Mayor: No matter what the jury says, he's guilty ?
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (63)
sorted by:
Wow, women's grasp of law is finally infecting others.
"He's guilty because we accused him"
That's just the usual understanding of justice of the left: anyone not on the left is always guilty no matter what they did, anyone on the left is always innocent no matter what they did.
Fair point. The left does stick by their people no matter what, while the right is held back by pesky things like morals and greater good.
Eh, it's more they need to evict somebody from the left before they can gulag them.
which is why I support doing the same wagon circling for our side since they keep picking us off
The left is more on the person is guilty because they are not on the left so if it is not guilty it means that the laws are broken and we need to change them.
Good way of looking at it, they are never wrong and the laws are there to enforce their views. Not unlike religious fanatics.
That's not true. If they are accused of something by someone with more oppression points, then a left winger is always guilty as well. Though, they're then retroactively branded as "Far Right", so I guess you're sort of right.
"I had a dream he was guilty so he's guilty!"
(an ex literally said this to me once. She was serious.)
It's easy to say this from the comfort of anonymity; but I figure if I were on the jury then I'm damned if I do and damned if I don't, so I'd vote based on the evidence.
Then I'd immediately follow newly made plans to stock up on ammo and move to another state where I have good job opportunities.
Hey now. My female brain is more capable of unbiased critical analysis than many males I see spewing ignorant assumptions and jumping to unwarranted conclusions on this board and elsewhere. Am I an exception? Perhaps. But you should not paint ANY demographic with a single brush. C’mon, man!
Males have more variance. This is a known phenomenon.
Your thinly veiled attack has been noted.
Huh? That was no attack. Sheesh! Just a reminder not to make such sweeping generalizations.
But your defensive hostility has been noted.
I believe he was making a point
NOT ALL
It is wrong to generalize all men as a monolith of abusers and monsters.
It is perfectly fine to generalize all women as a monolith of abusers and monsters.
Apparently.
The difference being that the former gets you the Presidency while the latter gets you fired from any job.
I was on a jury last year, consisting of twelve white guys. Shit was cash. We had some twists and turns, but we pretty much arrived at a consensus that the accused was guilty of all charges. We only had two emotional holdouts, because the charges were pretty severe for the acts involved, even though they technically qualified.
One of the holdouts relented on the final charge, while the other admitted that while he believed the defendant did what he was accused of, he couldn't in good conscience say he was guilty, because he felt the court's charges were overzealous. It wasn't his place to do this, but thankfully, the judge told us that 11-1 would suffice in that scenario and finally let us go free.