1
mharmless 1 point ago +1 / -0

I bounced off Book of the New Sun early in the first book, the cannibalism scene. It wasn't terribly pleasant before that either, but I did enjoy the way he described the ancient photo of the moon landing.

4
mharmless 4 points ago +7 / -3

But when you act differently you get treated differently, simple as.

The punishment isn't for an act, it's for a thought. The text is the act.

9
mharmless 9 points ago +10 / -1

Rule enforcement via mind reading is some reddit tier shit. Why even bother to have written rules when the actual rule is 'whatever a mod thinks feels right in the moment'?

Make the naughty list and you'll be dinged into months of bans over relatively innocuous shit like Imp gets.

The above comment is entirely for humorous purposes. mharmless INC does not promote, advocate, glorify, or endorse violence in any form, including self defense, warfare, or the putting down of lame animals. in fact, mharmless INC believes surgery should be banned because it involves solving problems with deadly weapons.

3
mharmless 3 points ago +3 / -0

Shit, whatever you do don't look south.

2
mharmless 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm afraid this post is a rule 2 violation, as it glorifies violence.

Very sad. Many such cases.

The above comment is entirely for humorous purposes. mharmless INC does not promote, advocate, glorify, or endorse violence in any form, including self-defense, warfare, or the putting down of lame animals.

3
mharmless 3 points ago +3 / -0

Seriously. I just keep chewing through kindle unlimited trash where the protagonist just gets ever bigger weapons to beat up ever bigger threats. Something satisfying about solving a problem with a bigger gun.

The above comment is entirely for humorous purposes. mharmless INC does not promote, advocate, glorify, or endorse violence in any form, including self-defense, warfare, or the putting down of lame animals.

4
mharmless 4 points ago +5 / -1

No FartFag. He was my mod. I'll do it.

The above comment is entirely for humorous purposes. mharmless INC does not promote, advocate, glorify, or endorse violence in any form, including self defense, warfare, or the putting down of lame animals

4
mharmless 4 points ago +5 / -1

Apparently you can't see them in my history. Oh well.

24
mharmless 24 points ago +26 / -2

View my comment history to see what sentences are verboten.

Rule 2 enforcement is capricious and arbitrary.

Most of these reddit tier rules need to go, frankly.

2
mharmless 2 points ago +2 / -0

The context being that you know I support rule 2 solutions and therefore you can decide that any arbitrary thing I say is a violation despite the fact that I explicitly avoid breaking the rule as written. If my exact post had been made by somebody else, there would have been no ban.

This is an abuse of enforcement. Remove the strike, reinstate the post.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
mharmless 1 point ago +1 / -0

That magazine had at least six more rounds in it, and they can't punish you any harder than they already will.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
mharmless 1 point ago +1 / -0

Realistically, his fate was life in prison the moment he fired the first shot.

1
mharmless 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fine. Which sentence exactly do you have a problem with? Lets find out.

2
mharmless 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is ridiculous that the ban length keeps doubling.

1
mharmless 1 point ago +1 / -0

You said it, not me.

Read the verbs again. Promote, Advocate, Glorify, Endorse.

My post does none of that. Restore it, remove the strike.

0
mharmless 0 points ago +1 / -1

And I pointed out what a man with nothing to lose is. Not that it should be done.

Remove my strike.

1
mharmless 1 point ago +2 / -1

This appears to violate rule 2, as you are engaging in speech that promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence, in this case against civilian targets.

Just because some place is zoned residential, doesn't mean there's not genuine military targets in it.

Bad Dom. Bad. For shame.

1
mharmless 1 point ago +1 / -0

I did no such thing and anybody can look at my post history to confirm it for themselves to see exactly what I posted right before this post.

Words have meaning, Dom. I did not promote, advocate, glorify, or endorse a goddamned thing. Stop punishing me for your opinion on my private thoughts.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
27
mharmless 27 points ago +27 / -0

Reddit isn't going to see this. I got banned from r/technology after providing government sources in Washington state law showing exactly how children were able to be transed behind their parent's backs and where exactly the requirements on school districts came from.

The tranny jannies will ban anybody who posts this and then remove the post.

Edit: The tranny jannie here banned me for two days for pointing out that the panama shooter was getting life no matter how many people he shot.

7
mharmless 7 points ago +7 / -0

I will.

The nineteenth amendment and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›