No, because those are actually rival factions. The Israelis are not part of the game plan because they've been operating independently for decades, in the face of a lot of geo-political interests, and never committed to any one side beyond their own.
The Banking Elites in London and NYC are tied to China, not Israel. That's where they put all their investments. Israel is not as centrally planned, and will not generate as lucrative of a return as China will. And China is holding all of the elites investments.
This is incidentally why the alt-right have to do mental gymnastics about why Jews are supposedly all on the same side, but Globalist European Jews and Nationalist Israeli Jews seem to constantly be at odds... it's because they are genuinely at odds. Lo and behold, the Israeli Nationalists put Israel in front of literally everyone else, even to the detriment of the US, UK, and Internationalist organizations... because that's what a Nationalist does. By contrast, Fabian Socialist Jews... are Socialists, and are putting their internationalist interests first. A wiped out Israel, genuinely, wouldn't upset them too much because it would mean the destruction of the Israeli government. Look how much they were fighting to get Netanyahu out.
Israel is a prosperous country, but the return on investment for truly massive amounts of capital just isn't' there. The currency, frankly, isn't debased enough for most of the internationalists to be comfortable. It's actually getting fairly expensive because of how Israel is handling their monetary system. Honestly, no one talking is about the Shekel being the next reserve currency.
None of that is true Yuan. The massive megolopolis controlled by government protected cartels mean that anybody investing in those structures are going to make trillions if there is a major transfer of wealth out of the US, which is the primary objective moving forward.
You're completely strawmanning the "anti-semitic" position. These people realize that there are two very distinct Jewish factions - secular radleft globalist Jews versus religious nationalist Israeli Jews. The distinction is of limited importance when you realize that both factions:
control huge swaths of government and media
use their power and influence to the detriment of America
Pointing the finger exclusively at China is simply retarded. The radleft subversion of every American institution began long before China became a serious player on the modern geopolitical stage. Certainly they are tossing the most fuel on the fire right now, but the bigger issue is still the Americans enthusiastically using Chinese money to destroy America.
I don't think I did. The anti-semitic position can't make any explanation about the behavior of Nationalist v. Internationalst Jews beyond "they wouldn't do that for us" and that's the end of the logic, and they typically refuse to acknowledge the difference and treat both groups as the same. Mostly because they're still using arguments from Judeo-Bolshevism.
Certainly they are tossing the most fuel on the fire right now, but the bigger issue is still the Americans enthusiastically using Chinese money to destroy America.
That's what I said. Maybe it didn't come across like that, but this is exactly my point.
Interesting stuff. Off-topic but the kind of find a parallel, if an inverse one, between the anti-semitic position of treating jews as a monolithic group, regardless of faction and skin color, or geopolitical position, and the current Anti-american socialist position on how the North American tribes were dealt with over land, by addressing them as one "redskinned" conglomerate rather than individual sovereign tribes and cultures in different circumstances, for making a political argument.
What tended to happen with Tribes in America is that many were dealt with on an individual level, simply trading and purchasing goods at a completely normal way. The assimilation of natives in North America was largely peaceful by comparison to the Spanish and Portuguese brutal conquests and subjugation, given that the French tended to rely on Indian exports and the British profited off of trade generally.
However, the Leftist Racialists, and BLM in particular are treating Whites as they would treat Jews because BLM in particular are National Socialists.
It's going to be done through their transaction structures and platforms
All income will be effectively debt-based linked to them
All smaller competition will be destroyed, forcing everyone to interact with their subsidiary corporations (who are making payments to them)
They are going to make larger cuts on every transaction, on every holding, of every financial vehicle, on Earth. All of asset wealth of everyone is going to be put into debt-based monetary vehicles that they are the primary beneficiaries of.
However, for China in particular, the elites are heavily invested in China. China is designed to be the biggest growth economy in the world at the expense of literally every other country on the planet, and that is where the elites & Fabians are going to be getting the biggest cuts.
No, because those are actually rival factions. The Israelis are not part of the game plan because they've been operating independently for decades, in the face of a lot of geo-political interests, and never committed to any one side beyond their own.
The Banking Elites in London and NYC are tied to China, not Israel. That's where they put all their investments. Israel is not as centrally planned, and will not generate as lucrative of a return as China will. And China is holding all of the elites investments.
This is incidentally why the alt-right have to do mental gymnastics about why Jews are supposedly all on the same side, but Globalist European Jews and Nationalist Israeli Jews seem to constantly be at odds... it's because they are genuinely at odds. Lo and behold, the Israeli Nationalists put Israel in front of literally everyone else, even to the detriment of the US, UK, and Internationalist organizations... because that's what a Nationalist does. By contrast, Fabian Socialist Jews... are Socialists, and are putting their internationalist interests first. A wiped out Israel, genuinely, wouldn't upset them too much because it would mean the destruction of the Israeli government. Look how much they were fighting to get Netanyahu out.
Israel is a prosperous country, but the return on investment for truly massive amounts of capital just isn't' there. The currency, frankly, isn't debased enough for most of the internationalists to be comfortable. It's actually getting fairly expensive because of how Israel is handling their monetary system. Honestly, no one talking is about the Shekel being the next reserve currency.
None of that is true Yuan. The massive megolopolis controlled by government protected cartels mean that anybody investing in those structures are going to make trillions if there is a major transfer of wealth out of the US, which is the primary objective moving forward.
You're completely strawmanning the "anti-semitic" position. These people realize that there are two very distinct Jewish factions - secular radleft globalist Jews versus religious nationalist Israeli Jews. The distinction is of limited importance when you realize that both factions:
control huge swaths of government and media
use their power and influence to the detriment of America
Pointing the finger exclusively at China is simply retarded. The radleft subversion of every American institution began long before China became a serious player on the modern geopolitical stage. Certainly they are tossing the most fuel on the fire right now, but the bigger issue is still the Americans enthusiastically using Chinese money to destroy America.
I don't think I did. The anti-semitic position can't make any explanation about the behavior of Nationalist v. Internationalst Jews beyond "they wouldn't do that for us" and that's the end of the logic, and they typically refuse to acknowledge the difference and treat both groups as the same. Mostly because they're still using arguments from Judeo-Bolshevism.
That's what I said. Maybe it didn't come across like that, but this is exactly my point.
Interesting stuff. Off-topic but the kind of find a parallel, if an inverse one, between the anti-semitic position of treating jews as a monolithic group, regardless of faction and skin color, or geopolitical position, and the current Anti-american socialist position on how the North American tribes were dealt with over land, by addressing them as one "redskinned" conglomerate rather than individual sovereign tribes and cultures in different circumstances, for making a political argument.
What tended to happen with Tribes in America is that many were dealt with on an individual level, simply trading and purchasing goods at a completely normal way. The assimilation of natives in North America was largely peaceful by comparison to the Spanish and Portuguese brutal conquests and subjugation, given that the French tended to rely on Indian exports and the British profited off of trade generally.
However, the Leftist Racialists, and BLM in particular are treating Whites as they would treat Jews because BLM in particular are National Socialists.
BLM admits that it is a Marxist organization, and Marxism is a fundamentally antisemetic. In fact, it's literally just antisemitsm.
Hitler's National Socialism is explicitly built on Marx's antisemitism, but runs with it by Socializing a Race.
It's not an accident that BLM is targeting whites and using literally all the same arguments, and it's why their rhetoric is genuinely pre-genocidal.
Why would this transfer of wealth make the bankers trillions?
Multiple ways:
They are going to make larger cuts on every transaction, on every holding, of every financial vehicle, on Earth. All of asset wealth of everyone is going to be put into debt-based monetary vehicles that they are the primary beneficiaries of.
However, for China in particular, the elites are heavily invested in China. China is designed to be the biggest growth economy in the world at the expense of literally every other country on the planet, and that is where the elites & Fabians are going to be getting the biggest cuts.
They need China to become a super-power.
Man, thus really sucks.
I'd say its in calling in the loans, when wealth leaves old country loans are up and bank gets considerably good property gains
It's good to see some sense! That used to be the norm on .win.
Is patriots still miga and Lin woods?
Idk. I've only looked at a few threads at a time there for a while.
What's MIGA? Make India Great Again?
Lol. Make Israel great again