that was just the easily observable effect. the real subversion was making dual income households normal, decimating the middle class, increasing household anxiety, and providing an ideology that rejected completely this paradigm that was forced into failure through institutional indoctrination.
You think men ever thought most women ever arose above infantile? Look at history a little, man. Tiktok is a realization of expectation, not a surprise outcome.
Who mentioned TikTok? CCP trash social media has no bearing on this conversation. This started before even the likes of MySpace.
The humanity women treat us with tracks exactly to their reliance on our support.
That's why things escalated so quickly. They were getting to a point where they could pretty much guarantee their "share" of our work.
2016 was when the script didn't go to plan. Most of the "populists" elected from that point were useless sycophants like Boris Johnson, but some actually stood strong, like Trump himself or his Brazilian counterpart, Jair Bolsonaro.
Where do the elite fit in and the CCP, you may ask.
The CCP wants a female supremacy movement to succeed because they know those countries are weaker, with men who are either unable or unwilling ("You expect me to fight for your country? After how you treat us?") to fight.
The elite will accept it, because women are massive consumers who buy tons of useless junk. They will get what they want in the end, a woman dominated society will be still full of purchases making them rich.
The point about tiktok was only in relation to the capacity of women. Trash media, CCP or otherwise, has absolute bearing, because such an outcome was inevitable afters womens liberation. (most) Women are an army of mental children, just waiting to be mobilized. We used to mobilize them for child rearing and homekeeping, but they've been coopted and used for nefarious purpose. It's not much different than raising a child without boundaries. They will often test their boundaries until they settle into worthlessness.
that was just the easily observable effect. the real subversion was making dual income households normal, decimating the middle class, increasing household anxiety, and providing an ideology that rejected completely this paradigm that was forced into failure through institutional indoctrination.
You're making so many excuses for something that's so easy and obvious to explain.
They only pretended to consider us human for as long as they needed our support. The moment they didn't, their true colors shone through.
You think men ever thought most women ever arose above infantile? Look at history a little, man. Tiktok is a realization of expectation, not a surprise outcome.
Who mentioned TikTok? CCP trash social media has no bearing on this conversation. This started before even the likes of MySpace.
The humanity women treat us with tracks exactly to their reliance on our support.
That's why things escalated so quickly. They were getting to a point where they could pretty much guarantee their "share" of our work.
2016 was when the script didn't go to plan. Most of the "populists" elected from that point were useless sycophants like Boris Johnson, but some actually stood strong, like Trump himself or his Brazilian counterpart, Jair Bolsonaro.
Where do the elite fit in and the CCP, you may ask.
The CCP wants a female supremacy movement to succeed because they know those countries are weaker, with men who are either unable or unwilling ("You expect me to fight for your country? After how you treat us?") to fight.
The elite will accept it, because women are massive consumers who buy tons of useless junk. They will get what they want in the end, a woman dominated society will be still full of purchases making them rich.
The point about tiktok was only in relation to the capacity of women. Trash media, CCP or otherwise, has absolute bearing, because such an outcome was inevitable afters womens liberation. (most) Women are an army of mental children, just waiting to be mobilized. We used to mobilize them for child rearing and homekeeping, but they've been coopted and used for nefarious purpose. It's not much different than raising a child without boundaries. They will often test their boundaries until they settle into worthlessness.