REPE'AT, verb transitive [Latin repeto; re and peto, to make at or drive towards.]
If form within flow aka life moving from inception towards death, then what are the implications of "driving forwards"?
That implies a good bot; which would represent the conflict of reason (good vs bad aka true vs false); which means this represents a suggested belief (bad) in exchange for ignorance towards free will of choice; needed for constant evaluation to sustain balance (hence choice) as form within flow.
A -> B; E -> F.
What does " -> " represent? Motion aka flow aka implication (if/then). Take a finger and jab it gently in your face. What you will feel represents form within flow aka momentum within motion.
We perceive because flow communicates to form; we can act because form represents a response to flow, we have a choice of action (free will) because temporary momentum within ongoing motion implies balance, and balance within motion implies the need for choice of action for form within flow...adaptation.
the middle ground
A to Z equals beginning (inception) towards end (death); which makes the sustenance of life (form within flow) a choice based responsibility; a balance act; ONEs (form) middle ground of temporary opportunity (potential) within the ongoing ALL (flow) aka potentiality.
to fill in
Flow represents ALL (potentiality); form represents the segregation of collective potentially into individual ONE potential. ONE perceives ALL; has a choice (free will) to adhere or ignore ALL, and the result of that choice builds ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived aka ONEs potential within ALL offered potentiality.
Filling in represents adaption to inspiration (from ALL), which through free will of choice, will be transmuted into comprehended information (within ONE). Flow moves form; form perceives the movement of other form; which represents the inspiration communicated from flow to form.
We are dealing with a parasite (form) that suggests us to ignore adherence to flow by consenting through free will of choice to "believe" in the suggestion of other form. If we ignore to adapt to inspiration; while believing suggested information; then we self restrict the transmutation from inspiration (flow) into information (form) aka our potential aka our responsibility to sustain ONEself (form) within ALL (flow).
You are; so everything that was lead towards you to be. What if others suggest you to ignore the sustenance of that which is (you); for contemplation about that which was (not you)? In other words...suggestion as distraction to waste potential. Sounds like a beneficial racket for the few who want to control the many; doesn't it?
archeology
That which is represents the accumulation of that which was. What are the implications for that which will be; if ignoring that which is for that which was?
"quit being the teacher she was hired to be and became an advocate for her own personal views.
Follow the party-line; not being the party-line; comrade...
racism
A suggested -ism alleging the hatred of other races...what's the suggested -ism for loving ones own race? There's none. A rhetorical trick to cause conflict without allowing defense against miscegenation; which targets all so called races.
SOPH'IST, noun [Latin sophista.] - "a captious or fallacious reasoner".
Reason represents the conflict between truth vs false, and is based on consenting to a suggested belief. I neither consent to suggested information (I adapt to inspiration); nor do I consent to reason (I adhere to implication aka if/then).
faggots
FAG'OT, verb transitive - "to tie together; to bind in a bundle" aka the unity of form within flow...both real unity (self sustenance) and false unity (ignorance under false authority).
just so you know
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists". Each ONE perceives ALL; no ONE fully comprehends ALL, hence us representing ONE potential within ALL potentiality aka form within flow.
Plato
If you can read this...you're still sitting in the cave; still consenting to suggestion.
Comprehension (to conceive out of) is based upon perception; which requires communication between flow and form aka ongoing energy...there's no "off" state within energy.
IDE'A, noun [Latin idea; Gr. to see, Latin video.] aka that which is offered by flow to the perception of the form within. You are ONE within ALL; a potential transmuted out of a potentiality...others suggest you to consent to believe in nothing so that you ignore everything offered to you.
Furthermore; the agenda behind transhumanism is to exchange comprehension of 1 (natural reality) with 0 (suggested fiction).
nothing at all
ALL represents everything, and you represent ONE within ALL, so tell me; surrounded by everything...why did you choose to believe nothing exists?
fake intellectual
INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand). ONEs comprehension is based on free will of choice made upon ALL perceived. Your belief in "fake" within reality is what corrupts your comprehension, because you judge reality through the lens of believing in fake.
FAKE, noun - "one of the circles or windings of a cable or hawser, as it lies in a coil; a single turn". What does turning as form within flow imply? Resistance to flow aka self sustenance of form; a "single" form aka ONE within ALL. You are being deceived to believe in true vs false; when neither exist within change (flow). Your choice of ignorance.
What if we exist within collective coherence; while our individual comprehension represents the incoherence aspect needed for balance?
I didn't say that you used the semicolon incorrectly
Still no light in the world of semicolons for me...
I could follow your comment and agree with it until the semicolon
False authority; because offer of suggestion was made by free will by ONE, and consented to by the free will of another ONE. Those who consent are submitting to the free will of the other; while ignoring their own free will for it. Free will of choice represents ONEs sole authority over self within the balance of ALL (form within flow).
Party-line; because when ONE chooses to consent (by believing) the suggestions of another ONE, then the other gains the power to act in the name of the suggested belief. Upholding any beliefs represents idolatry (affixing form; while ignoring flow). Every ONE who consents to believe any suggestion finds himself in a chain of command under a false authority that acts in the name of an idol to define how all the others are acting when adhering to their beliefs.
Mainstream narrative; because those who offer suggestions (form) are narrating the main stream (flow) for those who believe them (form). Instead of adhering as form to flow; we are tricked to perceive reality through the lens of suggested fiction aka adhering as form to other form; while ignoring flow.
To believe represents choosing to uphold an assumption based on truth or false. No matter which side one chooses to believe; it will cause a conflict (reason) with those who choose to not believe. So believers vs non-believers about truth vs false...all caused by consenting to a suggestion. Now from the perspective of those who offered the suggestion this represents division through suggestion. A nifty tool for mass population control.
It is irrelevant which side you choose to believe/not-believe (true or false); because a) neither exist within flow (constant change) and b) the few who suggest beliefs (-isms) to the many only want the conflict of reason; which represents a conflict in ignorance of reality; defined by those who suggest the fiction...them.
In short...true and false are not natural states (we are within change as form within flow); reason is not a natural conflict (we are in coexistence as energy in motion). The biggest lie is that there's such a thing as truth, and our consent to believe it is; is what allows others to utilize lies (contradiction of believed truth) against us.
Nature doesn't lie; it does not offer false information.
What is the prerequisite for divorce? A marriage license. Now compare who's suggesting the marriage licenses and who's benefiting from the divorces?
Resisting ignorance is always a work in progress.
SEM'ICOLON, noun [semi and colon.] In grammar, and punctuation, the point [; ] the mark of pause to be observed- in reading or speaking, of less duration than the colon, double the duration of the comma, or half the duration of the period.
Enlighten me on how to handle those pesky things...
I'm ONE within ALL; not the product of a twice divorced so called jewish criminal; pretending to be German; while propagating transhumanism onto mankind.
super gay
SUPER, a Latin preposition, Gr. signifies above, over, excess.
GAY, adjective - "merry; airy; jovial; sportive; frolicksome; it denotes more life and animation than cheerful."
super gay shit...
Every form of power generation has downsides. Every form.
Growth/loss as defined by flow upon form; hence life (form) moving from inception to death (flow) having the free will of choice to balance as form within flow, for either self sustenance (need aka growth) or ignorance (want aka loss).
Each of us represents ONE (form) potential of ALL (flow) potentiality.
childish level of debate that occurs around the entire power generation thing.
That's because those debates aka reason (conflict between believe in truth versus false) is what corrupts ONEs (form) comprehension of being within ALL (flow). The few use suggestions (-isms) to trick the many to consent to ignorance of flow by believing in affixed form (beliefs; brands; idols).
They're harvesting our ignored energy; because we choose to ignore to GEN'ERATE, verb transitive [Latin genero. See Gender.] - "to procreate" the offered potentiality of ALL; which in return corrupts ONEs comprehension (potential) of ALL perceived (potentiality).
a blight on the planet
The blight on this plane are those who ignore to fertilize and sustain...that's what's preventing growth.
Animaniacs
Animate denotes order; Maniac denotes chaos. A deliberate contradiction in terms.
"Just for fun we run around the Warner movie lot."...rootless
"They lock us in the tower whenever we get caught"...rooted
"But we break loose and then vamoose"...revolution
"And now you know the plot!"...sleight of hand
Consenting to any side of any suggested -ism puts one in a chain of command under false authority aka the party-line; the mainstream narrative. You choosing to blame them represents submission to the same -ism; but as the opposing side within the conflict of reason (truth vs false).
That conflict (reason) represents division through suggestion (belief), and is what the few are utilizing to control the many.
Narrative control requires suggestion of at least two opposing sides to be able to establish the conflict of reason (truth vs false); which represents division through suggestion.
Consenting to believe the suggested PA (true); allowed the establishment of PAX (false), and this internal division will be fueled until the consenting believer (true) and their opposing non-believer (false) are milked to death.
Thanks for the inspiration.
Did you knew that bad(ro)bot is a j.j. abrams operation with a weinstein as president?