You can't conflate anything social media related with the First Amendment if it's going to participate in the biggest act of censorship in history. You can't give them the excuse "they're a private company, they can do what they please with their platform" and then protect them with the same complaint people have been throwing at them in the first place.
Only since recent subversive indoctrination. The male/female paradigm has been proven highly successful. Not as robust as one might hope, but still incredibly viable.
that was just the easily observable effect. the real subversion was making dual income households normal, decimating the middle class, increasing household anxiety, and providing an ideology that rejected completely this paradigm that was forced into failure through institutional indoctrination.
You think men ever thought most women ever arose above infantile? Look at history a little, man. Tiktok is a realization of expectation, not a surprise outcome.
They're a private corporation, they can do whatever they please with their platform, including enforce government policies. The first amendment doesn't apply to them because they're not government.
/s
I look forwards to private security and law enforcement as government contractors using the same argument.
This fucker believes censorship is protected by the 1st Amendment? Don't you have to, I don't know, KNOW THE CONSTITUTION to be in the Government? That's not how it fucking works, dipshit. Jump into a volcano.
You can't conflate anything social media related with the First Amendment if it's going to participate in the biggest act of censorship in history. You can't give them the excuse "they're a private company, they can do what they please with their platform" and then protect them with the same complaint people have been throwing at them in the first place.
You can't conflate gay unions with marriage, either, but they did it anyway (and changed the law through language perversion).
Based and tradpilled.
Only since recent subversive indoctrination. The male/female paradigm has been proven highly successful. Not as robust as one might hope, but still incredibly viable.
that was just the easily observable effect. the real subversion was making dual income households normal, decimating the middle class, increasing household anxiety, and providing an ideology that rejected completely this paradigm that was forced into failure through institutional indoctrination.
You think men ever thought most women ever arose above infantile? Look at history a little, man. Tiktok is a realization of expectation, not a surprise outcome.
They're a private corporation, they can do whatever they please with their platform, including enforce government policies. The first amendment doesn't apply to them because they're not government.
/s
I look forwards to private security and law enforcement as government contractors using the same argument.
who needs a tyrannical government when we can be ruled by tyrannical megacorporations instead?
But isn’t that what you do with gun companies Sen. Hirono? And this isn’t that an attack in the 2nd amendment?
that thing you don't even believe in?
So let me get this straight:
This fucker believes censorship is protected by the 1st Amendment? Don't you have to, I don't know, KNOW THE CONSTITUTION to be in the Government? That's not how it fucking works, dipshit. Jump into a volcano.