https://archive.ph/wip/K83op https://spectator.org/teen-vogue-to-teen-girls-marx-good-reagan-bad/
Teen Vogue to Teen Girls: Marx Good, Reagan Bad
Trendy ignorance never had it so good.
by PAUL KENGOR July 20, 2020, 12:06 AM
That Teen Vogue gem, “Who Is Karl Marx: Meet the Anti-Capitalist Scholar,” informs girls how Marx’s “ideas can still teach us about the past and present.” Among those ideas: “There’s this myth of the free market, but Marx shows very clearly that capitalism emerged through a state of violence.”
“My wife, alas, delivered a girl and not a boy,” he regretted to his partner, Friedrich Engels, of his wife Jenny’s deficient birthing abilities. Marx would later lament to one of his daughters, who likewise gave birth to a girl: “I congratulate you on the happy delivery…. I prefer the ‘male’ sex among children who will be born at this turning point in history.”
Marx’s daughters lived lives of hopelessness and despair. In fact, four of Marx’s six children died before he did, including his oldest daughter. Marx’s two surviving daughters committed suicide in joint suicide pacts with their husbands.
As for the sons-in-law, that was another unhappy tale. Marx detested both, whom he viewed as idiots. He wished: “To hell with both of them!” He particularly disliked Laura’s husband, Paul, whom Marx ridiculed as “Negrillo” or “The Gorilla” because he was half Cuban and had some “Negro” blood in his veins.
Actually, it isn’t quite right to say that Lenchen worked for the Marx family, given that she toiled without pay, almost like an indentured servant for life, as Karl’s chattel. The champion of the proletariat never paid Lenchen a penny. The stumpy, frumpy girl gave her everything to the Marx household.
Karl, who refused to bathe, groom, and suffered from boils all over his body (including his penis), eventually bedded Lenchen behind Jenny’s back. Historians have no idea how often or the exact circumstances, including whether or not Marx’s use of Lenchen as sexual receptacle was consensual. Wrote one biographer (Robert Payne): “That she was virtually his bondslave was a matter of entire indifference to him. It was enough that she was available to serve his sexual needs…. We shall probably never know whether he raped or seduced the servant, though the large number of images concerned with rape in his later writings suggest that it was rape rather than seduction. In due course a child was born.”
https://archive.ph/ywIHF https://spectator.org/cancel-karl-marx/
Why Not Cancel Karl Marx?
Racism and anti-Semitism were second nature to him, and yet the cancel culture gives him a free pass every time.
by PAUL KENGOR August 18, 2020, 12:01 AM
Consider how Marx spoke of his own son-in-law, Paul Lafargue, husband of his daughter Laura. Paul came from Cuba, born in Santiago, and Marx thus viewed him as marred by “Negro” blood and denigrated him as “Negrillo” or “the Gorilla.” Karl never let up his ridicule of poor Paul. In November 1882, still 14 years after Lafargue and Laura married, Marx complained to Engels that “Lafargue has the blemish customarily found in the negro tribe — no sense of shame, by which I mean shame about making a fool of oneself.”
Marx had a friendly audience for such views in Friedrich Engels, his Communist Manifesto partner. Engels, a proud Darwinian, averred that Paul possessed “one-eighth or one-twelfth nigger blood.” In 1887, Lafargue had been a political candidate for a council seat in a Paris district that contained a zoo. In an April 1887 letter to Paul’s wife, Engels cruelly opined, “Being in his quality as a nigger, a degree nearer to the rest of the animal kingdom than the rest of us, he is undoubtedly the most appropriate representative of that district.”
It is no wonder that Marx’s son-in-law had such low self-esteem. In fact, one day in November 1911, Paul ended it all. He killed himself in a suicide pact with Marx’s daughter. In fact, two of Marx’s daughters killed themselves in suicide pacts with their husbands.
Karl Marx freely dispensed with nasty epithets aimed not only at blacks but at Jews. Biographer Jonathan Sperber notes that Marx’s correspondence is “filled with contemptuous remarks about Jews.” Even his admiring biographer Francis Wheen, who habitually defends nearly everything about Marx, admits that he “sprayed anti-Semitic insults at his enemies with savage glee.”
Of one contemporary, Marx blasted his “cynical, oily-obtrusive, phony-Baronial Jew-manners.” Particularly loathsome to Marx was anyone he suspected of part Jewish and African roots. Marx referred to his fellow German socialist Ferdinand Lassalle as a “greasy Jew,” “the little kike,” “water-polack Jew,” “Jew Braun,” “Yid,” “Izzy,” “Wily Ephraim,” “Baron Itzig,” and “the Jewish Nigger.” In a July 1862 letter to Engels, Marx confidently observed of Lassalle, “It is now perfectly clear to me that, as the shape of his head and the growth of his hair indicates, he is descended from the Negroes who joined in Moses’ flight from Egypt.” Lassalle’s “cranial formation,” detected Marx, was the giveaway. Marx did, however, allow for an exception: “unless his mother or grandmother on the father’s side was crossed with a nigger.” Marx chortled, “This union of Jew and German on a Negro base was bound to produce an extraordinary hybrid.” He also hastened to add, “The fellow’s importunity is also niggerlike.”
Karl Marx summed it up plainly in a letter to his longtime friend Arnold Ruge in 1843: “the Israelite faith is repulsive to me.”
https://archive.ph/Hj4AA https://www.dailysignal.com/2017/05/10/ugly-racism-karl-marx/
The Ugly Racism of Karl Marx
Walter E. Williams / @WE_Williams / May 10, 2017
For example, Marx didn’t think much of Mexicans. When the United States annexed California after the Mexican War, Marx sarcastically asked, “Is it a misfortune that magnificent California was seized from the lazy Mexicans who did not know what to do with it?”
Engels shared Marx’s contempt for Mexicans, explaining: “In America we have witnessed the conquest of Mexico and have rejoiced at it. It is to the interest of its own development that Mexico will be placed under the tutelage of the United States.”
Marx had a racial vision that might be interesting to his modern-day black supporters. In a letter to Engels, in reference to his socialist political competitor Ferdinand Lassalle, Marx wrote:
It is now completely clear to me that he, as is proved by his cranial formation and his hair, descends from the Negroes who had joined Moses’ exodus from Egypt, assuming that his mother or grandmother on the paternal side had not interbred with a n—–. Now this union of Judaism and Germanism with a basic Negro substance must produce a peculiar product.
Engels shared Marx’s racial philosophy. In 1887, Paul Lafargue, who was Marx’s son-in-law, was a candidate for a council seat in a Paris district that contained a zoo. Engels claimed that Lafargue had “one-eighth or one-twelfth n—– blood.”
In a letter to Lafargue’s wife, Engels wrote, “Being in his quality as a n—–, a degree nearer to the rest of the animal kingdom than the rest of us, he is undoubtedly the most appropriate representative of that district.”
Marx was also an anti-Semite, as seen in his essay titled “On the Jewish Question,” which was published in 1844. Marx asked:
What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money. … Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist. Money degrades all the gods of man—and turns them into commodities. … The bill of exchange is the real god of the Jew. His god is only an illusory bill of exchange. … The chimerical nationality of the Jew is the nationality of the merchant, of the man of money in general.
-t. leftist
The real lie was, we were told to expect people like pakis and chinks to feel solidarity with us.
Karl Marx's Anti-Semitism by Tik History
Marxism is explicitly racist. The entire definition of Capitalism can be effectively translated to Cultural Jewry, or the secularized version of Judaism, which (to Marx) is the worship of money as a commodity. Non-Jews that engage in what Marx describes as Jewish cultural behavior (like 'huckstering') are "inwardly circumcised", which is effectively another way of saying "internalized jewishness", like 'internalized whiteness' or 'internalized misogyny'.
Marxism is basically a massive antisemitic rant turned into an ideology, and it's no wonder that the Left can't actually tamp down on genuine antisemitism within their own ranks (like with the British Labour Party recently).
Honestly, Hitler's behaviors make a fuckton of sense when you understand that he was applying Marxist antisemitism back to Socialism, and very literally carrying it out. The Holocaust requires a Marxist interpretation of the world. The fundamental difference between Hitler and Marx is that National Socialism descended from State Socialism rather than Marx's more anachro-Socialist perspective. If the State was the harbinger of Socialist revolution, the removal of Judaism from the Socialized body politic was not going to happen simply because people embraced Socialism. The Jews, Judaism, and Cultural Jewry, by definition, had to be removed from society by the state in order for the society to be truly Socialized.
Hitler clearly read Marx, and then applied it. A genocide is a necessary step in applying Marxism.
That is also the same reason that the Left should not be allowed to deny it's anti-White rhetoric either. It's the same pre-genocidal rhetoric and perspective which requires a genocide to be applied.
All that the Left typically does is change who gets genocided. Jews, Rich people, corporate executives, Whites, Men, Straights, Cisgenders, etc. It doesn't matter. It's the same equation with the variable names changing.
The man literally wrote "On The Jewish Question". You're ignoring shit really hard right now.
"Islamo-Leftism doesn't real" K.
There was nothing mystical about the Blood and Soil argument. Hitler was quite clear about how he believed only Aryans were physically capable of forming nations as an element of their 'Blood'. The concept of the Volk is a fundamentally German concept, not a National Socialist one.
Where Marx was purely materialist the Fascists and National Socialists pushed that the people must be fed a heroic narrative in order to Socialize them. The criticism is, again, more along the lines of State Socialism. The people won't just one day come to see the light of Socialism. They must be socialized and synchronized into a body politic through the state. The romantic elements of Fascism and National Socialism are there as narrative devices for the population to unify around. They were not non-material ideology.
This is never going to stop being funny. "Everyone who opposes National Socialism and White Identitarianism must be a Jew". It's an extension of my Capitalism, comrade. Maybe you'll call me "inwardly circumcised" too!
I don't need to tether antisemitism to Marxism. Marxism is a sub-category of antisemitism. It's like trying to tether and engine to a car: it's part of the car already.
The only thing you can attempt to accuse me of doing is making Fascists and National Socialists into Marxists. But I didn't do that, you're going to do that to yourselves. You just don't want to be honest about it.
hitler, to fight marxism and communism and jews, became a marxist communist jew.
i am happy i sit with my little apes in consumeproduct.win, i could never handle the raw galaxy brain 500 iq on display here. i think my head would pop from the raw knowledge and truth being spouted.
Hitler was always a Socialist.
He didn't become a communist or a jew because those are different things. You just don't believe that because you accept Judeo-Bolshevism. You'll note he didn't call it Judeo-Socialism, because he was a Socialist.
Yes, communism is racist.
It bars everyone from both their culture and religion, then substitutes it with Marx's own miracle cure-all solution - everyone becomes everybody.
The progressivism of the Nazis shows in their obsession with racial science, which has made a strong comeback. They threw out real answers to hard science problems because Jews came up with it. Now we have progressives declaring 2+2=5 because blacks.
Then they will wonder why they are failing
Why bridges are falling down, planes dropping out of the sky and ships sinking.
National Socialism is very similar to Critical Race Theory/wokeism.
While NatSocs supported white Aryans and despised lesser races;
Wokes supported minorities (everybody the Nazis disliked, pure coincidence I'm sure), and hates whites.
"National Socialism isn't real Socialism! >:( "
Just like Communism, Marxism, Lenninism, Maxist-Lenninism, Trotskyism, Stalinism, Maoism, Titoism, Democratic Socialism, Social Democracy, and Socialism.
...Unless it fucking is.
It is real Socialism. Just not real Marxism. Socialism as a concept predates Marxism and National Socialism explicitly rejects Marxism.
I won't get into any debate on the merits of NatSoc as an economic system, I just wanted to point that fact out.