“The court was not in a position to generalize about the capability of persons of different ages to understand what is necessary for them to be competent to consent to the administration of puberty blockers,” the Lord Chief Justice Lord Burnett, with Sir. Geoffrey Vos and Lady Justice King, said in the judgment, The Times reported. “It placed patients, parents and clinicians in a very difficult position.”
Oh, it puts them in a 'very difficult position' to use some fucking common sense?
Kids under 16 are only doing anything at the urging of somebody else, probably an adult - or their peer who in turn has some creeper influencing them.
So "without parental consent" just means groomers have more control of the kids than parents.
according to the jews, 12 year old females and 13 year old males are fully fledged adults
Oh, it puts them in a 'very difficult position' to use some fucking common sense?
Pedophile fucks.
Parents should get rid of such doctors. It is a moral duty.
next up: forced circumcisions of babies, for the medical benefits
The state has determined your new baby boy is really a girl. Reassignment surgery was completed 2 hours after birth. Congratulations.
Thomas have never seen such bullshit
Puberty blockers: "Male puberty is irreversible! Reeee!"
Sports: "Testosterone suppression of post-pubescent males makes you just as weak as a woman! Reeee!"
Comment Reported for: Rule 1 - Illegal Activity
Comment Removed: I think you were talking about John Money & Friends, but I'd rather be safe than sorry.