Okay, but are they wrong in comparing it to gore? Do you guys think gore videos should be legal to possess? Especially from murder victims. Let's say pictures of people who have been murdered, who are under 18. If you want to criminalise footage of one terrible crime against people under 18, then you want to criminalise ALL footage of similarly terrible crimes, no?
I don't like the idea of the government criminalising data. That's all there is to it.
I won't shed any tears for it though. What I'm saying is entirely a matter of principle, not preference.
It actually amazes me that they're so dishonest they're ACTUALLY trying to cover up that people are just misdiagnosing the flu. I genuinely thought it was obvious enough that it was an easy mistake, so I expected them to be like "shit happens, so sometimes people think the flu is actually covid", but no, they just straight up expect us to buy it, and they deny it???
All of the above are very based.