Because lockdowns are harmful to life. Barely anyone dies from covid. And when motorcycle deaths are listed as covid deaths, the numbers you throw around are clearly fake.
Suicide rates are increasing though, and people dying of other preventable illnesses are increasing. Lockdowns are a waste of time and only serve to harm us more.
Because babies have a lot more life left in them than 80 year olds.
Counter argument : How can you be pro-lockdown and pro-choice? If life is so worthless when it's an inconvenience to a woman, why do we have to shut everything down? Do I have to get a woman to say lockdowns are bad to get everything opened?
Do I have to get a woman to say lockdowns are bad to get everything opened?
Unironically yes.
You would already understand this if you took a five minute break from your blind hatred long enough to process how human psychology works in regards to gender.
The commies are trying to match their cumulative world record for death by artificial famine with a single man made disaster.
In April, Beasley said 135 million people faced “crisis levels of hunger or worse.” A WFP analysis then showed that COVID=19 could push an additional 130 million people “to the brink of starvation by the end of 2020.”
Does it not say a lot that these professional liars admittedly fail to understand 50-80% of the country that they purport to report on - and fervently despise?
You don't want to see babies killed because of an increase in "birth control" abortions.
anti-lockdown
You don't want to see babies killed because of an increase in domestic abuse caused by simultaneous social isolation and job loss.
There ya go. Enjoy attempting to discern the complexity of that kind of mind. Presuming one motivation that you don't have is going to be hard for you, I know, but maybe just try for once in your life. And if you succeed I'll try a multimotivation concept on you! Like people can think about different things differently or something!
I don't understand how you can be pro abortion, but against eugenics. Heck I'm not even here to preach the benefits of eugenics, just let the weak die off, like all of those people who can't feed themselves no matter how much education, money, and aid you throw their way. We've pissed $5 trillion on Africa so far, and all we've gotten out of it is 1.5 billion mouths to feed instead of 250 million. America isn't much better. Why can women abort babies that have already been born, but I can't say "screw giving more aid to people who only become a bigger burden, and are completely ungrateful to boot, not to mention detrimental to society".
The lockdown would be akin to forcefully keeping pregnant women indoors in controled alchool-free facilities "just to mak'e sure" they cannot accidentally harm the baby.
Zealously pro-lockdown people might want to up this incarceration to all women of fertile age that aren't on birth control ( to make a "mandatory vaccine status checks" comparaison ).
Yet again an example of the Right understanding but disagreeing with the Left's viewpoint, and the Left pathologically unable to understand the Right's PoV.
The way I see it, a more comparable idea to abortion would be to go around and kill any person who might give you Covid so there's no chance they can spread it to you. After all, it might be inconvenient to have to go to the doctor or to have to recover, and there's a slight chance it might kill you.
Because lockdowns are harmful to life. Barely anyone dies from covid. And when motorcycle deaths are listed as covid deaths, the numbers you throw around are clearly fake. Suicide rates are increasing though, and people dying of other preventable illnesses are increasing. Lockdowns are a waste of time and only serve to harm us more.
And that's not even mentioning the destruction being wrought on independant businesses and the profits going to globalists
Because babies have a lot more life left in them than 80 year olds.
Counter argument : How can you be pro-lockdown and pro-choice? If life is so worthless when it's an inconvenience to a woman, why do we have to shut everything down? Do I have to get a woman to say lockdowns are bad to get everything opened?
We've had enough saying they're good, it'd be a pleasant change.
Unironically yes.
You would already understand this if you took a five minute break from your blind hatred long enough to process how human psychology works in regards to gender.
The commies are trying to match their cumulative world record for death by artificial famine with a single man made disaster.
-AP interview with director of World Food Program
Does it not say a lot that these professional liars admittedly fail to understand 50-80% of the country that they purport to report on - and fervently despise?
This is the same Globalist Fake News who old us HUNDREDS were at Trump rally.
I thought that was the CBC.
All Canadian MSM is the same.
Especially after the $500M bailout
You don't want to see babies killed because of an increase in "birth control" abortions.
You don't want to see babies killed because of an increase in domestic abuse caused by simultaneous social isolation and job loss.
There ya go. Enjoy attempting to discern the complexity of that kind of mind. Presuming one motivation that you don't have is going to be hard for you, I know, but maybe just try for once in your life. And if you succeed I'll try a multimotivation concept on you! Like people can think about different things differently or something!
I don't understand how you can be pro abortion, but against eugenics. Heck I'm not even here to preach the benefits of eugenics, just let the weak die off, like all of those people who can't feed themselves no matter how much education, money, and aid you throw their way. We've pissed $5 trillion on Africa so far, and all we've gotten out of it is 1.5 billion mouths to feed instead of 250 million. America isn't much better. Why can women abort babies that have already been born, but I can't say "screw giving more aid to people who only become a bigger burden, and are completely ungrateful to boot, not to mention detrimental to society".
Can't tell if you mean women or BLM.
Why limit it to one, or both, or even those two?
In the same way Antifa is more than happy to act as the Democrat brownshirts, or how the Revolution is financed, backed and supported by the System.
Let's try to un-fuck their broken comparaison :
The lockdown would be akin to forcefully keeping pregnant women indoors in controled alchool-free facilities "just to mak'e sure" they cannot accidentally harm the baby.
Zealously pro-lockdown people might want to up this incarceration to all women of fertile age that aren't on birth control ( to make a "mandatory vaccine status checks" comparaison ).
Yet again an example of the Right understanding but disagreeing with the Left's viewpoint, and the Left pathologically unable to understand the Right's PoV.
The way I see it, a more comparable idea to abortion would be to go around and kill any person who might give you Covid so there's no chance they can spread it to you. After all, it might be inconvenient to have to go to the doctor or to have to recover, and there's a slight chance it might kill you.
I wonder how you can be pro-choice and vegan, but what do I know?