Das Kapital
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
It's not evolution, it's decades of dehumanization expressly for this purpose.
Do you think it didn't happen before feminism? Hot women were always treated best.
Women have always been treated at least slightly better due to being seen CORRECTLY as a resource. They have always been treated well compared to men but they have never been treated this well.
Feminism advocates for women's superiority by proclaiming women are born equal to men, thus men never being able to give society the same value as a resource, men will inevitably be treated more inferior than they have ever been treated. When women are "born equal to a man", they are essentially treated almost like a deity because they will have the value of men plus the value of a resource.
Men growing up & not giving the same resource value as women will be seen as defective. Men will have to be cogs in the machine, just to measure up.
They're a resource like Bitcoin has been recently. Temperamental, backed mostly by cultlike movements and burning everyone that touches it.
I don't think people ever threw copious amounts of money at women they could never obtain before female supremacists took over the schools and culture, telling them that they are worthless and women are their superiors.
I'd ask how they sleep at night, but I'm 99.9999999999% sure that they don't feel a single bit of shame or remorse for exploiting broken people.
It's all well and good talking about biology, but it does not fit here. These people are throwing money just to be complimented. Just to be fucking noticed. Just to be treated like fellow human beings. They don't actually think she'll fuck them, they just think she'll be nice to them.
OnlyFans trash are lower than amoeba.
Plus the internet makes it easier than ever for all the loser men to group around these chicks on their massive pedestals.
But then why do men keep investing into females that are not biologically viable e.g. not interested or not fertile?
It's feminism that did this, decades of it.
Then why was it not always this way? If it's simply biological, then it would have been. Women did not wield this much power in the past because men did not allow them to.
If you're right, then women can't be fixed. That's an even more pessimistic view of them than I have.
No it is not. I'm just going to quote a post I made before regarding this subject.
I am not even allowed to name THEM here but Feminism is an ideology born out of Marxism and Marxism is born out of a certain religious & ethnic group of people who are matriarchal . THEY put women on a pedestal and THEY hate men.
Dowries
A dowry was paid by a bride’s father. It was a token of gratitude and resource sharing, plus it severed the woman’s interest in her father’s estate because at common law a woman couldn’t own property. It wasn’t some simp buying a woman.
But they did obtain those women.
Someone hasn't read the classics.
Shes not hot though. Remove her makeup and see her for the mediocre women she is.
Men were not always this weak to women though. In the past women knew their place and were kept there by men, now there is no correction at all from the men.
I've got to disagree.
To put it in computer terms.
Hardware = the processor, motherboard, gpu, etc.
Firmware = the lowest level software
Software = what runs on top of the hardware+firmware (linux, macOS, android, windows, whatever)
Very different software can run on the same hardware+firmware, yet all software must share certain constraints and attributes that are limited or allowed by the layers below them.
For humans, the hardware is the body, the firmware is neuro-brain-gunk, and the software is experiences, learning, social demands, etc.
Essentially the same hardware+firmware can support software--societies--that range from Mongolian warriors to Tibetan Buddhists to British Puritans to African hunter gatherer tribes to whatever.
Don't downplay the evolutionary aspect or the biological aspect of things. Human males seem to have some basic need to protect "their" women. The modern definition of "their" seems to be white knighting for social media influencers..
I do agree that social programming probably plays a bigger role, but the one is built on the other.