman crominal burns loots murders and his victims are who aee punished

NuclearPoweredChevy 5 points ago +6 / -1

Going after Arbery with a gun was a terrible idea.

But forming a militia to enter a city that people know will be the center of riots is okay to you? You can’t have your cake and eat it. Either Americans have the right to bear arms and organize a militia or they cannot. Plus these people were defending their homes which had been broken into previously whereas Kyle defended a stranger’s business and went out of his way to stop rioters.

Both were justified in their actions. It’s a real shame conservatives don’t have the backbone to call this verdict a sham.

anon12 2 points ago +2 / -0

Conservatives go with whatever more people around them do, or what their authorities tell them to

They are pathetic, but they can at least be used for good if you know how to.

inquisitivedave 3 points ago +3 / -0

Its only a terrible idea because the law will punish you for it. this stuff doesn't have to happen.

current_horror 39 points ago +41 / -2

If the dude who got shot was white, they would have been acquited.

If Kyle had shot a black dude in self-defense, they would have voted guilty.

We no longer have equality under the law in this country.

Gizortnik 4 points ago +14 / -10

No chance. From what seems to have been presented in court, they were completely fucked. If they needed probable cause to arrest Arbery, then they were fucked.

Instead, they had about as much reason to stop Arbery as Huber had to stop Rittenhouse: not fucking much.

TheWestYearZero 19 points ago +19 / -0

But they didn't stop him. The nog attacked them as he was walking by the truck, suddenly leaping off the pavement to try to grab the gun.

Gizortnik -5 points ago +13 / -18

As I recall, they pursued him, then the mayos got out of their truck to arrest him without probable cause. That's where the problem lies. It's felonious act to try and detain them without enough cause to do so.

If you don't like my slur, then you can take yours down, and I'll do the same.

Grumman 10 points ago +11 / -1

the mayos got out of their truck to arrest him without probable cause

Occam's Razor says otherwise. I don't believe that they found a jogger and assumed without justification that he was a thief and completely by coincidence it was the thief known as The Jogger. Either they are psychic, or they had probable cause.

ghostfox1_ 5 points ago +5 / -0

He wuz a good boy, he dindu nuffin.

Just ignore his felony history and claiming he's just jogging.

Joggers gonna jog...

Gizortnik -1 points ago +1 / -2

Probable Cause is a very specific thing. The police need less than that to pull you over. They need that to actually cuff you and arrest you.

That's a lot. In fact, that's so much, they could have had the police get an open warrant for the guy and had him arrested on sight. But that's not what seemed to have happened.

deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Removed: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

You can't direct the slurs at people.

deleted 7 points ago +12 / -5
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for;

  • Rule 15 - Slurs

  • potential shill, check acct, spreading discord (not the app)

Comment Removed: Rule 15

Gizortnik -6 points ago +4 / -10

Oh, now you don't like slurs.

I admit this is slightly different from being called a jew all the time.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
when_we_win_remember 4 points ago +6 / -2

They were trying to detain him, not arrest. But I don't see why it matters. In fact, if everyone had survived, the guys could have gone on trial for unlawful detention, maybe assaulting with a weapon. In a case like this, you get one story: the one told by the survivor. We had a video, but it was shitty (by which I mean it didn't show the only important things that you would have wanted to see). That story was that Arbery attacked first, and nothing I read showed that story even challenged. IANAL. In my mind, if you are attacked and fight back, it's self defense. The law must be different, because all that seemed to matter was whether they had a right to be chasing the guy in the first place.

I think I'd allow them both self defense actually. There were so many points that this could have been averted that it amounts to mutual combat to me. I searched today and no one in the lame news seems to have explained the finer points of the law that the jury must have considered.

elleand202 5 points ago +6 / -1

They were trying to detain him, not arrest. But I don't see why it matters. In fact, if everyone had survived, the guys could have gone on trial for unlawful detention, maybe assaulting with a weapon.

Under GA law, they lump both detention and arrest together for the purposes of false imprisonment.

In my mind, if you are attacked and fight back, it's self defense.

Because they were committing a felony themselves (the false imprisonment), they could not assert self defense unless there had bee some sort of break in the sequence of events, which never happened.

What people aren't getting is that there's basically no right to conduct a citizen's arrest in GA, with very narrow exceptions. It doesn't matter under the law that Arbery was also a burglar because the McMichaels admitted that they didn't know that at the time.

when_we_win_remember 2 points ago +2 / -0

What people aren't getting is that there's basically no right to conduct a citizen's arrest in GA,

Well, kind of tangential, but what did they change, then? Stupid media says nothing useful. Wikipedia says Georgia's citizen's arrest law was "very broad in scope" which kind of contradicts what you say, but I'm not ragging on you; just saying I can't get any good information.

elleand202 1 point ago +1 / -0

It went from you could conduct a citizen's arrest if you witnessed a felony or became aware of a felony by someone who immediately witnessed it to no citizen's arrest at all.

Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

This might be pedantic, but I think detaining him would qualify as a "citizen's arrest".

. In fact, if everyone had survived, the guys could have gone on trial for unlawful detention, maybe assaulting with a weapon

That's the problem. The unlawful detention is a felony. Hence, Arbery's death is Felony Murder.

I think I'd allow them both self defense actually.

I actually agree with this. This was basically Colin Noir's position. Which could be reduced to: "If two guys in a truck drive past me, set up a road block, and jump out with guns: I'm dumping rounds on them."

From what the McMichaels were saying, it sounds like they pointed guns at Arbery, and then Arbery attacked them. That attack could absolutely be taken as self-defense... which is where my unease in the situation gets pretty bad. That's a horrifically stupid decision for Arbery that cost him his life, but the attack would have legal. If it were me, and some dude started yelling for me to stop, and pointed a shotgun at me? Then I'd pull a Colin Noir and just start blasting.

when_we_win_remember 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep I would have declared Arbery innocent if he had dumped rounds.

The citizen's arrest thing is odd. There was every evidence that it was and apparently no one challenged that except to say that the McMichaels didn't announce themselves. Yet the court apparently ruled it was not such an arrest. I've yet to see an explanation for that and I looked.

Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I'm not really clear on it either. The state doesn't want people policing their own communities for the most part, so this kind of stuff gets left purposely vague.

TheModernDaVinci 1 point ago +1 / -0

To play devils advocate: Arbery was unarmed. So while it very much would have been legally self defense trying to do something to the McMichaels, it seems extremely reckless to throw yourself at an armed individual trying to steal their weapon in an attempt to defend yourself. Because unless you have reason to believe they are just going to kill you anyway, the better option would be to surrender and live until you see a time to escape.

That said though, I dont have particular beef with either side here. Everything I had heard at the time made it sound like a situation where no one was in the right, so I more or less declared "a pox on both your houses!" months ago, and from what I have heard of the trial that did little to clear up that issue.

Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

it seems extremely reckless to throw yourself at an armed individual trying to steal their weapon in an attempt to defend yourself.

Oh no, it's retarded. Especially when the other guy has a fucking shotgun.

That's one of the things that kinda convinces me that Arbery was a genuine bad guy: he had a predator drive. He could have run into the woods at any time, but instead, he decided that he was gonna take the risk to (very likely) kill both of the McMichaels. By aggressing on them, he was starting an entangled gunfight that he could only win if he killed both of them. And he made that decision while he was 30-50 feet from the truck. He saw a threat, and instead of avoiding it, he engaged it. That's not normal human behavior unless you're a cop, military, or a first responded. You have to be trained to do that. Since he wasn't any of those things, he was not a regular civilian. He was a criminal who's probably bluffed people with force before.

I more or less declared "a pox on both your houses!" months ago

I was on the McMichaels' side more until I heard them talking, and it I can't help but think, "wow, you were basically asking for shit to go wrong."

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
DoritoBlizzardPence 12 points ago +14 / -2

Heres some probable cause:

The blmer was going around looting constructiin sites and then tried to assualt his victims and steal their gun

Gizortnik -6 points ago +7 / -13

The toilet-bowl-fleshed ones didn't have any evidence of any evidence of any active criminal behavior, they just had suspicion that he was engaged in crime. That's not probable cause, certainly not enough to actually stop him at the time.

DoritoBlizzardPence 11 points ago +13 / -2

Go suck off a blm riot you black supremacist trash

Gizortnik 0 points ago +1 / -1

Black National Socialism must be destroyed.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
when_we_win_remember 6 points ago +6 / -0

If the guy they shot was white, they'd have never been on trial. Remember, this whole thing was going to be swept under the rug because the shooters were friends with the DA or whatever and everyone in town. I mean, I guess you could argue it depends on which white guy they in theory shot. If the guy were rich or famous, perhaps something would have been done. If it was a methhead criminal, I think it would have gone away.

The only reason it went on trial was because of a viral video. The only reason people cared about that video was because it was an interracial crime.

Gizortnik 0 points ago +1 / -1

They wouldn't have swept it under the rug because they were white. They would have swept it under the rugs because they were cops.

when_we_win_remember 1 point ago +1 / -0

I said it was because they were cop friends of the DA. The only thing being white has to do with it is being white and cops made this into a civil rights case in the eyes of the public and the Federal jewdicial system. Which got it more attention. Contrary to popular belief white people in Georgia are not immune to policing.

Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was actually agreeing with you.


Federal jewdicial system


I'm just gonna leave it. Close enough.

WhiteyMcWhite 3 points ago +5 / -2

I didn't watch any of this trial. If what you say is true, and you add the Kyle Rittenhouse acquittal into the mix, our justice system is working basically perfectly. Although i would argue Kyle even being charged at all was a broken system. The politics at the top, and of course the fraudulent lying (((media))), are what needs to be fixed. Seems doable, though I am still not too optimistic.

Gizortnik 3 points ago +12 / -9

The system is obviously broken because the Left, particularly Soros and friends, have now become so desperate as to wield prosecutors themselves as a bludgeon.

The only way to inoculate a society from Leftism is to expose it to Leftism, as you would any other disease. Each red pill pushes each person a single step further away from the slave mentality they previously had. Every time you see another injustice, a lie, an act of barbarism rationalized, it only keeps feeding the animosity towards the Left. Until eventually, the whole Leftwing system becomes unpopular, it turns against itself, and it suffers a collapse & preference cascade. They do it all the time.

And enough with the echo-posting. Your enemies aren't jews, they are leftists. You might as well be blaming leagues of white executives for the financial, tech, PR, and HR industries from pushing Leftism and claiming it's a white conspiracy. It's not. The tie between everyone on the Left... is their lust for power through the rationalization of Leftism.

DoritoBlizzardPence 9 points ago +11 / -2

You call conservatives being arrested for wrong thought and self defense while subhuman black supremackst blm/antifa terrorists walk free as "working"? Gtfo to cuba you subhuman communjst scum

Gizortnik -4 points ago +5 / -9

Quit being fat. I spoke out against Leftism.

Instead of being black-pilled, understand that a culture war takes time and exposure to a population that has been indoctrinated for at least 2-3 generations.

NuclearPoweredChevy 8 points ago +8 / -0

Your enemies aren't jews, they are leftists.

You haven’t read enough about them then. Jews destroyed my family’s home country.

Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, I just know that Judeo-Bolshevism is bullshit. And I'm not going to cry for Palestine.

ernsithe 7 points ago +7 / -0

You might as well be blaming leagues of white executives for the financial, tech, PR, and HR industries

Executives and PR decisions are driven entirely by money/investors and public opinion. Read: banks and the media. If you want to call them Leftists or something else is up to the individual, but at least follow the strings all the way up.

Gizortnik 6 points ago +6 / -0

Executives and PR decisions are driven entirely by money/investors and public opinion.

I'm not so sure about the first, and the 2nd one is absolutely not the case. A lot of the purposes of PR is not to reflect public perception, but to mold and shape it as propaganda.

And yes, I'm following it all the way up to George Soros and Klaus Schwab. A Nazi Collaborator, and what I believe to be the son of a genuine Nazi.

Unknownsailor 2 points ago +2 / -0

You need to watch the Timcast episode from yesterday, with Poso and Branca:


The three should have walked, and their convictions will probably get overturned on appeal.

Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'll definitely watch Branca's interpretation. The issue is that Tim, Poso & Branca do not seem to be people who are willing to let others talk over them, on a show where everyone talks over each other.

If Branca's got his own vid, that would be better.

That being said, if he's right about the law supporting reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause, that's a huge problem.

However, he's also the one I've heard pooh-pooh the appeals court, so IDK.

CatoTheElder 32 points ago +34 / -2

Remember the three S's:



Shut up.

redsfan277 30 points ago +30 / -0

Have you noticed that everyone involved in courts is 'higher than thou' females. Even limp wristed males aren't this evil.

Let the society crumble fuck this insanity. Def clown world

JustHereForTheSalmon 22 points ago +22 / -0

It's the natural result of handing out rights without demanding responsibility.

almond_activator 12 points ago +12 / -0

Rights are privilege + responsibility.

Women are privileged. Full stop.

In fact, every group that isn't white + male + heterosexual is privileged, because all of them lack the full responsibility of citizenship in every western country.

DwydeShrude 27 points ago +28 / -1

I didn't really pay attention to the trial proceedings since I figured they were doomed to presumed guilt, but if I remember correctly:

  1. The perp was a known thief in the neighborhood and had a criminal record for theft
  2. The perp was obviously not in the neighborhood to jog, given his attire
  3. It is a proven fact that the perp was casing construction sites prior to the attempted citizen's arrest
  4. The cops had told the community that they would not respond to property crimes due to too much property crime
  5. The cops basically deputized the accused by telling them to police their own neighborhood
  6. The state changed their laws on citizens arrest AFTER this happened, implying that this was a valid attempted citizens arrest
acp_k2win 25 points ago +25 / -0

seems like their biggest mistake was calling the cops afterwards

SupremeReader 9 points ago +9 / -0

There were no witnesses?

acp_k2win 9 points ago +9 / -0

Its hindsight of course but seems like a plea to fleeing the scene is easier time than murder.

krzyzowiec 14 points ago +14 / -0

I don't even understand how it was determined to be murder, since the shotgun was not fired until he grabbed it.

acp_k2win 38 points ago +38 / -0

it was murder because they are white and the dead guy is black, no other circumstances matter

krzyzowiec 10 points ago +11 / -1

Yeah that's what it seems. I mean even for recording it? Crazy. And this happened in Brunswick too. I figured it would be closer to Atlanta. White people (meaning the jury) aren't this crazy in SC.

DoritoBlizzardPence 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cry end game

GimmeFuelGimmeFire 0 points ago +2 / -2

7 blacks on the jury, 5 White people.

krzyzowiec 1 point ago +2 / -1

But the racial makeup of the jury has been stirring controversy since it was finalized on Wednesday: Only one juror is Black, while the other 11 are white.


MargarineMongoose 11 points ago +11 / -0

Because in clown world there's no scenario in which a white man is justified in killing a black man.

BidenLikesMiners -5 points ago +1 / -6

*chasing a robber down is not your green light to murdr him

BidenLikesMiners -3 points ago +1 / -4

*felony murde, in committing a crime they led to a murdr.

krzyzowiec 7 points ago +7 / -0

What crime? A citizen's arrest is legal.

elleand202 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not in Georgia. The only way that the citizen's arrest would have been legal is if they had know that Arbery had just burglarized the house, which they admitted on the stand that they did not.

krzyzowiec 1 point ago +1 / -0

The law says they need a reasonable suspicion or probable cause.

blyat56 23 points ago +24 / -1

All the people who supposedly got "woken up" to the media's bullshit by the Rittenhouse debacle flipped the switch right back to regurgitating MSM koolaid today.

Well now that they've sacrificed these guys to the mob, perhaps Georgia's holiday parades will be safe this year.

BidenLikesMiners -6 points ago +4 / -10

or - chasing a robber miles doesnt give you the right to execute them.

blyat56 16 points ago +17 / -1

There was no execution. He attacked them and tried to grab a gun, which is deadly force.

ghostfox1_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't try to grab a gun while being a dindu felon and you probably won't get shot.

WhiteyMcWhite 18 points ago +18 / -0

An older Vietnamese immigrant told me awhile back, "Blacks are going to be the downfall of America" and it's looking like he was Nostradamus with that prediction.

deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
acp_k2win 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thomas Jefferson knew that, it is why he was against slavery

cheeto_dust 14 points ago +14 / -0

I haven't really followed this case and only have a general overview of what happened. But why did the guy who just recorded it get in trouble? Can anyone explain like I'm five/retarded/redditor?

ernsithe 10 points ago +10 / -0

Can anyone explain like I'm five/retarded/redditor?

Sure. Justice in America is dead.

DoritoBlizzardPence 10 points ago +10 / -0

Because Whites dared to defend themselves from black supremacisf vermin

elleand202 8 points ago +8 / -0

He admitted on the stand that he helped in stopping Arbery. That admission made him a party to the false imprisonment. Add in Arbery fucking around and finding out and the felony murder statute and he's screwed.

MrJ4242 [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Felony murder not having a clause of exception for intent is horseshit.

BidenLikesMiners -2 points ago +1 / -3

contributing to a crime, like aaccompices in heists.

HarryPearce 12 points ago +12 / -0

I am sick of all the "right wing" morons falling over themselves to extol how amazingly just it is to imprison 3 people for life for icing an obvious degenerate deviant criminal, because they feel existential dread after kyle got off. Like lusty whores they scour the internet for any black person to uplift and venerate, to prove how non-racist they are.

If you live in a retarded leftoid state you deserve what you get

Johan_Liebert 7 points ago +7 / -0

McMichael's Jr is the reason they were found guilty, go watch his testimony and you'll realize how much of an retard he is....Recap with what actually fucked them and it was majority him. DON'T PUT LOW IQ CLIENTS ON THE STAND.


TrashWolf 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is what I said. The retard fucked himself on the stand when he couldn't articulate what crime arbery had committed to justify his citizens arrest.
He fucked himself and the appeal.
At the very least they had a strong appeal case considering the judges ridiculous interpretation of the citizens arrest law, and the fact the judge allowed the jury to deliberate among themselves what the law means.
Stop taking the stand as the defendant holy shit.

Misandryaintright 7 points ago +7 / -0

How in the fuck do two people get charged with murder who didn't commit a murder? The mental gymnastics of these foul cretins in the criminal injustice system never ceases to amaze me. And the guy who did the killing did so when he was attacked, hardly a thing of malice.

Then charged with five counts of murder?! Double jeopardy laws and the exorbitant amount of laws are the main causes of mass incarceration, which is what the United States of Tyranny intended with malicious purpose. The more laws, the less justice. If it were three black guys and one white in this scenario, BLM and the left would riot for sure.

Of course the leftist police want to charge all three with a hate thought crime. Lmao.

The sooner the US is Coup d'état'd, the better. It is far too gone and utterly corrupt. Especially that evil fucking "justice' system. Disgusting evil treacherous dastardly country.

BidenLikesMiners -6 points ago +2 / -8

because they commited a crime that led to the murdr

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
mharmless 7 points ago +7 / -0

I've said it before, and I'll say it again.

The price of one is very, very high. But every one after that is free...

Only go shopping when you are prepared to buy in bulk.

DoritoBlizzardPence 6 points ago +6 / -0

South africa in the usa is here

subbookkeeper 3 points ago +3 / -0

Any chance of a protest about this at all?

MrJ4242 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Aside from the blacks rioting and killing in celebration no.

Maker_Wolf 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unlike the Rittenhouse trial this one is actually pretty complicated. I didn't watch the trial so I'll have to reserve judgement. Given the basic facts of the case however, I think a life sentence is excessive for the shooter, and totally inappropriate for the other 2.

cciv 2 points ago +3 / -1

I suppose you didn't watch the trial.

Gizortnik 1 point ago +14 / -13

Well, if you're just going to be black-pilled about the country, go crawl into your hole and leave the rest of us out of it.

In case you hadn't noticed from the progressive rhetoric, blacks are absolutely going to prison and shooting each other, so the idea that they have free reign is obviously stupid, even with popular anti-white sentiment in the establishment Left.

Also, the McMichaels really fucked the dog on this. If they were supposed to have probable cause, they really should have not tried to stop him, let alone pull over and get out of the car. They got hit by the felony murder charge, and I can't really deny that for at least one of them.

As for the cammer, that guy got fucked. He shouldn't have been facing a felony murder charge for not having participated in the stop.

DoritoBlizzardPence 18 points ago +18 / -0

They have affirmative action, are able to burn loot murder without punishment, dehumanize Whites, etc.

I wish i had these gibs and privledges that blacks get

Gizortnik -7 points ago +3 / -10

Honestly, no you don't. Look what it's done.

Affirmative Action not only doesn't help, it actually promotes failure and people give up more because they didn't develop the human capital skills to succeed in the space they were placed. Look at the destruction of black communities, the cycle of violence, and the entitlement that they've been taught to have without punishments. Look at how a culture of resentment against whites has colored every aspect of their perspective so that they never take a single step to improve their lives.

You don't want that shit. It's a poison pill.

tobeornotto 11 points ago +11 / -0

They're underperforming because they have low IQs, anything else like 'entitlement' or 'they're failing because we help them too much', or whatever else you invent is just cope, rationalization, and post hoc garbage.

There is no reality in which a demographic with a 85 IQ average could do well or compete in modern societies where high information processing skills are required to function.

Besides just the ability to retain and manipulate information IQ correlates extremely well with long term orientation, the ability to delay gratification, crime, low impulse control, violence, success, tolerance of ambiguity, knowledge aquisition, ability for deliberate action, self control, risk managment, ability to learn, and a whole other list of abilities that modern societies expect.

You can collect a group of whites with a 85 IQ average in a neighbourhood and within a couple of generations they will have perfectly recreated for you the inner city life.

Imagine thinking that affirmative action is what's causing violence....

No resentment caused by being made to compete in societies where they can feel they can't possibley succeed is what's causing violence.

Crime being the only viable path to material wealth unless you're artistically or athlethically gifted is what's causing violence.

DoritoBlizzardPence 11 points ago +11 / -0

I currently am demonized for the color of my skin via crt and affirmative action.

I wish I had the same privledge blacks get from democrats. i would get free scholarships and any high paying job i want due to my skin color, (affirmstive action is black privledge) and then be worshiped by democrats, and never charged with any crime.

WhiteyMcWhite 4 points ago +5 / -1

Honestly if you hate black people, voting Democrat has to be a consideration. Tons of black babies aborted, murders rampant in the community, nothing done to try to make it better. They do give lots of freebies to the blacks, but so what, to live in horrid conditions and a culture of death and despair, no thanks. To vote for these conditions willingly truly means the IQ tests are accurate.

DoritoBlizzardPence 7 points ago +7 / -0

Democrats love blacks. Look at affirmstive action, crt, gibs, and how crt demonizes Whites.

I wish i would get the same privledges democrsts give blacks.

Gizortnik -2 points ago +5 / -7

There are alt-righters who will tell you Richard Spencer is a fed because he voted Biden and sounds progressive.

I'm telling you he's ahead of the fucking curve. White Racial Affinity is the next step of "White Supremacy with a Guilty Conscience" and Spencer is putting himself in a prime spot to take all the Bernie Bros and Cortez fans who have heard the banging of the racial drum of racial solidarity, and are going to start asking: why not me?

At the same time, I can only imagine how hard he laughed when BLM raked in $100 million dollars and some of their leadership took the money and fucking ran after the left continued to celebrate black abortions and the burning of black cities.

BidenLikesMiners -2 points ago +1 / -3

INteresting post, he had downvoted.

Gizortnik -4 points ago +1 / -5

I think it's Doritos freaking out because I used an anti-white racial slur. I don't like it, but sometimes it has to be done.

I do think Richard Spencer really is positioning himself for some part of the White Left to go full Woodrow Wilson.

redguards_are_nwahs 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think it's Doritos freaking out because I used an anti-white racial slur.

You keep drinking your own cum over having done this, for some reason. Why?

Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is the 2nd time I mentioned this, and it was specifically because of the conversation. I don't know why you think I'm making a big deal about it. Doritos is.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
BidenLikesMiners -3 points ago +3 / -6

Has there been irrevocable proof that he was robbing? Or two good ol bois just 'THOUGHT' he was robbing?

Thoughts /= actions, tho shitlibs really want silence to be violence.

Bookmobile88 -19 points ago +3 / -22

If you can’t kill someone for having dirty toenails, might as well move to a free county like Belarus.

redguards_are_nwahs 18 points ago +20 / -2

You don't live in a country where they euthanize retards, obviously

BidenLikesMiners -2 points ago +1 / -3

good because dems would call every conservative a retard, dumbass

redguards_are_nwahs 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't think my joke was that hard to get

deleted 12 points ago +13 / -1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for:

  • Rule 2 - Violent Speech
  • Gay violence fixation

Comment Removed: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

DoritoBlizzardPence 7 points ago +7 / -0

Dont you have a footlocker to looy blm vermin?