I don't think I did. The anti-semitic position can't make any explanation about the behavior of Nationalist v. Internationalst Jews beyond "they wouldn't do that for us" and that's the end of the logic, and they typically refuse to acknowledge the difference and treat both groups as the same. Mostly because they're still using arguments from Judeo-Bolshevism.
Certainly they are tossing the most fuel on the fire right now, but the bigger issue is still the Americans enthusiastically using Chinese money to destroy America.
That's what I said. Maybe it didn't come across like that, but this is exactly my point.
Interesting stuff. Off-topic but the kind of find a parallel, if an inverse one, between the anti-semitic position of treating jews as a monolithic group, regardless of faction and skin color, or geopolitical position, and the current Anti-american socialist position on how the North American tribes were dealt with over land, by addressing them as one "redskinned" conglomerate rather than individual sovereign tribes and cultures in different circumstances, for making a political argument.
What tended to happen with Tribes in America is that many were dealt with on an individual level, simply trading and purchasing goods at a completely normal way. The assimilation of natives in North America was largely peaceful by comparison to the Spanish and Portuguese brutal conquests and subjugation, given that the French tended to rely on Indian exports and the British profited off of trade generally.
However, the Leftist Racialists, and BLM in particular are treating Whites as they would treat Jews because BLM in particular are National Socialists.
I don't think I did. The anti-semitic position can't make any explanation about the behavior of Nationalist v. Internationalst Jews beyond "they wouldn't do that for us" and that's the end of the logic, and they typically refuse to acknowledge the difference and treat both groups as the same. Mostly because they're still using arguments from Judeo-Bolshevism.
That's what I said. Maybe it didn't come across like that, but this is exactly my point.
Interesting stuff. Off-topic but the kind of find a parallel, if an inverse one, between the anti-semitic position of treating jews as a monolithic group, regardless of faction and skin color, or geopolitical position, and the current Anti-american socialist position on how the North American tribes were dealt with over land, by addressing them as one "redskinned" conglomerate rather than individual sovereign tribes and cultures in different circumstances, for making a political argument.
What tended to happen with Tribes in America is that many were dealt with on an individual level, simply trading and purchasing goods at a completely normal way. The assimilation of natives in North America was largely peaceful by comparison to the Spanish and Portuguese brutal conquests and subjugation, given that the French tended to rely on Indian exports and the British profited off of trade generally.
However, the Leftist Racialists, and BLM in particular are treating Whites as they would treat Jews because BLM in particular are National Socialists.
BLM admits that it is a Marxist organization, and Marxism is a fundamentally antisemetic. In fact, it's literally just antisemitsm.
Hitler's National Socialism is explicitly built on Marx's antisemitism, but runs with it by Socializing a Race.
It's not an accident that BLM is targeting whites and using literally all the same arguments, and it's why their rhetoric is genuinely pre-genocidal.