Upvoted but; if they can bury the Epstein/Clinton/Prince Andrew story, and they can shrug their shoulders at the Las Vegas shootout, cover up large scale gun runners like Jeffery Allen Lash, and drag Julian Assange through three presidential administrations, it doesn't seem likely the msm is going to cover this.
I read that the NYT got a pulitzer prize today for their coverage of covid/
When the leaders of Social Media recently testified, a Democrat forced them to admit that the vaccines were approved (misinformation), and that they'll ban misinformation. There's also the "fortified" election.
It's also illegal for the government to spy on citizens without a warrant, but if they get Big Tech to set up systems to allow the government to do exactly that (for payment or other benefit), apparently that's fine. Not that the government needs to follow the law anymore.
PENTAGON PLANS TO MONITOR SOCIAL MEDIA OF MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR EXTREMIST CONTENT
The military has previously balked at surveilling service members for extremist political views due to First Amendment protections.
Ken Klippenstein
May 17 2021, 8:25 p.m.
AS PART OF the Biden administration’s crackdown on domestic extremism, the Pentagon plans to launch a pilot program for screening social media content for extremist material, according to internal Defense Department documents reviewed by The Intercept, as well as a source with direct knowledge of the program.
An extremism steering committee led by Bishop Garrison, a senior adviser to the secretary of defense, is currently designing the social media screening pilot program, which will “continuously” monitor military personnel for “concerning behaviors,” according to a Pentagon briefing in late March. Although in the past the military has balked at surveilling service members for extremist political views due to First Amendment protections, the pilot program will rely on a private surveillance firm in order to circumvent First Amendment restrictions on government monitoring, according to a senior Pentagon official. Though the firm has not yet been selected, the current front runner is Babel Street, a company that sells powerful surveillance tools including social media monitoring software.
Look, I'm all in favor of minimal government regulation, because it almost always goes badly. But we've had years of these companies who have a near monopoly on social media communication blatantly censoring things along political lines and actively suppressing any attempt at starting a competitor, often with outright slander. And now we have documents saying that federal officials were involved? Shutting them down isn't good enough. Jail them all.
Upvoted but; if they can bury the Epstein/Clinton/Prince Andrew story, and they can shrug their shoulders at the Las Vegas shootout, cover up large scale gun runners like Jeffery Allen Lash, and drag Julian Assange through three presidential administrations, it doesn't seem likely the msm is going to cover this.
I read that the NYT got a pulitzer prize today for their coverage of covid/
When the leaders of Social Media recently testified, a Democrat forced them to admit that the vaccines were approved (misinformation), and that they'll ban misinformation. There's also the "fortified" election.
It's also illegal for the government to spy on citizens without a warrant, but if they get Big Tech to set up systems to allow the government to do exactly that (for payment or other benefit), apparently that's fine. Not that the government needs to follow the law anymore.
They use big tech as part of the Nine Eyes initiative. US cannot spy on the US, but the UK can... And then they all share information anyway.
https://archive.ph/5DHoT https:// theintercept. com/2021/05/17/military-pentagon-extremism-social-media/
https://archive.ph/mfsf6 https://web.archive.org/web/20210506040841/https://www.revolver.news/2021/05/bishop-garrison-pentagon-hatchet-man/ https://www.revolver.news/2021/05/bishop-garrison-pentagon-hatchet-man/
But muh private platform!
Look, I'm all in favor of minimal government regulation, because it almost always goes badly. But we've had years of these companies who have a near monopoly on social media communication blatantly censoring things along political lines and actively suppressing any attempt at starting a competitor, often with outright slander. And now we have documents saying that federal officials were involved? Shutting them down isn't good enough. Jail them all.
Waow this is just like muh favorite Netflix shoe!
The government will protect you're rights lmao.
Pretty easy to protect nothing.
So is reddit, google, facebook, instagram....
I am one of them. My 4th account has been sitting at "currently suspended" since early May.
Anyone who uses twitter or crys about twitter should kill themselves