Okay man, I'll be sure to not cross the street at night when there's a poorly dressed black man coming at me. Wouldn't want to be racist. "Black" isn't a relevant variable.
I know statistically that an overwhelming amount of violent crime is committed by blacks relative to population, but I wouldnt want people thinking I'm a racist or something. Who knows, maybe he's one of the "not all black people", surely that's worth getting stabbed and mugged for.
It's not worth my time or attention to vet every individual when the majority of voices of such a small minority clearly despise my existence
Okay man, I'll be sure to not cross the street at night when there's a poorly dressed black man coming at me. Wouldn't want to be racist. "Black" isn't a relevant variable.
I note how you made sure to add certain things to make your action more reasonable. "At night". And "poorly dressed". Clearly, it's not just about this guy being black that would worry you in that situation. Presumably, if it were an impeccably dressed black man, you would not cross the street - even when walking at night. Ironically, proving my point that even in your own situation that you carefully constructed to be most favorable to your point, 'black' was not the relevant variable.
Who knows, maybe he's one of the "not all black people", surely that's worth getting stabbed and mugged for.
I assume your point is that you will also be stabbed and mugged if you did not hate on Jews without regard for whether the individuals you are hating on are deserving of hate?
It's not worth my time or attention to vet every individual when the majority of voices of such a small minority clearly despise my existence
Congratulations, you're doing the exact same thing that you wrongly accuse the Jews of doing, and are angry about.
And who are these 'voices' exactly, that you claim 'the majority' despises your existence?
I note how you made sure to add certain things to make your action more reasonable. "At night". And "poorly dressed". Clearly, it's not just about this guy being black that would worry you in that situation. Presumably, if it were an impeccably dressed black man, you would not cross the street - even when walking at night. Ironically, proving my point that even in your own situation that you carefully constructed to be most favorable to your point, 'black' was not the relevant variable.
And yet you completely ignored the qualifier in the initial comment "in media". I don't care about the average Jewish person, the one's who run media outlets and make anti-white, anti-masculine propaganda in the guise of entertainment are worthy of ire.
Congratulations, you're doing the exact same thing that you wrongly accuse the Jews of doing, and are angry about.
If the Jews truly believe that the majority of the Western world hates them for their existence, then its surprising that they have so much influence despite their retardation. People will contort themselves into a pretzel to avoid being called anti-semitic, even here on an anti-PC board. Literally calling me a stormfag for hating people who write articles about how much they want me to cease existence. If that's not worthy of an angry online comment why the fuck are any of us here? Gamers are dead, they don't have to be your audience. Don't hate the journalist writing that though, you're better than that!
And yet you completely ignored the qualifier in the initial comment "in media". I don't care about the average Jewish person, the one's who run media outlets and make anti-white, anti-masculine propaganda in the guise of entertainment are worthy of ire.
So... they're exactly the same as the non-Jews in media. Seems like the relevant variable here is quite obvious, and that you are focusing on the wrong one.
If the Jews truly believe that the majority of the Western world hates them for their existence
Not that idiotic, considering what has happened to them in nearly every country. If you are this outraged over Jews writing piffle, how much more outraged would you be if Jews had committed all sorts of atrocities against your group which resulted in actual death, mayhem and genocide?
People will contort themselves into a pretzel to avoid being called anti-semitic
Don't kid yourself. Blacks regularly stab Jews with no consequence at all. The race-hustler activists such as Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson can incite hatred and even violence against the Jews without any consequence.
They only care about anti-Semitism when they can tar an anti-establishment movement with that label.
Gamers are dead, they don't have to be your audience. Don't hate the journalist writing that though, you're better than that!
Hate the "journalists" all you want. All I said was to not hate people who have nothing to do with those scumbag journalists, and who are as much enemies of those journalists as we are. The elites are enemies of us all.
I've honestly came across maybe a handful of Jews in politics that aren't stereotypical. I always frame it as a political Jewish issue, and not a general one, as I don't know all Jews. While I believe in stereotypes, I take each case as it comes, yet nearly every time they tick all the stereotypical boxes. Explain that to me? Tell me how it's a generalization, when it's the opposite? The issue with political Jews cannot be compared to the issues of the white male, or the white race, as we're far from being the stereotype that they push.
On top of that, as I mentioned on Reddit, every time I come across the worst examples of leftist extremism, it's nearly always a political Jew. They are some of the worst people on the left for pushing the left further and further down the well of madness. They are the main instigators of leftist extremism, if you can't accept that basic truth, you likely hold a bias that cannot be overridden.
Explain what? That Jews in politics happen to fit some stereotypes that you did not specify?
The issue with political Jews cannot be compared to the issues of the white male, or the white race, as we're far from being the stereotype that they push.
You've got a right to be biased against whatever stormfags are, but I hope you're not intending to turn away an ally because of their biases. If you think they're turning away allies over their own bias, I guess it'd be fair, but I haven't noticed them do so.
If you're a member of a given group and you see people accusing you of being evil incarnate because some members of your group who have nothing to do with you are engaged in some nasty stuff, that is not exactly encouragement to side with the good guys.
That's fair. I'm not gonna try to defend people I'm not on personal terms with, and it'd be ridiculous to try to impose my standards of communication on either side of a conflict.
Personally, I can get real loose with my expressions around my irl friends. And I know how it sounds if a bystander overhears. My excuse is that it's one part lazy group labeling and another part emotional release.
I dunno - I don't expect us all to be buddies here, but I hope to see us all work towards similar goals with very little infighting. Maybe that's naive of me.
As far as general optics go, I think we've been improving here with some minor fluctuations. We have an odd bunch, so anyone doing their part to lurk before posting should understand what we're really about...but I have been surprised at the occasional "normie" stumbling in here. So I can understand some concern there.
Personally, I can get real loose with my expressions around my irl friends. And I know how it sounds if a bystander overhears. My excuse is that it's one part lazy group labeling and another part emotional release.
That sort of thing does not concern me. Being free is a good thing, not a bad thing. That said, it is also much different from having a deep ideological commitment to a point of view that vilifies a particular group of people. Make no mistake that any place that allows free speech attracts a good contingent of people who have an obsession with this particular ethnic group, and frankly, they ruin any forum with their nonsense.
I dunno - I don't expect us all to be buddies here, but I hope to see us all work towards similar goals with very little infighting. Maybe that's naive of me.
Then we have to focus on what unites us, which is that SJWs are bad, not something else. In fact, I'd argue that it's a distraction. If people's focus is on the Jews, then they're missing a lot of what happens.
We have an odd bunch, so anyone doing their part to lurk before posting should understand what we're really about...but I have been surprised at the occasional "normie" stumbling in here.
Some people have told me that I need to learn what this place is, or accused me of being a Chinese bot. So at the very least, we are attracting some people not from Reddit.
The difference is that I don't believe this is in any way representative of women as a whole. It's only pointing out that it's not just Jewish women who do this, as Stormfags like to claim. Scapegoating women for the actions of men and women is as bad as scapegoating Jews for the actions of Jews and non-Jews.
Quite apart from being wrong, it's also foolish strategically. We need the support of Jews and non-Jews, men and women, to be able to defeat this menace, and that's not going to happen if you hate on them for no reason.
Not even 'sure', that gives them room to just keep going on about it even more. Just 'whatever' and immediately go back to hammering them on whatever terrible shit they did that they're trying to distract from by flinging accusations at you.
They throw a grenade hoping everyone immediately refocuses on it and forgets about their wrongdoings, the blast damage against people they don't like is just an added bonus.
I'd like to think that's just a troll or even an epic false flag, but what this PetuniaProudlock is saying is largely indistinguishable from the words of a number of contemporary RL Jews who seem awfully determined to make all the goyim gradually hate them & their people, so...
It's obviously a /pol/ fake, and I pity the people who are so deep down the rabbit-hole of their own making that they cannot see it.
Use of 'goyim' and 'yehudim' while writing English is a dead giveaway.
Citing a non-existent quote from one "Rabbi Bronstein", for which I found no record.
Furthermore, this user appears to be a troll. I found an archived version of his old posts, where he does not appear to be a SJW at all, quite the contrary. Although he did simultaneously claim to be 19 years old as well as a 'cop'. https://archive.is/hfjiT
All the people she was arguing with were real accounts all of which got suspended and people have said that they can find the comments on removeddit. I will see if its true or not if not i'll delete
All the people she was arguing with were real accounts
What counts as a "real account"? And how exactly have you verified that they are "real accounts"? I did try to find the accounts for TheDownvoteParade as well, he is suspended, and I could find no archive of his comments.
people have said that they can find the comments on removeddit.
Which ones? The second group of comments I did manage to find, as it was linked in the first. The screenshot is accurate to that extent. However, the quoted comments (which frankly, sound most suspicious of all) are not linked, nor have I been able to find them or the threads in question. If they ever existed, they were likely deleted by the /r/Judaism moderators. I assume they did exist, because if someone in that conversation managed to point out that these comments cannot be found, this would have served less well as propaganda.
The point is not that the comments are fake, but that the individual is not what he claims he is. Most likely, he is a Stormfag-type who is posting this sort of thing to try to "prove" his pre-existing ideas about Jews. It's so ridiculously over-the-top. It's not the kind of thing that a Jew who believed this sort of thing would write, it's quite obvious to me that it's someone pretending to be.
How did it take you 'a while' when it is literally linked in the comment? As I said:
The second group of comments I did manage to find, as it was linked in the first. The screenshot is accurate to that extent. However, the quoted comments (which frankly, sound most suspicious of all) are not linked, nor have I been able to find them or the threads in question.
Appreciate it. I hate for us to become like the SJWs who just believe anything if it fits their narrative.
Note that I think it's likely that these comments were posted at some point, for the reasons specified above. However, I think it's exceedingly unlikely that this individual was what he claimed he was, rather than engaging in what is called 'black propaganda'.
But nah guys, don't point out that it's widely Jewish people spreading hate against you in the media. That's a racist conspiracy theory
"Jew" isn't the relevant variable there, except for people who hated Jews to begin with and were just looking for an excuse.
And any excuse will do for them. Apparently even a /pol/ fake on a website,.
Okay man, I'll be sure to not cross the street at night when there's a poorly dressed black man coming at me. Wouldn't want to be racist. "Black" isn't a relevant variable.
I know statistically that an overwhelming amount of violent crime is committed by blacks relative to population, but I wouldnt want people thinking I'm a racist or something. Who knows, maybe he's one of the "not all black people", surely that's worth getting stabbed and mugged for.
It's not worth my time or attention to vet every individual when the majority of voices of such a small minority clearly despise my existence
I note how you made sure to add certain things to make your action more reasonable. "At night". And "poorly dressed". Clearly, it's not just about this guy being black that would worry you in that situation. Presumably, if it were an impeccably dressed black man, you would not cross the street - even when walking at night. Ironically, proving my point that even in your own situation that you carefully constructed to be most favorable to your point, 'black' was not the relevant variable.
I assume your point is that you will also be stabbed and mugged if you did not hate on Jews without regard for whether the individuals you are hating on are deserving of hate?
Congratulations, you're doing the exact same thing that you wrongly accuse the Jews of doing, and are angry about.
And who are these 'voices' exactly, that you claim 'the majority' despises your existence?
And yet you completely ignored the qualifier in the initial comment "in media". I don't care about the average Jewish person, the one's who run media outlets and make anti-white, anti-masculine propaganda in the guise of entertainment are worthy of ire.
If the Jews truly believe that the majority of the Western world hates them for their existence, then its surprising that they have so much influence despite their retardation. People will contort themselves into a pretzel to avoid being called anti-semitic, even here on an anti-PC board. Literally calling me a stormfag for hating people who write articles about how much they want me to cease existence. If that's not worthy of an angry online comment why the fuck are any of us here? Gamers are dead, they don't have to be your audience. Don't hate the journalist writing that though, you're better than that!
So... they're exactly the same as the non-Jews in media. Seems like the relevant variable here is quite obvious, and that you are focusing on the wrong one.
Not that idiotic, considering what has happened to them in nearly every country. If you are this outraged over Jews writing piffle, how much more outraged would you be if Jews had committed all sorts of atrocities against your group which resulted in actual death, mayhem and genocide?
Don't kid yourself. Blacks regularly stab Jews with no consequence at all. The race-hustler activists such as Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson can incite hatred and even violence against the Jews without any consequence.
They only care about anti-Semitism when they can tar an anti-establishment movement with that label.
Hate the "journalists" all you want. All I said was to not hate people who have nothing to do with those scumbag journalists, and who are as much enemies of those journalists as we are. The elites are enemies of us all.
I've honestly came across maybe a handful of Jews in politics that aren't stereotypical. I always frame it as a political Jewish issue, and not a general one, as I don't know all Jews. While I believe in stereotypes, I take each case as it comes, yet nearly every time they tick all the stereotypical boxes. Explain that to me? Tell me how it's a generalization, when it's the opposite? The issue with political Jews cannot be compared to the issues of the white male, or the white race, as we're far from being the stereotype that they push.
On top of that, as I mentioned on Reddit, every time I come across the worst examples of leftist extremism, it's nearly always a political Jew. They are some of the worst people on the left for pushing the left further and further down the well of madness. They are the main instigators of leftist extremism, if you can't accept that basic truth, you likely hold a bias that cannot be overridden.
Explain what? That Jews in politics happen to fit some stereotypes that you did not specify?
Special pleading.
Actually, most of the race baiting bullshit is from white women, but go off.
"White"
On second thought "women" is also appropriate given the sheer amount of trannies racebaiting too
Yes, white. As in, not Jewish. As in your so-called allies.
Man, Stormfags are nothing if not predictable. It can't be their pure Eva Brauns who are hating on white people, it must be Jeeeeeeeeewish women.
You've got a right to be biased against whatever stormfags are, but I hope you're not intending to turn away an ally because of their biases. If you think they're turning away allies over their own bias, I guess it'd be fair, but I haven't noticed them do so.
If you're a member of a given group and you see people accusing you of being evil incarnate because some members of your group who have nothing to do with you are engaged in some nasty stuff, that is not exactly encouragement to side with the good guys.
That's fair. I'm not gonna try to defend people I'm not on personal terms with, and it'd be ridiculous to try to impose my standards of communication on either side of a conflict.
Personally, I can get real loose with my expressions around my irl friends. And I know how it sounds if a bystander overhears. My excuse is that it's one part lazy group labeling and another part emotional release.
I dunno - I don't expect us all to be buddies here, but I hope to see us all work towards similar goals with very little infighting. Maybe that's naive of me.
As far as general optics go, I think we've been improving here with some minor fluctuations. We have an odd bunch, so anyone doing their part to lurk before posting should understand what we're really about...but I have been surprised at the occasional "normie" stumbling in here. So I can understand some concern there.
That sort of thing does not concern me. Being free is a good thing, not a bad thing. That said, it is also much different from having a deep ideological commitment to a point of view that vilifies a particular group of people. Make no mistake that any place that allows free speech attracts a good contingent of people who have an obsession with this particular ethnic group, and frankly, they ruin any forum with their nonsense.
Then we have to focus on what unites us, which is that SJWs are bad, not something else. In fact, I'd argue that it's a distraction. If people's focus is on the Jews, then they're missing a lot of what happens.
Some people have told me that I need to learn what this place is, or accused me of being a Chinese bot. So at the very least, we are attracting some people not from Reddit.
That sounded oddly like something I'd say.
The difference is that I don't believe this is in any way representative of women as a whole. It's only pointing out that it's not just Jewish women who do this, as Stormfags like to claim. Scapegoating women for the actions of men and women is as bad as scapegoating Jews for the actions of Jews and non-Jews.
Quite apart from being wrong, it's also foolish strategically. We need the support of Jews and non-Jews, men and women, to be able to defeat this menace, and that's not going to happen if you hate on them for no reason.
They're not even following their own advice - they should have thrown a few "Nazis" in there too!
Not even 'sure', that gives them room to just keep going on about it even more. Just 'whatever' and immediately go back to hammering them on whatever terrible shit they did that they're trying to distract from by flinging accusations at you.
They throw a grenade hoping everyone immediately refocuses on it and forgets about their wrongdoings, the blast damage against people they don't like is just an added bonus.
Jewish nepotism at it’s finest
angry merchant
I'd like to think that's just a troll or even an epic false flag, but what this PetuniaProudlock is saying is largely indistinguishable from the words of a number of contemporary RL Jews who seem awfully determined to make all the goyim gradually hate them & their people, so...
Should be archived, printed, and plastered over lamp posts.
Yo sonny, what website you using to see removed comments? The one I was using stopped working some time ago.
It's obviously a /pol/ fake, and I pity the people who are so deep down the rabbit-hole of their own making that they cannot see it.
Furthermore, this user appears to be a troll. I found an archived version of his old posts, where he does not appear to be a SJW at all, quite the contrary. Although he did simultaneously claim to be 19 years old as well as a 'cop'. https://archive.is/hfjiT
All the people she was arguing with were real accounts all of which got suspended and people have said that they can find the comments on removeddit. I will see if its true or not if not i'll delete
What counts as a "real account"? And how exactly have you verified that they are "real accounts"? I did try to find the accounts for TheDownvoteParade as well, he is suspended, and I could find no archive of his comments.
Which ones? The second group of comments I did manage to find, as it was linked in the first. The screenshot is accurate to that extent. However, the quoted comments (which frankly, sound most suspicious of all) are not linked, nor have I been able to find them or the threads in question. If they ever existed, they were likely deleted by the /r/Judaism moderators. I assume they did exist, because if someone in that conversation managed to point out that these comments cannot be found, this would have served less well as propaganda.
The point is not that the comments are fake, but that the individual is not what he claims he is. Most likely, he is a Stormfag-type who is posting this sort of thing to try to "prove" his pre-existing ideas about Jews. It's so ridiculously over-the-top. It's not the kind of thing that a Jew who believed this sort of thing would write, it's quite obvious to me that it's someone pretending to be.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/cc5wcg/grayson_allen_gets_ejected_for_being_a_dumbass/etm8fqa/?context=8&depth=9
Took a while but i found it
How did it take you 'a while' when it is literally linked in the comment? As I said:
Ok . That one is something im having issue finding. Since it can't be 100% proven i'll delete.
Appreciate it. I hate for us to become like the SJWs who just believe anything if it fits their narrative.
Note that I think it's likely that these comments were posted at some point, for the reasons specified above. However, I think it's exceedingly unlikely that this individual was what he claimed he was, rather than engaging in what is called 'black propaganda'.
It doesn't mean the user is real.
No actual Jews refer to the fucking Goyim meme.
no? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_Mgrr1Nkx0&ab_channel=TEHILA-TheKosherDiva
Uhuh, some weirdo singing that shitty feminist anthem isn't really proof of shit.
Shut up fed