The Guardian: AI is sexist because AOC in a bikini
(archive.is)
Comments (27)
sorted by:
Jesus christ you’d think this mexican was the first bitch with tits on the planet based on how people WILL NOT SHUT UP ABOUT HER
Your comment got me thinking. What if her nudes leak and it turns out she has sad tits? Dark nipples, huge areolas, saggy with stretch marks. She would lose almost all of her political and cultural capital because thirsty leftist simps would be disappointed in her tits. That's a real thing that would happen.
The opposite also holds true. If her tits turn out to be magic - inexplicably perky with tiny pink nipples - her political and cultural capital would expand massively overnight. She would probably become a legitimate candidate for president. That's the world we're living in now.
She would lose a surprising amount of support if she started regularly including a male in her social media posts.
There's no way she has pink nipples.
Implying she ever had tits.
No tits. Fake just like xirself.
Its simple misdirection. Get morons babbling about the commie in a cunt sling and flood news feeds and algorithms of her with that to distract from her flat out lying she in the capitol building when really she was in another one that was not even "attacked".
Feminists are very good at this kind of thing. Some of their "greatest achievements" have come by forcing something through while attention is elsewhere.
Does this bitch not understand its' because of the fact that women oversexualize themselves? Does this idiot not understand how much it's gone into overdrive the past few years because of shit like OnlyFans?
The algorithm is using what it has available to it. This idiot should tell other women to stop oversexualizing and selling themselves if she's offended by a stupid piece of software.
I feel like people are never going to work this shit out, so I'm going to make a post explaining it, as it keeps showing up.
Women are okay with OnlyFans etc because it's on their terms and actively dehumanizes men in the process. The idea of OnlyFans and the likes of it is to take everything they like about marriage and combine it with their dehumanization campaign.
Basically, after 20+ years of trying to break us into worshipping them, they tried their luck at doing what they always dreamed of. Putting in the minimum effort possible to milk money from a stable of cucks who have been groomed since childhood to worship women.
Coming back to this - the reason they bring up sexualization is because they are offended at the thought of men thinking about them in that way who haven't paid the tithe.
This is the same reason they get mad at virtual girls and porn sites. You haven't paid your offering to them, you aren't allowed to have those kind of thoughts. This is why the radical feminist in charge of Mastercard put Pornhub etc on the blacklist.
They aren't hypocrites, we just don't attribute the motivations correctly.
This is true, but especially with women. People have blinders on because "My mom/sister/wife wouldn't do that."
They’ve been merciful and not included the actual image.
Pass the brain bleach.
Is anything not sexist?
Seems like the only way they'd be happy is if we all were marched into gas chambers.
"Everything is sexist" - Anita Sarkesian.
As to your second point, no, that would not be enough. There's been plenty of articles bemoaning the lowered income and job opportunities of men... because that makes it harder for women to get an easy life and marry up. Do not forget: Women have always been the primary victims of war: They have to live when those lucky bastard men all die horrific deaths. As we know, when someone dies, they can come back to life whenever they want, but if someone's alive, they can never die, so it's clear the victim is the one who cannot choose, and MUST be alive.
At least they're honest.
I don't know how they aren't more widely hated. Are people really ruled by their base instincts this much?
?
Surely you don't think religion is the answer to this.
The women who had to work together on that private island beg to differ. Women will never be happy. Men should stop placating to their neuroticism, and embrace their natural instincts to lead as men.
Anything they say is complete lies.
We shouldn't attempt to lead them, we should just make sure they can't lead us. Limit the power their hatred holds and the rest falls into place.
Anita wasn't a crazy outlier when she said this
<looks at cup of team I'm drinking>
Hm, give them time, they'll reee up something about why it is.
Does that Horse-faced bartender have beer-flavored nipples or something? She does very little for me and candidly looks like she needs to be flea dipped most days. Adding to that, Occassio-Smollett does herself ZERO favors when she speaks.
Don't tell the AI ethicists. They'll lobotomize AI even more than they already are.
Remember when Amazon's AI refused to let women be hired?