I'm not a big believer in the whole "you have nothing to fear if you have nothing to hide" mindset, but it does make me curious what potential leak would threaten him.
Either way, I'm glad the Stasi is being exposed, but I hope it doesn't destroy Tucker.
On another note, The Expanse started from an incredibly woke possible premise, but just told its story without a lot of forced wokeness. It's there in spots, but not in a Netflix "Holden needs to peg Kamal every other episode" sort of way. That one has been fairly refreshing.
Censorship is bad as long as people are decent. We're in weird territory right now.
It's all fine and good to think that the merits against pedophilia will outweigh the merits for, but that's barely our reality right now, and it's getting worse all the time. At some point, shitty demography can't sustain liberty.
I stuck it out until they offed the kid. I was mostly rubbernecking at that point. I just got so bad. Honestly, I hadn't really enjoyed the majority of it since S6, but I trudged on in hopes of another Nebraska episode.
My bad.
I was responding to this
Well we didn't fight all the enemies in WWII we should have. If we had bombed Russia like von Neumann wanted, then the whole sweep of Communism and all those deaths and war might have been avoided since Mao would have known we meant business, so yeah, time to walk away and let Chiang Kai-shek have the country back. Wimps like Eisenhower don't have the stomach or the intelligence to do what needs to be done.
With this
Fair, but we followed an interventionist path, rather than a conquest path. That's my ultimate issue here. I'm okay with conquest, but I despise half hearted victory. Since WW2, we've followed a path of "just enough" but it's never really been enough. If it's not enough, it shouldn't be engaged with at all.
Leftists are pedos because they're socially isolated and seek validation. A young, moldable person is the ideal, because they have difficulty finding peers that will fulfill their unrealistic needs. They're broken at their core, but they perceive it as a broken society.
Again, comment depth exceeded.
Fair, but we followed an interventionist path, rather than a conquest path. That's my ultimate issue here. I'm okay with conquest, but I despise half hearted victory. Since WW2, we've followed a path of "just enough" but it's never really been enough. If it's not enough, it shouldn't be engaged with at all.
Comment threads can't go deeper, so I'm moving it up one.
What's the story of WWII?
Fought the wrong enemy, mostly. On the Japanese front, we went Total War on their ass, and made a fairly permanent ally. On the German front, we went "allied victory" on their ass, and paved the way for the Stasi. Also enabled the Russian rape of East Germany, permanently stunting their IQ. Pretty sad, all in all.
For the Persians, our intervention destabilized it in the first place. Poor foreign policy created an enemy.
I am willing to defend freedom and liberty everywhere. I would love to see us topple the Iranian regime since the young people of Iran hate it too. I am not a non-interventionist like that.
You're obviously not a non-interventionist at all, and you drank too much neo-con flavor-aid.
No idea what EFAP is, but they can argue any position, and never give ground. It's old knowledge.