For this reason, it is imperative that anything that they want is resisted, even if you consider it inconsequential, or even just. Getting those things, they will just move on to ever more insane things.
For example, I supported same-sex marriage, but it turns out that this was just preventing the pronouns left from lessening the punishment for intentionally spreading AIDS, having pedophile 'drag queens' spread propaganda to children, pretending that sex is a social construct, etc.
If it were about legal benefits, people would have been happy with civil unions. They weren't. It's about the stamp of approval of society.
Ideally, folks like Dave Rubin would be treated like the decent people that they are, while mad dogs like Philip would be treated like what they are - instead of like they are now, allowed to expose themselves to women in the locker rooms and showers.
If it were about legal benefits, people would have been happy with civil unions.
Civil unions have never granted all the same legal benefits of marriage, and there was nothing to say that once they did, they would continue to do so.
For this reason, it is imperative that anything that they want is resisted, even if you consider it inconsequential, or even just. Getting those things, they will just move on to ever more insane things.
For example, I supported same-sex marriage, but it turns out that this was just preventing the pronouns left from lessening the punishment for intentionally spreading AIDS, having pedophile 'drag queens' spread propaganda to children, pretending that sex is a social construct, etc.
Resist everything, and rollback what you can.
If it were about legal benefits, people would have been happy with civil unions. They weren't. It's about the stamp of approval of society.
Ideally, folks like Dave Rubin would be treated like the decent people that they are, while mad dogs like Philip would be treated like what they are - instead of like they are now, allowed to expose themselves to women in the locker rooms and showers.
Therein lies the problem. Communism and libertarianism exist in the same poisonous swamp.
Civil unions have never granted all the same legal benefits of marriage, and there was nothing to say that once they did, they would continue to do so.
Revanchism is the way forward.
Conservatism is simply concession.