Umm, so? You do realize that business partners can and do sue each other constantly, and continue to do business during and after the suits are resolved, right?
I got rid of Facebook nearly a decade ago and don't miss it at all, but a lot of people use it. Presumably this is money that Candace thinks is worth spending for the service that Facebook provides to reach those people, despite the disagreements she has with Facebook itself.
They'll work their shit out in court, someone will be awarded damages or not, and they'll continue to operate in whatever manner they think is most advantageous to their cause.
Also, I'll just note, Candace seems to be doing alright if her organization is able to spend 7 figures on Facebook advertising alone. I don't (and won't) give her any money, but a lot of people must be.
So, if I understand this correctly--this is money she directly pays Facebook for promotion, advertisting, etc? Not something like a royalty they take on ad dollars she receives, right?
This isn't a deal breaker for me on her. You have to pick snd choose your battles. I hate some of the crap companies like Wal-Mart and Amazon say and do, but I stil shop there because I can't get certain items elsewhere in my small town.
This is incredibly reminiscent of people screaming about Russia buying facebook ads.
Who cares? Advertising/Propaganda is the only way to convince idiots and spread messages, and you should be blocking all ads anyways. If our enemies will publish our ideas and spread them amongst the people unable to block them, all the better.
I mean, did we all not just have that thread where people were all butthurt over NVIDIA Shield displaying propaganda to them? Why shouldn't we co-opt this tactic and put our propaganda in every possible crevice we can find a place for it to take root?
Umm, so? You do realize that business partners can and do sue each other constantly, and continue to do business during and after the suits are resolved, right?
I got rid of Facebook nearly a decade ago and don't miss it at all, but a lot of people use it. Presumably this is money that Candace thinks is worth spending for the service that Facebook provides to reach those people, despite the disagreements she has with Facebook itself.
They'll work their shit out in court, someone will be awarded damages or not, and they'll continue to operate in whatever manner they think is most advantageous to their cause.
Also, I'll just note, Candace seems to be doing alright if her organization is able to spend 7 figures on Facebook advertising alone. I don't (and won't) give her any money, but a lot of people must be.
To be frank, any political pundit is a grifter on some level.
So, if I understand this correctly--this is money she directly pays Facebook for promotion, advertisting, etc? Not something like a royalty they take on ad dollars she receives, right?
The woman that instantly became a conservative after being a woketard is a grifter?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ESWNgppXkAAQ0zp?format=jpg
This isn't a deal breaker for me on her. You have to pick snd choose your battles. I hate some of the crap companies like Wal-Mart and Amazon say and do, but I stil shop there because I can't get certain items elsewhere in my small town.
This is incredibly reminiscent of people screaming about Russia buying facebook ads.
Who cares? Advertising/Propaganda is the only way to convince idiots and spread messages, and you should be blocking all ads anyways. If our enemies will publish our ideas and spread them amongst the people unable to block them, all the better.
I mean, did we all not just have that thread where people were all butthurt over NVIDIA Shield displaying propaganda to them? Why shouldn't we co-opt this tactic and put our propaganda in every possible crevice we can find a place for it to take root?