The greatest successful conspiracy was to make the word synonymous with crazy, schizo and wrong so that anyone talking about one can be dismissed instantly.
It is an incredibly useful tool as far as prosecution goes. Any connection between them all should be investigated thoroughly simply for that one purpose.
Yea, I don't think they actively conspired on a massive scale. They're just all on the same page because of years of fake news and echo chambers.
They know what "needs to be done" because orange man bad and right side of history and whatnot. You just have to look at social media where they actively celebrate the shady shit that comes to light. The ends justify any means to them.
Which is why proving anything in court is going to be really hard. You don't have one big network. You have thousands of independent participants. If one of them gets caught the organization as a whole is isolated from any fallout.
They're like a terrorist organization with a fanatic ideology and cells who act on their own.
They eventually do if that person causes enough Leftists to clutch pearls. They almost turned on Narwhal when the Russia Times thing happened.
They don't reject suspicious Leftists without them shitting on them first (How many AGGers did Hat and others cozy up to on Twitter?), but any of the non-Leftists ecelebs they are constantly on the prowl for. They were itching for excuses to ban OAG for months (not that it wasn't low tier garbage), same with Milo once he stopped giving them attention.
Narwhal has at least some sense in that noggin. Enough to tell them to stop worshiping every word out of their mouth. There will come a day when they turn on those simps in KIA, because they are a dead market.
I can't see how anyone would willingly stay there if they knew this place existed as an alternative
We say mean words, allow bad thinkers like Misogynists and Nazis speak rather than hard censor them, and don't give Leftists/Gays/Whoever the basic "superior" position they hold in every other forum.
That place is perfect for the lazy "watchdog" Leftists who pretend they are doing something by sitting around and still rush to defend their precious Leftwing from the evil right trying to hoist them with their own petard.
First of all, I don't find 'networks of poll workers, local and state officials - in several states' to be all that implausible.
Second, I don't think anything that coordinated or grand is required.
All you need is a few people making fake mail in ballots and sending them to be counted by people who don't have a reasonable, timely way to determine the legitimacy of every ballot.
And this is before we even touch the idea that the billionaires behind Dominion might just get some guy to put a line of code that flips every nth vote to Democrat.
People who aren't conspiring to steal an election have no problem with people from the other party being there to make sure there's no funny business.
Considering all of the cities that all the issues are happening in have decades long histories of election fraud by the Democrat party in local elections, is it really that hard to believe that the existing fraud infrastructure could be mustered for a national election?
It's not necessarily conspiracy. I've known people who are so maligned and amoral that they'd cheat on a small scale without telling anyone. In fact, volunteer positions to count votes would naturally attract these type of people, and so a network isn't necessary, just a smattering of individuals who like to abuse any authority they can get their hands on taking on any amount of responsibility on a local scale, done nationwide by hundreds or thousands. Then as it gets higher in scale we see the media oligarchs sway the narrative to discredit it happening at this large scale. Remember the slight narrative shift of "fraud doesn't happen" to "WIDESPREAD fraud doesn't happen"?
That's a curious take. It's not about ignoring fraud completely until some magic number is passed, at which point it becomes important (besides which, how would one establish such a number? Politely ask the Biden campaign to detail the ballots they've submitted fraudulently?).
It's about finding an irregularity and addressing it, and doing so until you can demonstrate that the polls are representative of the demos. At the moment, it seems as if the more people look, the more problems they find.
Also Tucker said the woman at that press conference, Sidney Powell, refused to provide any evidence of her claims and actually asked them to stop calling her.
Also Tucker said the woman at that press conference, Sidney Powell, refused to provide any evidence of her claims and actually asked them to stop calling her.
He works in the same building as Sean Hannity. He should be used to the tick-tock bullshit. At least Sidney has delivered previously.
Just going to repost a comment I put in another thread because it's just as relevant, if not more, here:
This is why this kind of stuff doesn't need a 'huge conspiracy'. Individuals will towards a shared goal without interaction.
This is exactly what I was trying to explain to some people the other day.
There doesn't have to be any big conspiracy to cheat among the democrats for it to have happened.
The democrats and media have created an environment where cheating is easy, and in some people's minds "justified" (to stop literally Hitler). And the elections officials/ballot counters in the deep blue cities in swing states are all ardent democrats.
So if the counters are all democrats, their supervisors are democrats, they're motivated to cheat, and the system has been set up to make cheating extremely easy to do and get away with ... what do you think is going to happen?
Nobody had to make an overarching plan or give the order.
If every other counter was biased just a little bit (disqualify trump ballots, approve rule breaking democrat ballots), and their supervisor turned a neglectful or blind eye, that alone could swing an election. And that's not even getting into the number of counters who are willing to outright cheat.
It's bottom up election fraud. No conspiracy needed.
Bonus benefit:
If a couple ballot counters do get caught it's easy to swing that as an "isolated incident" that couldn't swing the election.
Nobody told them to cheat after all.
I love the idea that it has to be one big overarching conspiracy, and it can't just be a bunch of individual useful idiots adding up.
The greatest successful conspiracy was to make the word synonymous with crazy, schizo and wrong so that anyone talking about one can be dismissed instantly.
Maybe. Tying RICO to this is not a bad idea.
It is an incredibly useful tool as far as prosecution goes. Any connection between them all should be investigated thoroughly simply for that one purpose.
It's the whole premise of the ideology regardless of access to the power positions. Weed out the Wrong Thinkers.
Yea, I don't think they actively conspired on a massive scale. They're just all on the same page because of years of fake news and echo chambers.
They know what "needs to be done" because orange man bad and right side of history and whatnot. You just have to look at social media where they actively celebrate the shady shit that comes to light. The ends justify any means to them.
Which is why proving anything in court is going to be really hard. You don't have one big network. You have thousands of independent participants. If one of them gets caught the organization as a whole is isolated from any fallout.
They're like a terrorist organization with a fanatic ideology and cells who act on their own.
I'm still waiting to see what the limit is for Sophia Narwhal before KIA1 turns on that one like it does every eceleb it ever adopts.
So far, like any good leftist group, the tranny gets full protection from all criticism and maximum worship.
They eventually do if that person causes enough Leftists to clutch pearls. They almost turned on Narwhal when the Russia Times thing happened.
They don't reject suspicious Leftists without them shitting on them first (How many AGGers did Hat and others cozy up to on Twitter?), but any of the non-Leftists ecelebs they are constantly on the prowl for. They were itching for excuses to ban OAG for months (not that it wasn't low tier garbage), same with Milo once he stopped giving them attention.
Narwhal has at least some sense in that noggin. Enough to tell them to stop worshiping every word out of their mouth. There will come a day when they turn on those simps in KIA, because they are a dead market.
We say mean words, allow bad thinkers like Misogynists and Nazis speak rather than hard censor them, and don't give Leftists/Gays/Whoever the basic "superior" position they hold in every other forum.
That place is perfect for the lazy "watchdog" Leftists who pretend they are doing something by sitting around and still rush to defend their precious Leftwing from the evil right trying to hoist them with their own petard.
First of all, I don't find 'networks of poll workers, local and state officials - in several states' to be all that implausible. Second, I don't think anything that coordinated or grand is required.
All you need is a few people making fake mail in ballots and sending them to be counted by people who don't have a reasonable, timely way to determine the legitimacy of every ballot.
And this is before we even touch the idea that the billionaires behind Dominion might just get some guy to put a line of code that flips every nth vote to Democrat.
all the fraud happened exclusively in cities. its not too difficult to coordinate on a local level.
Sisterhood Uber Alles.
Joe Biden - "We will create a task force to combat online misogyny"
She's a registered democrat and always has been. I doubt its 'sisterhood' but rather not wanting to swallow a bitter, black pill.
People who aren't conspiring to steal an election have no problem with people from the other party being there to make sure there's no funny business.
Considering all of the cities that all the issues are happening in have decades long histories of election fraud by the Democrat party in local elections, is it really that hard to believe that the existing fraud infrastructure could be mustered for a national election?
It's not necessarily conspiracy. I've known people who are so maligned and amoral that they'd cheat on a small scale without telling anyone. In fact, volunteer positions to count votes would naturally attract these type of people, and so a network isn't necessary, just a smattering of individuals who like to abuse any authority they can get their hands on taking on any amount of responsibility on a local scale, done nationwide by hundreds or thousands. Then as it gets higher in scale we see the media oligarchs sway the narrative to discredit it happening at this large scale. Remember the slight narrative shift of "fraud doesn't happen" to "WIDESPREAD fraud doesn't happen"?
Never trust a feminist.
Especially one with a small hat
That's a curious take. It's not about ignoring fraud completely until some magic number is passed, at which point it becomes important (besides which, how would one establish such a number? Politely ask the Biden campaign to detail the ballots they've submitted fraudulently?).
It's about finding an irregularity and addressing it, and doing so until you can demonstrate that the polls are representative of the demos. At the moment, it seems as if the more people look, the more problems they find.
FALSE QUOTE.
Also Tucker said the woman at that press conference, Sidney Powell, refused to provide any evidence of her claims and actually asked them to stop calling her.
This. Her take is cowardly and embarrassing, but don't put quotes around something she never said. That's just misleading.
He works in the same building as Sean Hannity. He should be used to the tick-tock bullshit. At least Sidney has delivered previously.
Just going to repost a comment I put in another thread because it's just as relevant, if not more, here:
This is exactly what I was trying to explain to some people the other day.
There doesn't have to be any big conspiracy to cheat among the democrats for it to have happened.
The democrats and media have created an environment where cheating is easy, and in some people's minds "justified" (to stop literally Hitler). And the elections officials/ballot counters in the deep blue cities in swing states are all ardent democrats.
So if the counters are all democrats, their supervisors are democrats, they're motivated to cheat, and the system has been set up to make cheating extremely easy to do and get away with ... what do you think is going to happen?
Nobody had to make an overarching plan or give the order.
If every other counter was biased just a little bit (disqualify trump ballots, approve rule breaking democrat ballots), and their supervisor turned a neglectful or blind eye, that alone could swing an election. And that's not even getting into the number of counters who are willing to outright cheat.
It's bottom up election fraud. No conspiracy needed.
Bonus benefit:
If a couple ballot counters do get caught it's easy to swing that as an "isolated incident" that couldn't swing the election.
Nobody told them to cheat after all.
When you catch someone in a crime, that is not a "lack of faith"
And the election sytem has 10 layers of checks and balances and a fuck ton of laws,
specifically because you can't just have 'faith' that it will work out.
That might be true for the most part,, But most of the crap comes from a relative handful of known corrupt precincts
I completely agree with her