1
logintoblockcommunit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ma'am, I appreciate the fact that your entire worldview and philosophical system is based around gaslighting people by spouting as much bullshit as possible and acting like all the objections to it are absurd, but surely you must have enough self-awareness, this deep into the disagreement, to realize that it isn't working?

Or are you so deep in the mire that it has permeated the very nature of your being, and you can no more stop lying then a scorpion can stop stinging the frog?

1
logintoblockcommunit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sir, do you understand the difference between SPERM and SEMEN?

Semen quality is just a measure of the volume and mobility of the sperm in it.

Yes, semen containing sperm with damaged DNA would result in either less volume of cells, less activity in the cells, or both. This would lower the quality of the semen.

1
logintoblockcommunit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nah, there's no onus on me to disprove your hypothesis. YOU make the claim of religion and the assorted bits (a god, a devil, afterlives, magic, etc.), and I'm denying it. The statement "there is nothing after you die" is the standard null hypothesis you test the claim "there is something after you die" against.

As always, the onus of proof rests on the godbotherers and jesus enjoyer, because you're the ones making a claim. And you've never been able to furnish any evidence. Instead, you just keep buying bridges, saying "surely this time it's legitimate. That robed man with the funny hat said 'trust me bro' and everything!"

1
logintoblockcommunit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Always stridently refuse to acknowledge the fact that you really want magic sky sempai to notice you, eh?

No, instead, let's try to move the goal posts over a bit, away from the motte and over to the bailey.

1
logintoblockcommunit 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm torn between calling you an NPC because all you can do is repeat preprogrammed lines for specific stimuli, and telling you you have no leg to stand on given your username, so I'll do both.

1
logintoblockcommunit 1 point ago +1 / -0

See, me dying won't prove shit to you, since your delusion is about your own mortality.

I know that all that awaits is nothing. You lie to yourself and to others about a jeaven and a hell.

So, if you please, we'd all be best served if you went and killed yourself.

I mean, if we're ever close by and you're willing to pay my fee, I'll speed you on your way, but given our...geographic constraints, shall we say, you're gonna have to be a self starter.

Or self ender, as the case may be.

1
logintoblockcommunit 1 point ago +1 / -0

You...want me to kill you to prove my point?

Isn't that sort of thing more your wheelhouse, godbotherer?

1
logintoblockcommunit 1 point ago +1 / -0

You'll see the darkness of death like everyone else does, and there will be no one and nothing waiting for you as you disappear forever. No one will remember you. No one will love you. Everyone you love will eventually die.

The sooner you people come to terms with this, the sooner we can move on as a species.

4
logintoblockcommunit 4 points ago +4 / -0

What biological processes exist to prevent us from choosing traits to pass on?

The only reason we can't is because reproduction is entirely chance based. Which sperm cell enters which prepared egg is absolutely random, and "choosing traits" is simply picking out precisely which pairs we want to form a zygote.

You know what, before that. How exactly do you think biology works? Do you understand how DNA is formed, how genes are expressed, how cells grow and reproduce? Because I'm not really getting the impression you are familiar with these processes, based on the statements you make.

1
logintoblockcommunit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right, because you care so much about the man, and not at all about the magic and attaching yourself to what you see as the biggest dick magic sky king.

Your boy jesus doesn't even exist in your mind, and you have the absolute temerity to insist he take root in mine.

Go spin a chicken in a bag to work off your sins, you idolator.

1
logintoblockcommunit 1 point ago +1 / -0

It always amuses me when the godbuggerers pretend the crux of their argumentation isn't "and then he did a magic".

Even if, IF, jesus was a real person (and that's a hell of a weird name for that region and that time), you people never want to discuss his humanity, only his divinity and his magic. You dont care for his morality or his ethics except as it overlaps with him being king biggus magical dickus and telling people what to do.

You're clout chasing sycophants, pretending at virtue.

7
logintoblockcommunit 7 points ago +7 / -0

We have a natural disgust of deformed creatures and monkeying around with natural processes for a reason.

The former premise is true only because we assume deformity = disease or genetic maladaptation, a judgement which was correct in most circumstances in the ancestral environment.

The latter premise is retarded. One of the earliest things humans did was selectively breed crops and animals for size, yield, and physical characteristics. We don't just not have an aversion, we have a predeliction for tampering with natural processes.

3
logintoblockcommunit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh, yeah, absolutely, CICO is king because you can't best thermodynamics.

I meant it more in the sense of "a slice of bread shouldn't be 15g of sugar and 250 kcal". Especially when you consider the fact that loads of people can't read a menu at McDonalds (I'm old enough to remember when their menus had text and not just pictures on them) and need a calculator to divide by two or ten, and we're expecting them to understand nutrition facts and ingredient lists.

Imagine thinking you're eating healthy because you had a turkey and processed cheese sandwich with some sliced veggies, and you don't realize your small sandwich was 550 kcal by itself, so you have another later because the lack of fat in the meal meant you got hungry again, and you've just blown through half your reccomended daily kcal intake and eaten 30-50 grams of sugar, depending on the type of bread used.

Its criminal.

8
logintoblockcommunit 8 points ago +8 / -0

To be fair, it's not 100% people's fault. Maybe 75%.

Remember that most modern food is almost literally poison; absolute slop filled with water, preservative chemicals, and organic byproducts. Couple that with people not being taught, either by parents or by schooling, how to cook and eat healthy AND the hidden trap in trying to teach yourself how to cook from old cookbooks that assume the ingredients being used aren't slop and poison, and you get a very nearly catch-22: eating what seems like normal amounts of simple food like bread and cheese gets you a sugar addiction, and unless you can grow your own food or live near enough to farms to buy raw ingredients, can't get decent food to cook with.

My grandma taught me how to cook, and bless her heart but she wanted to add 500 kcal of butter to each dish because of how she grew up and how her mother taught her. If I tried to cook her meals and eat them, I'd balloon out in a month since I don't work in the fields eight to twelve hours a day.

12
logintoblockcommunit 12 points ago +12 / -0

No, the "thermal clip" change was retarded.

Yes, more shooty is more good, but thermal clips should have been an ADDITION, not a REPLACEMENT, for internal heat sinks.

Its absolutely pants on head retarded to trade reliable, near infinite ammo weapons for weapons that need a reload every ten to thirty shots, and stop working if you run out of heat sinks.

Especially when you consider how you could mod guns to have a greater cooling rate then heating st full auto by the time you got to mark 5 modifications in the original. My Vanguard would basically walk into a room and fire his shotgun on full auto until everything was dead, and never got above half heat. Only time I ever had guns overheated was when I was using a sniper rifle I specifically built as a anti-material BFG, and that thing could two tap the big boy constructs.

3
logintoblockcommunit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nah, sorry, I'm tired of that argument. It never works, because the mudslimes just get back in.

I am now of the opinion that uppity muslims get nothing but a bullet that is dipped in pig blood before being fired. No, I don't care if the geneva suggestion classifies that as a "war crime" because it offends the desert goat fuckers sky fairy king; the pig blood is an explicit fuck you in their mythology.

Barbarians only understand strength. We must demonstrate that strength.

1
logintoblockcommunit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lots of other things.

I enjoy sculpting, for example.

4
logintoblockcommunit 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sure. Fuck the talmud. I hate judaism.

Happy?

1
logintoblockcommunit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Chance. The christian cult happened to win the duel of delusions and become the dominant cult.

If the mudslimes had won instead and we had before mudhammad / after mudhammad, you'd be asking why anyone should care about BC/AD.

You're confusing familiarity for objectivity.

1
logintoblockcommunit 1 point ago +1 / -0

The funny thing, the absolutely hilarious thing that the small minds entirely filled with their god can't grasp, is that we kept the numbering the same in CE/BCE out of laziness, and not out of some implicit rightness to your calendar.

It was seen as having been too much unneccessary work to rewrite all the dates in all the reference literature, since we had a good example from Japan with their whole Showa/Reiwa/etc era conversions to whatever CE period being an absolute pain in the ass.

But go on believing it's because everyone secretly loves keeping time by jesus.

3
logintoblockcommunit 3 points ago +3 / -0

He lives rent free in your head, eh?

I know this is pissing in the wind, since even here a mjlajority of people have no internal monologue and can't rotate the apple, but if you care to actually check instead of spouting stupid shit, you'll notice my account is decently old and has spent time actually arguing with that idiot.

Though I imagine you'll say some shit like that was some 5D chess where he pretended to argue with a sock puppet in order to maintain credibility, because ol' woman hater was notorious for his deep plans and multilayer schemes, and not just some raving schizo you could peg from a mile away.

3
logintoblockcommunit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sure. I've said before elsewhere that my antipathy for the jews, mudslimes, hindus, and etc. is just as deep as the one for your favorite bronze age book.

I mean, I'm not going to write some sort of unhinged manifesto, since that would take too long, but there's my stance on it.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›