I'm of the opinion that false accusations should result in execution, but I could be argued down to them requiring a week in the stockades or some equally strong social shaming that would make women too embarrassed to even consider attempting to pull that shit.
I chose "public urination" specifically because there are jurisdictions where such an act will get you put onto a public offender list, and forced to identify yourself to neighbors as being on said criminal list, for a long, LONG time. Just forced to ID as a known liar about these things to all neighbors and coworkers, a law to make the media disclose this fact whenever the person appears in the public eye ("Jynyt, known for lying about being sexually assaulted in the past, has now claimed..."), and it being kept in police and court records to watch for any repeat incidents, should be sufficient to keep the peace. I don't see why stackades or firing squads would be needed.
Mostly because they trigger lower level lizard brain aversion to the behavior we're trying to discourage. Your approach might be more effective in the long run however.
I'm of the opinion that false accusations should result in execution, but I could be argued down to them requiring a week in the stockades or some equally strong social shaming that would make women too embarrassed to even consider attempting to pull that shit.
I chose "public urination" specifically because there are jurisdictions where such an act will get you put onto a public offender list, and forced to identify yourself to neighbors as being on said criminal list, for a long, LONG time. Just forced to ID as a known liar about these things to all neighbors and coworkers, a law to make the media disclose this fact whenever the person appears in the public eye ("Jynyt, known for lying about being sexually assaulted in the past, has now claimed..."), and it being kept in police and court records to watch for any repeat incidents, should be sufficient to keep the peace. I don't see why stackades or firing squads would be needed.
Mostly because they trigger lower level lizard brain aversion to the behavior we're trying to discourage. Your approach might be more effective in the long run however.
This is why I don't respect you.
Hmm let's see...
The current state of being actively rewarded vs facing a criminal penalty. Which will drive more behavior?
And no, you can't use blacks as a counter-example, as they're actively rewarded to be criminals