I expected to see the whole abuse accusation being something like "verbal abuse because I gained weight" or some sort of crap they came up with. It does actually seem like this woman went through some shit from this guy going back to a young teen and I'm not totally sure I blame her for offing him. I'm not sure this particular story is egregious enough on it's own for me to claim France is about to fall to female supremacy. Presuming it hasn't already fallen of course.
It does seem like there's a part of the story that's not being told though. It sounds like she had tons of opportunities to go a different direction and chose not to.
Yeah, I think that's what feels off about it. It's one of those stories that feels like it would be a badly written book. There's not enough nuance to it to give it a sense of being real.
The timing is suspicious - yet again during the football? This trick got pulled before.
Imagine that, history does not stop during a two-month tournament that takes place effectively every 2 years (World Cup and Euro).
The story doesn't check out with any logic.
It does not check out with your variant on logic. But in reality, abuse is complicated, and someone who is abused all her life is messed up and not that difficult to control. See Fritzl's poor daughter.
If she was telling the truth I'd still want her locked up, because using the worst example of a person as a justification for an exploitable precedent is typical feminism.
You want to lock her up to avoid setting a precedent for less worthy cases, but you would not believe that she acted wrongly, am I getting that right?
Bacot has admitted to shooting Daniel Polette in 2016. She previously referred to him as her stepfather before they married.Polette had started raping her when she was only 12 or 13, according to court documents. At that time he was her mother's boyfriend; he later became Bacot's husband and father of their four children. --- step parents, male or female, are more likely to abuse a kid. You stay married and don't subject your kids to the risk. If true I don't know if I have a problem with this. Grooming and repeated rape. Dude deserves death. Doesn't necessarily make her fit for the public though.
In her bestselling book "Tout Le Monde Savait" ("Everyone Knew"), published in May, Bacot, 40, said Polette, 25 years her senior, first raped her when she was 12 years old, impregnated her at 17 and went on to abuse her over the course of 18 years.
Do you recall the case of the Austrian Fritzl? Even if we assume that your view of the world is correct, the idea that abuse victims (actual ones) who have been abused all their lives will act in a remotely rational way is doubtful. The only reason Fritzl was caught is because he sent someone who was wounded to the hospital instead of letting the kid die.
Yes, this seems like a very hard case. But given the amount of stuff that is alleged, if even a small portion is true, it would justify offing him in my mind. On the other hand, you don't want to give people the right to kill others based on unsubstantiated claims.
How many reasons are we up to now not to marry western women?
If you absolutely feel the need to get married, do what Eddie Murphy joked about: find yourself a bush bitch and keep her the hell out of the states, or any western nation for that matter.
How about you quote something someone actually says for once, instead of making something up and debunking your strawman more retarded than your one-balled Fuehrer?
I love how you think anyone is going to take your reductio ad absurdum fallacies seriously. I also love how you’re too fucking retarded to even know what a “quote” is. Keep replying. Defend shill accounts. It looks great on you.
You call literally everyone who doesn't call for the immediate murder of all the Joooz a 'paid shill'. Because the only reasonable explanation for not partaking of your retardation is being paid. I wish being sane came with remuneration, but it doesn't.
[still repeating proven falsehoods because it’s paid to post here and doesn’t give a shit about reality unless it’s expedient to its ideological paycheck]
Again, yes, you remain funny. That’s why you get replies. Also because you are demonstrably wrong about everything you say. Cry harder about it or just stop posting proven lies.
No one gives a shit about you. You just don’t matter at all, except insofar as you’re wrong about everything you say, which makes it fun to expose your paid shilling.
People like you will blame the Jews until Melinda Gates is literally injecting you with estrogen.
lol, dipshit paid shill thinks that his reductio ad absurdum fallacy will be accepted
HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA THIS IS WHAT THE PAID SHILL ACTUALLY BELIEVES. IT’S SO FUCKING SOLIPSISTIC THAT IT THINKS THE WORLD EXISTS ONLY TO CATER TO ITS WHIMSHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHA
For all my disagreements with him, he actually seems like a fairly OK person to have a beer with, while you just appear as a maladjusted, raving psycho who can't shut up about how much he hates da Joooooooooz.
Basically any woman can kill her husband or boyfriend and then say "he was abusive". Stay safe brothers, stay safe...
He was her step-father and she was impregnated by him at 17. You figure out the rest.
And stoning women to death in Iran is legal.
I expected to see the whole abuse accusation being something like "verbal abuse because I gained weight" or some sort of crap they came up with. It does actually seem like this woman went through some shit from this guy going back to a young teen and I'm not totally sure I blame her for offing him. I'm not sure this particular story is egregious enough on it's own for me to claim France is about to fall to female supremacy. Presuming it hasn't already fallen of course.
It does seem like there's a part of the story that's not being told though. It sounds like she had tons of opportunities to go a different direction and chose not to.
Yeah, I think that's what feels off about it. It's one of those stories that feels like it would be a badly written book. There's not enough nuance to it to give it a sense of being real.
What if you did believe that she was raped and abused for basically her whole life? Would you then say anything different from what you say now/
I know that you don't believe it, or say that you don't.
The question is: would you say anything differently if you did? I sense that you don't want to answer this question. Why is that?
Imagine that, history does not stop during a two-month tournament that takes place effectively every 2 years (World Cup and Euro).
It does not check out with your variant on logic. But in reality, abuse is complicated, and someone who is abused all her life is messed up and not that difficult to control. See Fritzl's poor daughter.
You want to lock her up to avoid setting a precedent for less worthy cases, but you would not believe that she acted wrongly, am I getting that right?
Bacot has admitted to shooting Daniel Polette in 2016. She previously referred to him as her stepfather before they married.Polette had started raping her when she was only 12 or 13, according to court documents. At that time he was her mother's boyfriend; he later became Bacot's husband and father of their four children. --- step parents, male or female, are more likely to abuse a kid. You stay married and don't subject your kids to the risk. If true I don't know if I have a problem with this. Grooming and repeated rape. Dude deserves death. Doesn't necessarily make her fit for the public though.
If true, she was absolutely right in killing him.
Grooming, trauma bond, Stockholm syndrome. You're thinking like a rational person, not someone who's been subjected to years of abuse.
Do you recall the case of the Austrian Fritzl? Even if we assume that your view of the world is correct, the idea that abuse victims (actual ones) who have been abused all their lives will act in a remotely rational way is doubtful. The only reason Fritzl was caught is because he sent someone who was wounded to the hospital instead of letting the kid die.
Yes, this seems like a very hard case. But given the amount of stuff that is alleged, if even a small portion is true, it would justify offing him in my mind. On the other hand, you don't want to give people the right to kill others based on unsubstantiated claims.
How many reasons are we up to now not to marry western women?
If you absolutely feel the need to get married, do what Eddie Murphy joked about: find yourself a bush bitch and keep her the hell out of the states, or any western nation for that matter.
You are insane. A convicted child rapist was shot by his child bride, and you and the prosecutor think that the victim should be punished for this.
Again: convicted child rapist.
She is not the man behind the curtain who orchestrated her step-father's arrest and conviction for raping another girl.
Stop acting like every piece of shit with a Y chromosome is your ally.
Paid shills, ladies and gents! This is the caliber of desk jockey they send here.
How about you quote something someone actually says for once, instead of making something up and debunking your strawman more retarded than your one-balled Fuehrer?
The unmitigated irony from the inhuman communist. How pathetic.
Only when called out did you finally manage to do that, and that probably only once.
I'm a communist now? What's your proof?
I love how you think anyone is going to take your reductio ad absurdum fallacies seriously. I also love how you’re too fucking retarded to even know what a “quote” is. Keep replying. Defend shill accounts. It looks great on you.
You call literally everyone who doesn't call for the immediate murder of all the Joooz a 'paid shill'. Because the only reasonable explanation for not partaking of your retardation is being paid. I wish being sane came with remuneration, but it doesn't.
Again, yes, you remain funny. That’s why you get replies. Also because you are demonstrably wrong about everything you say. Cry harder about it or just stop posting proven lies.
Literally no one gives a single flying fuck.
No one gives a shit about you. You just don’t matter at all, except insofar as you’re wrong about everything you say, which makes it fun to expose your paid shilling.
lol, dipshit paid shill thinks that his reductio ad absurdum fallacy will be accepted
Stop lying and you’ll stop being replied to.
Wait, is he actually here because he's following you?
HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA THIS IS WHAT THE PAID SHILL ACTUALLY BELIEVES. IT’S SO FUCKING SOLIPSISTIC THAT IT THINKS THE WORLD EXISTS ONLY TO CATER TO ITS WHIMSHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHA
For all my disagreements with him, he actually seems like a fairly OK person to have a beer with, while you just appear as a maladjusted, raving psycho who can't shut up about how much he hates da Joooooooooz.
You can’t get payed to shill for the alt right, no one is offering Tallest cash, he’s well meaning but overly aggressive.