Then what does? Don't tell me universal democracy because that's a joke.
In the US revolution, I've read only about 10% of the population actually participated. Many civilians fled to Canada. Of those who stayed, who is to say they really wanted the new government vs. the Crown or something else, but were too afraid of social pressure and the militia to say anything?
Before that, literally every society and country in the world was created by military conquest. (or negotiations between kingdoms) It amused me that anyone was surprised China was so fast to recognize the Taliban. Why wouldn't they? Mandate of heaven (conquest) is the only way they've ever changed governments too.
Honestly, with how I’ve seen western society crumble the more egalitarian we have become, the more I understand these strict social laws in super religious societies. The biological needs of women (“nOt aLL wAhMen!” Yes, but on a balance of probabilities...) are counter intuitive to a free and just society because women are hardwired to be communitarian. They are hard wired for equal outcome. Which is a recipe for failure. The restraints society and religion had in place for women is what prevented society from spiraling out of control for years, and it’s all accelerated tenfold with those restraints removed. Most modern women are adult children and it’s sickening.
That depends on how much of a genius. Extremely high-IQ individuals can't help but express it: they're not just cognitively different from ordinary people: they operate differently on a physical level as well. Two of the most famous examples are Isaac Newton and Nikola Tesla, both of whom reportedly only needed two or three hours of sleep a night. Newton reportedly died a virgin, and Tesla rarely bothered with women. Both of them reportedly commented that they thought sex and romance were a waste of time. People like that simply aren't motivated by the same things that motivate the rest of us, hormones notwithstanding. Or perhaps because they had a different hormonal balance due to their brains being wired differently.
Either way, men like that are much less likely to emerge in Afghanistan than they are in Europe, regardless of how many girls there are in their classrooms.
Whatever. It’s their society and country they can run it how they see fit.
Speaking of, interesting how western society is run, isn’t it?
You mean how it's nearly all run by women and their puppets, no matter who you vote for or what they promise?
I bet you'd have the same tune when antifa is made leader of your town. It's their town, get over it, bigot.
S I M P
He's not wrong. An armed gang taking over and imposing its will on the rest of society does not make the country "their society and country".
Then what does? Don't tell me universal democracy because that's a joke.
In the US revolution, I've read only about 10% of the population actually participated. Many civilians fled to Canada. Of those who stayed, who is to say they really wanted the new government vs. the Crown or something else, but were too afraid of social pressure and the militia to say anything?
Before that, literally every society and country in the world was created by military conquest. (or negotiations between kingdoms) It amused me that anyone was surprised China was so fast to recognize the Taliban. Why wouldn't they? Mandate of heaven (conquest) is the only way they've ever changed governments too.
yeah that's right. The americans had no right.
Yeah I simp for freedom. keep sucking goatfuxker cock, retard
Women globally need to shut up, get out of education, stay at home, and completely stay out of the public sphere. I.e.: A return to sanity.
That was totally worth twenty years, a trillion dollars and hundreds of American lives.
"Women will be allowed to study"
Also "We will not be killing any members of the former Army"
Guess which one of these is a lie
The second one.
They know they'd get less international condemnation for that, because the whole world is a matriarchal circus.
Taliban doing God's work, accidentally.
Honestly, with how I’ve seen western society crumble the more egalitarian we have become, the more I understand these strict social laws in super religious societies. The biological needs of women (“nOt aLL wAhMen!” Yes, but on a balance of probabilities...) are counter intuitive to a free and just society because women are hardwired to be communitarian. They are hard wired for equal outcome. Which is a recipe for failure. The restraints society and religion had in place for women is what prevented society from spiraling out of control for years, and it’s all accelerated tenfold with those restraints removed. Most modern women are adult children and it’s sickening.
In before we see a massive increase in geniuses from Afghanistan because of the removal of toxic female influence and bias.
Bruh. Genetics are genetics. The number of geniuses in Afghanistan is not going to increase whatever the social factors.
Hormones are a limiting factor. A genius who never fully expresses himself won't be identified as a genius.
That depends on how much of a genius. Extremely high-IQ individuals can't help but express it: they're not just cognitively different from ordinary people: they operate differently on a physical level as well. Two of the most famous examples are Isaac Newton and Nikola Tesla, both of whom reportedly only needed two or three hours of sleep a night. Newton reportedly died a virgin, and Tesla rarely bothered with women. Both of them reportedly commented that they thought sex and romance were a waste of time. People like that simply aren't motivated by the same things that motivate the rest of us, hormones notwithstanding. Or perhaps because they had a different hormonal balance due to their brains being wired differently.
Either way, men like that are much less likely to emerge in Afghanistan than they are in Europe, regardless of how many girls there are in their classrooms.
Now that's a great loss to humanity, if true.
Are you learning Pashto already?
I don't want to convert to Islam, so no.
I knew there was some good in you.