Consenting to any side of any suggested -ism puts one in a chain of command under false authority aka the party-line; the mainstream narrative. You choosing to blame them represents submission to the same -ism; but as the opposing side within the conflict of reason (truth vs false).
That conflict (reason) represents division through suggestion (belief), and is what the few are utilizing to control the many.
SEM'ICOLON, noun [semi and colon.] In grammar, and punctuation, the point [; ] the mark of pause to be observed- in reading or speaking, of less duration than the colon, double the duration of the comma, or half the duration of the period.
Enlighten me on how to handle those pesky things...
I didn't say that you used the semicolon incorrectly, only that I could follow your comment and agree with it until the semicolon. Afterwards, it became somehwat incomprehsnbiel.
I didn't say that you used the semicolon incorrectly
Still no light in the world of semicolons for me...
I could follow your comment and agree with it until the semicolon
False authority; because offer of suggestion was made by free will by ONE, and consented to by the free will of another ONE. Those who consent are submitting to the free will of the other; while ignoring their own free will for it. Free will of choice represents ONEs sole authority over self within the balance of ALL (form within flow).
Party-line; because when ONE chooses to consent (by believing) the suggestions of another ONE, then the other gains the power to act in the name of the suggested belief. Upholding any beliefs represents idolatry (affixing form; while ignoring flow). Every ONE who consents to believe any suggestion finds himself in a chain of command under a false authority that acts in the name of an idol to define how all the others are acting when adhering to their beliefs.
Mainstream narrative; because those who offer suggestions (form) are narrating the main stream (flow) for those who believe them (form). Instead of adhering as form to flow; we are tricked to perceive reality through the lens of suggested fiction aka adhering as form to other form; while ignoring flow.
To believe represents choosing to uphold an assumption based on truth or false. No matter which side one chooses to believe; it will cause a conflict (reason) with those who choose to not believe. So believers vs non-believers about truth vs false...all caused by consenting to a suggestion. Now from the perspective of those who offered the suggestion this represents division through suggestion. A nifty tool for mass population control.
It is irrelevant which side you choose to believe/not-believe (true or false); because a) neither exist within flow (constant change) and b) the few who suggest beliefs (-isms) to the many only want the conflict of reason; which represents a conflict in ignorance of reality; defined by those who suggest the fiction...them.
In short...true and false are not natural states (we are within change as form within flow); reason is not a natural conflict (we are in coexistence as energy in motion). The biggest lie is that there's such a thing as truth, and our consent to believe it is; is what allows others to utilize lies (contradiction of believed truth) against us.
Nature doesn't lie; it does not offer false information.
Consenting to any side of any suggested -ism puts one in a chain of command under false authority aka the party-line; the mainstream narrative. You choosing to blame them represents submission to the same -ism; but as the opposing side within the conflict of reason (truth vs false).
That conflict (reason) represents division through suggestion (belief), and is what the few are utilizing to control the many.
I could follow this and agree with it until the first semicolon.
Enlighten me on how to handle those pesky things...
I didn't say that you used the semicolon incorrectly, only that I could follow your comment and agree with it until the semicolon. Afterwards, it became somehwat incomprehsnbiel.
Still no light in the world of semicolons for me...
False authority; because offer of suggestion was made by free will by ONE, and consented to by the free will of another ONE. Those who consent are submitting to the free will of the other; while ignoring their own free will for it. Free will of choice represents ONEs sole authority over self within the balance of ALL (form within flow).
Party-line; because when ONE chooses to consent (by believing) the suggestions of another ONE, then the other gains the power to act in the name of the suggested belief. Upholding any beliefs represents idolatry (affixing form; while ignoring flow). Every ONE who consents to believe any suggestion finds himself in a chain of command under a false authority that acts in the name of an idol to define how all the others are acting when adhering to their beliefs.
Mainstream narrative; because those who offer suggestions (form) are narrating the main stream (flow) for those who believe them (form). Instead of adhering as form to flow; we are tricked to perceive reality through the lens of suggested fiction aka adhering as form to other form; while ignoring flow.
To believe represents choosing to uphold an assumption based on truth or false. No matter which side one chooses to believe; it will cause a conflict (reason) with those who choose to not believe. So believers vs non-believers about truth vs false...all caused by consenting to a suggestion. Now from the perspective of those who offered the suggestion this represents division through suggestion. A nifty tool for mass population control.
It is irrelevant which side you choose to believe/not-believe (true or false); because a) neither exist within flow (constant change) and b) the few who suggest beliefs (-isms) to the many only want the conflict of reason; which represents a conflict in ignorance of reality; defined by those who suggest the fiction...them.
In short...true and false are not natural states (we are within change as form within flow); reason is not a natural conflict (we are in coexistence as energy in motion). The biggest lie is that there's such a thing as truth, and our consent to believe it is; is what allows others to utilize lies (contradiction of believed truth) against us.
Nature doesn't lie; it does not offer false information.