I didn't say that you used the semicolon incorrectly, only that I could follow your comment and agree with it until the semicolon. Afterwards, it became somehwat incomprehsnbiel.
I didn't say that you used the semicolon incorrectly
Still no light in the world of semicolons for me...
I could follow your comment and agree with it until the semicolon
False authority; because offer of suggestion was made by free will by ONE, and consented to by the free will of another ONE. Those who consent are submitting to the free will of the other; while ignoring their own free will for it. Free will of choice represents ONEs sole authority over self within the balance of ALL (form within flow).
Party-line; because when ONE chooses to consent (by believing) the suggestions of another ONE, then the other gains the power to act in the name of the suggested belief. Upholding any beliefs represents idolatry (affixing form; while ignoring flow). Every ONE who consents to believe any suggestion finds himself in a chain of command under a false authority that acts in the name of an idol to define how all the others are acting when adhering to their beliefs.
Mainstream narrative; because those who offer suggestions (form) are narrating the main stream (flow) for those who believe them (form). Instead of adhering as form to flow; we are tricked to perceive reality through the lens of suggested fiction aka adhering as form to other form; while ignoring flow.
To believe represents choosing to uphold an assumption based on truth or false. No matter which side one chooses to believe; it will cause a conflict (reason) with those who choose to not believe. So believers vs non-believers about truth vs false...all caused by consenting to a suggestion. Now from the perspective of those who offered the suggestion this represents division through suggestion. A nifty tool for mass population control.
It is irrelevant which side you choose to believe/not-believe (true or false); because a) neither exist within flow (constant change) and b) the few who suggest beliefs (-isms) to the many only want the conflict of reason; which represents a conflict in ignorance of reality; defined by those who suggest the fiction...them.
In short...true and false are not natural states (we are within change as form within flow); reason is not a natural conflict (we are in coexistence as energy in motion). The biggest lie is that there's such a thing as truth, and our consent to believe it is; is what allows others to utilize lies (contradiction of believed truth) against us.
Nature doesn't lie; it does not offer false information.
SOPH'IST, noun [Latin sophista.] - "a captious or fallacious reasoner".
Reason represents the conflict between truth vs false, and is based on consenting to a suggested belief. I neither consent to suggested information (I adapt to inspiration); nor do I consent to reason (I adhere to implication aka if/then).
faggots
FAG'OT, verb transitive - "to tie together; to bind in a bundle" aka the unity of form within flow...both real unity (self sustenance) and false unity (ignorance under false authority).
just so you know
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists". Each ONE perceives ALL; no ONE fully comprehends ALL, hence us representing ONE potential within ALL potentiality aka form within flow.
Plato
If you can read this...you're still sitting in the cave; still consenting to suggestion.
I didn't say that you used the semicolon incorrectly, only that I could follow your comment and agree with it until the semicolon. Afterwards, it became somehwat incomprehsnbiel.
Still no light in the world of semicolons for me...
False authority; because offer of suggestion was made by free will by ONE, and consented to by the free will of another ONE. Those who consent are submitting to the free will of the other; while ignoring their own free will for it. Free will of choice represents ONEs sole authority over self within the balance of ALL (form within flow).
Party-line; because when ONE chooses to consent (by believing) the suggestions of another ONE, then the other gains the power to act in the name of the suggested belief. Upholding any beliefs represents idolatry (affixing form; while ignoring flow). Every ONE who consents to believe any suggestion finds himself in a chain of command under a false authority that acts in the name of an idol to define how all the others are acting when adhering to their beliefs.
Mainstream narrative; because those who offer suggestions (form) are narrating the main stream (flow) for those who believe them (form). Instead of adhering as form to flow; we are tricked to perceive reality through the lens of suggested fiction aka adhering as form to other form; while ignoring flow.
To believe represents choosing to uphold an assumption based on truth or false. No matter which side one chooses to believe; it will cause a conflict (reason) with those who choose to not believe. So believers vs non-believers about truth vs false...all caused by consenting to a suggestion. Now from the perspective of those who offered the suggestion this represents division through suggestion. A nifty tool for mass population control.
It is irrelevant which side you choose to believe/not-believe (true or false); because a) neither exist within flow (constant change) and b) the few who suggest beliefs (-isms) to the many only want the conflict of reason; which represents a conflict in ignorance of reality; defined by those who suggest the fiction...them.
In short...true and false are not natural states (we are within change as form within flow); reason is not a natural conflict (we are in coexistence as energy in motion). The biggest lie is that there's such a thing as truth, and our consent to believe it is; is what allows others to utilize lies (contradiction of believed truth) against us.
Nature doesn't lie; it does not offer false information.
Reason represents the conflict between truth vs false, and is based on consenting to a suggested belief. I neither consent to suggested information (I adapt to inspiration); nor do I consent to reason (I adhere to implication aka if/then).
FAG'OT, verb transitive - "to tie together; to bind in a bundle" aka the unity of form within flow...both real unity (self sustenance) and false unity (ignorance under false authority).
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists". Each ONE perceives ALL; no ONE fully comprehends ALL, hence us representing ONE potential within ALL potentiality aka form within flow.
If you can read this...you're still sitting in the cave; still consenting to suggestion.