And? What is wrong with food from other places? Don't tell me, you believe in pure culinary, and you disavow any seasoning, fruits, veggies and even meat from other places that were not native of Germany, right?
It doesn't follow that the existence of an international food and spice trade requires that a nation have a loose immigration policy.
You could in fact have a nation with a zero immigration policy that still participates in the international food trade. And indeed many nations around the world have tighter immigration policies than the US but still participate in the international food trade.
What is being done here is giving an exchange of culture in which both locals and foreigner can enjoy. And if allowed to prosper generate new culture or dishes. After all, rock came from jazz, and jazz came from African culture. Anime wouldn't exist if it wasn't for American culture in JAPAN. This is what I am advocating for. Stop being SJWs in which cultural appropriation is frowned upon.
Japan appropriated and assimilated large swaths of Western culture after WWII while maintaining what is effectively a closed border. Which is my point. Japanese musicians after some practice can play jazz; they don't need to import American musicians just so they can have jazz concerts.
Do you think cities in Japan put on "Eat Up the Borders" events where they raise financial aid for foreigners to start businesses?
Japanese musicians after some practice can play jazz; they don't need to import American musicians just so they can have jazz concerts.
That is strawmanning my argument.
My argument was that without mixing of cultures we wouldn't have Jazz, which then gave rise to rock, and eventually metal. Not that Japanese people couldn't play Jazz, or needed an American to do so. My argument was that anime was a byproduct of that culture swap with Americans.
Nowhere did I advocate open borders, or uncontrolled migrations.
The parent to this thread's objection to this festival was that it celebrated mass migration:
It's an organization that helps immigrant-founded businesses to get an edge on white Americans. This festival was meant to be a celebration of diversity and flooding the US with foreigners.
So then I'm not sure where your disagreement is coming from if you aren't opposed to restrictions on immigration, as no one was objecting to people eating food from other cultures. They were objecting to leftists using that as a jump-off point to other policies.
Fine, only foods native from your country, no mixing of any dish, seasoning, fruits or anything. If goes are not native from your country, ditch it. If chickens are not, ditch it. If onions are not native from your country, ditch it. Potatoes? Ditch it.
Don't listen to rock, to metal, or classical music either. Unless you are Japanese, no anime for you.
after backlash ensued, the entire event was forced to cancel
Hahah.
"in order to best serve our guests, we decided to remove one of our food vendors for Sunday's event so that we could deliver an optimal experience for all"
"give vendors from all nationalities a platform to showcase their talents"
Clearly each nation should get their own event and only their own citizens should attend lest they become offended at the other. I'm sure that is the original intent of "Eat Up the Borders" to keep everyone separate. lol
Consumeproduct hates "Jews", but I dont think any of them would actually do anything to them. The "Jews" create enough of their own monsters that turn on them.
Shame the actual Jews havent existed in any significant numbers for nearly 2 millennia.
jew vs jew promoted by blaze (levin and beck) aka diversity of many through the lens of one.
Why is there an immigrant street food festival; when free market capitalism immigrates food from all over the world? Ignoring that free market does not exist under usury based fiat currency, and that the "free" market immigration of working slaves alongside all the food, is destroying all national food cuisines anyway...aren't diversity festivities ritualistic ignorance towards the destruction of the differences established by nations? And by nation I don't mean the flag owned by the representative parasites; but a nation as in "a people"?
antisemitic attack
What would be the implication for antisemitism if going to the options and disabling friendly fire?
I strangely find myself agreeing with you for some part. Immigrant street food festival is a stupid concept but it gives a feel of authenticity and it works. You buy foreign food from foreigners because of psychology and not objectivity, this in the context were the best Italian food I had was in Florence in a restaurant where the chef was from Egypt and the rest of the staff was from Romania and Russia.
As for the attack being anti-semetic, the only reason given in the article is that the vendor is claiming it is anti-semetic. I'm no longer willing to give victimhood status without no other form of proof to anyone.
As a distraction from the corruption that is immigration to nations (to people through miscegenation). The parasites use capitalism to sell the idea of culture as a distraction from cultivating it ourselves, which they suppress.
The implication of uniting all nations (UN) is the destruction of all differences among people, and nature segregates differences to inspire our senses to adhere to self sustenance.
How to prevent any so called race from defending itself against miscegenation? Racism aka the rhetorical suggestion that only allows to blame others for hate; while not offering the rhetoric to love ones own. Offense without defense.
the only reason given in the article is that the vendor is claiming it is anti-semetic
What does antisemitism represent? A suggested -ism aka a belief system pro"claimed" by the free will of one towards the consent by the free will of choice of another one. If one consents; one finds himself divided into the conflict of reason aka believers vs non-believers reasoning about what they believe/not believe is true/false.
In short...reason represents division by suggestion of belief (-ism). The few control the many through suggestion (primarily) and force (secondarily).
I'm no longer willing to give victimhood status without no other form of proof to anyone.
VIC'TIM noun [Latin victima.] - "a living being sacrificed to some deity, or in the performance of a religious rite" also "something sacrificed in the pursuit of an object" aka falling for temptation by choice of action (free will).
The act of consenting to the suggestions of others aka believing represents self sacrifice (ignorance) of comprehension (understanding aka ONEs potential within ALL).
Status refers to value and we are being deceived by suggestion to ignore the highest value in ALL existence...ONEs free will of choice to evaluate it ALL.
As for proof...life moving from inception towards death represents form within flow, and flow represents constant change. So tell me...how does form define proof (true/false) within constant change (flow) without ignoring change?
DISTRACTION, noun [Latin] - "the act of distracting; a drawing apart; separation" aka the pull of flow tempting form to choose to ignore self sustenance as form to flow. That choice of ignorance is what causes the parasitic exploitation by those who use suggestion of temptation to keep us distracted from adherence to self sustenance (need) through temptations (want).
I think it is likely but it would be hypocritical of me to take it at face valor. The chance is high the reasons are antisemetic but I can't hold double standards in good faith.
kinda reminds me of that news about the family jews that were kicked off the plane and claimed antisemitism, while the crew and the other passengers said they just really really stink
It's possible, but that does not make it intelligent. I have honestly yet to see the first good argument for the disproportionate hatred that Israel receives from certain people.
Their free will of choice. I don't judge by reason (true vs false); I adapt in accordance to implication (if/then) to whatever inspires me.
probably because you sound like an autist
Autism; yet another suggested belief system defined by those who suggest it towards those who consent to believe it. Anyway; what represents a bigger difficulty of communication than to describe a system with words that doesn't use words to describe itself?
Simulacra are copies that depict things that either had no original, or that no longer have an original.
As form within flow ONE transmutes out of ALL offered. Creation (out of nothing) represents the parasite suggested inversion of transmutation (out of everything/ALL). The origin of all action (both flow and form aka motion and momentum) represents energy aka the source of ALL information (potentiality) for ONEs (potential) within.
ONE within ALL and ALL is ONE in energy. We represent a potential of the origin (energy) and we can only copy the potentiality we perceive.
Simulation is the imitation of the operation of a real-world process or system over time.
Motion (velocity) causes momentum (resistance) and so the temporary form within momentum needs to adapt to the ongoing flow of motion to sustain itself.
The real word process represents the self sustenance of energy aka the source of ALL information (potentiality); within which flow (loss of potentiality) and form (recharge through the resistance of potential) are operating. ONE acts by free will of choice upon ALL perceived inspiration; which depending on choice (need or want) will be transmuted into comprehended information.
As for S&S under the parasite system...forms choice of ignorance (want over need) towards flow allows other form to suggest "true" though words as suggested idols in exchange for consent by free will to believe them. They then can contradict the believed truth with "false"; which puts us into the conflict of reason (true vs false). That's entirely fiction (believed information) in ignorance of reality (perceived inspiration).
Simulacra equals believing suggested information by another ONE; Simulation equals adaptation to perceived inspiration from ALL.
And of course the parasites wouldn't give us access to S&S without also inverting it...
SIM'ULACHER, noun [Latin simulacrum.] "an image".
SIMULA'TION, noun [Latin simulation ] - "the act of feigning to be that which is not"
Yet somehow anti-semitism is associated with the "right wing"?
(in actuality, there's plenty of anti-jew or anti-israeli sentiment on both sides, but the right-wing has never had any power)
Neonazis are left wing, after all they believe in socialism, and socialism is inherently left wing.
That's why...
But, you are right on that regard though.
And? What is wrong with food from other places? Don't tell me, you believe in pure culinary, and you disavow any seasoning, fruits, veggies and even meat from other places that were not native of Germany, right?
It doesn't follow that the existence of an international food and spice trade requires that a nation have a loose immigration policy.
You could in fact have a nation with a zero immigration policy that still participates in the international food trade. And indeed many nations around the world have tighter immigration policies than the US but still participate in the international food trade.
What is being done here is giving an exchange of culture in which both locals and foreigner can enjoy. And if allowed to prosper generate new culture or dishes. After all, rock came from jazz, and jazz came from African culture. Anime wouldn't exist if it wasn't for American culture in JAPAN. This is what I am advocating for. Stop being SJWs in which cultural appropriation is frowned upon.
Japan appropriated and assimilated large swaths of Western culture after WWII while maintaining what is effectively a closed border. Which is my point. Japanese musicians after some practice can play jazz; they don't need to import American musicians just so they can have jazz concerts.
Do you think cities in Japan put on "Eat Up the Borders" events where they raise financial aid for foreigners to start businesses?
That is strawmanning my argument.
My argument was that without mixing of cultures we wouldn't have Jazz, which then gave rise to rock, and eventually metal. Not that Japanese people couldn't play Jazz, or needed an American to do so. My argument was that anime was a byproduct of that culture swap with Americans.
Nowhere did I advocate open borders, or uncontrolled migrations.
The parent to this thread's objection to this festival was that it celebrated mass migration:
So then I'm not sure where your disagreement is coming from if you aren't opposed to restrictions on immigration, as no one was objecting to people eating food from other cultures. They were objecting to leftists using that as a jump-off point to other policies.
My objection was the antisemitism, and that culinary exchange generates new stuff.
The objection is with other people objecting to the cultural exchange. As in, acting like SJWs act when they find "cultural appropriation"
Fine, only foods native from your country, no mixing of any dish, seasoning, fruits or anything. If goes are not native from your country, ditch it. If chickens are not, ditch it. If onions are not native from your country, ditch it. Potatoes? Ditch it.
Don't listen to rock, to metal, or classical music either. Unless you are Japanese, no anime for you.
Ah, without any arguments you chose strawman. Typical of a loser.
I was very clear, you took it out of context, creating a strawman so you could have something to cling on and attack me.
Hahah.
Clearly each nation should get their own event and only their own citizens should attend lest they become offended at the other. I'm sure that is the original intent of "Eat Up the Borders" to keep everyone separate. lol
Of course, after all certain demographic bad, only the left's loved demographics are allowed!
Consumeproduct hates "Jews", but I dont think any of them would actually do anything to them. The "Jews" create enough of their own monsters that turn on them.
Shame the actual Jews havent existed in any significant numbers for nearly 2 millennia.
ThE lEfT iS tHe ReAl AnTiSeMiTe!
Why is there an immigrant street food festival; when free market capitalism immigrates food from all over the world? Ignoring that free market does not exist under usury based fiat currency, and that the "free" market immigration of working slaves alongside all the food, is destroying all national food cuisines anyway...aren't diversity festivities ritualistic ignorance towards the destruction of the differences established by nations? And by nation I don't mean the flag owned by the representative parasites; but a nation as in "a people"?
What would be the implication for antisemitism if going to the options and disabling friendly fire?
I strangely find myself agreeing with you for some part. Immigrant street food festival is a stupid concept but it gives a feel of authenticity and it works. You buy foreign food from foreigners because of psychology and not objectivity, this in the context were the best Italian food I had was in Florence in a restaurant where the chef was from Egypt and the rest of the staff was from Romania and Russia.
As for the attack being anti-semetic, the only reason given in the article is that the vendor is claiming it is anti-semetic. I'm no longer willing to give victimhood status without no other form of proof to anyone.
One of the best Italian restaurants around me is run by a pair of immigrant brothers from Ethiopia.
As a distraction from the corruption that is immigration to nations (to people through miscegenation). The parasites use capitalism to sell the idea of culture as a distraction from cultivating it ourselves, which they suppress.
The implication of uniting all nations (UN) is the destruction of all differences among people, and nature segregates differences to inspire our senses to adhere to self sustenance.
How to prevent any so called race from defending itself against miscegenation? Racism aka the rhetorical suggestion that only allows to blame others for hate; while not offering the rhetoric to love ones own. Offense without defense.
What does antisemitism represent? A suggested -ism aka a belief system pro"claimed" by the free will of one towards the consent by the free will of choice of another one. If one consents; one finds himself divided into the conflict of reason aka believers vs non-believers reasoning about what they believe/not believe is true/false.
In short...reason represents division by suggestion of belief (-ism). The few control the many through suggestion (primarily) and force (secondarily).
VIC'TIM noun [Latin victima.] - "a living being sacrificed to some deity, or in the performance of a religious rite" also "something sacrificed in the pursuit of an object" aka falling for temptation by choice of action (free will).
The act of consenting to the suggestions of others aka believing represents self sacrifice (ignorance) of comprehension (understanding aka ONEs potential within ALL).
Status refers to value and we are being deceived by suggestion to ignore the highest value in ALL existence...ONEs free will of choice to evaluate it ALL.
As for proof...life moving from inception towards death represents form within flow, and flow represents constant change. So tell me...how does form define proof (true/false) within constant change (flow) without ignoring change?
DISTRACTION, noun (From Latin dis- "apart, asunder, away" + trahere "to drag")
DISTRACTION, noun [Latin] - "the act of distracting; a drawing apart; separation" aka the pull of flow tempting form to choose to ignore self sustenance as form to flow. That choice of ignorance is what causes the parasitic exploitation by those who use suggestion of temptation to keep us distracted from adherence to self sustenance (need) through temptations (want).
Wants tempt us away from needs.
SUSTENANCE, noun (From Latin sustinēre "to uphold")
Uphold form within flow aka balance by adaptation; which requires choice of action.
CHOICE, noun (From Old English cēosan, akin to Greek geúesthai "to enjoy", Latin gustāre "to taste")
Because the vender was Jewish and from Israel. And you know people use anti-Israel attacks as a cover to their antisemitism.
I think it is likely but it would be hypocritical of me to take it at face valor. The chance is high the reasons are antisemetic but I can't hold double standards in good faith.
Maybe some do, but it doesn't mean every anti-Israel attack is a cover for antisemitism, this specific removal notwithstanding.
kinda reminds me of that news about the family jews that were kicked off the plane and claimed antisemitism, while the crew and the other passengers said they just really really stink
I agree.
But let's hear all your good reasons for hating Israel, and the obsessive focus on one small country with a small population.
What are standards for what a good ally is, and how does Israel not only fail to satisfy that, but earn the moniker 'terrible' ally?
Show me that there is such influence, let alone influence that is in that nice weasel word 'undue'.
Unfortunately, attacking Israel has been the main go to in an attempt to avoid the negative impacts of attacking Jews so freely.
If you press these people spouting anti-Israel nonsense, eventually they let out their antisemitism out at full view.
If you're going after a jewish immigrant in America then yeah it's a little tough to spin that one as just opposing Israel.
So it'd be totally fine to do this to a Russian, Turk, or Pole right?
It's possible, but that does not make it intelligent. I have honestly yet to see the first good argument for the disproportionate hatred that Israel receives from certain people.
That's not a credible claim for a person with internet access.
Their free will of choice. I don't judge by reason (true vs false); I adapt in accordance to implication (if/then) to whatever inspires me.
Autism; yet another suggested belief system defined by those who suggest it towards those who consent to believe it. Anyway; what represents a bigger difficulty of communication than to describe a system with words that doesn't use words to describe itself?
As form within flow ONE transmutes out of ALL offered. Creation (out of nothing) represents the parasite suggested inversion of transmutation (out of everything/ALL). The origin of all action (both flow and form aka motion and momentum) represents energy aka the source of ALL information (potentiality) for ONEs (potential) within.
ONE within ALL and ALL is ONE in energy. We represent a potential of the origin (energy) and we can only copy the potentiality we perceive.
Motion (velocity) causes momentum (resistance) and so the temporary form within momentum needs to adapt to the ongoing flow of motion to sustain itself.
The real word process represents the self sustenance of energy aka the source of ALL information (potentiality); within which flow (loss of potentiality) and form (recharge through the resistance of potential) are operating. ONE acts by free will of choice upon ALL perceived inspiration; which depending on choice (need or want) will be transmuted into comprehended information.
As for S&S under the parasite system...forms choice of ignorance (want over need) towards flow allows other form to suggest "true" though words as suggested idols in exchange for consent by free will to believe them. They then can contradict the believed truth with "false"; which puts us into the conflict of reason (true vs false). That's entirely fiction (believed information) in ignorance of reality (perceived inspiration).
Simulacra equals believing suggested information by another ONE; Simulation equals adaptation to perceived inspiration from ALL.
And of course the parasites wouldn't give us access to S&S without also inverting it...
SIM'ULACHER, noun [Latin simulacrum.] "an image".
SIMULA'TION, noun [Latin simulation ] - "the act of feigning to be that which is not"
Exactly