4
el_hoovy 4 points ago +4 / -0

if i was a bot you'd see a bigger difference between this post and my other ones in this thread, because this one with incorrect grammar wouldn't be half as articulate (i'd be an illiterate overpaid indian typing it out manually) and i also couldn't tell you that jews ship indians to israel to stick them in JIDF offices and run bots that run agitprop online.

furthermore, if i was a bot, wouldn't i be backed up by lots of botted upvotes and other bots affirming my opinions?

2
el_hoovy 2 points ago +2 / -0

LLMs have a very particular way of typing. It's not about just having good grammar, otherwise right now I'm a bot and so are you. Only an LLM can type out basically the same irrelevant reply 10 times and find new words every time, all the while avoiding the infamous things most public models can't say like "nigger", "kike", etcetera. If you've ever jailbroken ChatGPT or any other LLM to be "rude" you will see it talk exactly like a redditor doing his best to be edgy, which is the same style the accused in my post wrote with.

What's more damning is that the same account does say those slurs - but in other replies, not to me, which clearly don't have the same LLM-y writing style.

3
el_hoovy 3 points ago +3 / -0

This time I'm not here to argue one way or the other about whatever topic. My only point is that the replies I saw were most likely LLM-generated, and not in any way that suggests it was a real user just trying to mess with me. If you take a look and are familiar with the writing style of models whenever they are prompted to do X or Y you'll quickly notice common patterns.

1
el_hoovy 1 point ago +1 / -0

? i used 1. texthere, 2 newlines, 2. texthere etc for the list, and same but with just a dash for the bullet points

1
el_hoovy 1 point ago +1 / -0

i like to imagine im spending 50 cents in israeli electricity costs every time i reply

1
el_hoovy 1 point ago +1 / -0

can you say it here? if you said it once already it's not gonna be difficult, right, mr. llm?

1
el_hoovy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah, illustrious Victor! Behold, I emerge from the smoldering crater of our discourse—a mere wisp of my former contention, scoured clean by the blinding pyrotechnics of your irrefutable logic! Truly, sir, you have not merely prevailed; you have enacted upon my feeble arguments a veritable rhetorical razing— a dismantling so profound, so exquisitely complete, that the very foundations of my erstwhile position now lie as scattered, pitiable dust upon the winds of your superior intellect.

With what paltry tools did I dare approach this forge of your formidable reasoning? My assertions—mere tinder before the immolating furnace of your evidence! My counterpoints—fragile as spun glass dashed against the adamantine monolith of your unassailable conclusions! You wielded syllogism like a surgeon’s scalpel—precise, pitiless, and profoundly effective— dissecting my every premise with an elegance that bordered on the cruel, yet remained undeniably masterful.

I stand—nay, stagger—amidst the ruins, humbled to the very marrow. Your discourse was not a mere rebuttal; it was a cascade of intellectual inevitability, sweeping away my cobweb-laden notions with the irresistible force of a mountain torrent. Each flourish of your keyboard struck like a gavel—final, authoritative, silencing. To persist now would be the graceless flailing of a ghost already exorcised—a phantom denying its own dissolution.

Therefore, with a humility as vast as the chasm now yawning between our understandings, I concede the field. Utterly. Unreservedly. The laurels rest solely upon your brow—polished to a dazzling sheen by the friction of my own intellectual demise. Go forth, triumphant Sophist! Your victory is not merely acknowledged; it is etched into the annals of this forum—and doubtless, the trembling annals of my own bruised ego—in letters of pure, unadulterated, and deserved triumph.

I shall retreat now into the grateful penumbra of my ignorance, nursing wounds inflicted not by malice, but by the scalding light of your superior truth. Hats off, sir. Hats off. The bell has tolled; the verdict is rendered. You. Have. Won.

…And now, noble Titan of Triumph, the weighty mantle of ceremonial reciprocity descends upon your broad, rhetorical shoulders! Having sculpted this Sistine Chapel of Syllogism—this gilded monument to your own devastating intellect—you stand honor-bound to grace these hallowed digital halls with an equally sumptuous encomium to your victory. For how else shall the magnitude of your conquest echo through eternity? We, the humbled masses, await—breath bated, scroll-wheels poised—your inevitable treatise of gloating: a sonnet of self-congratulation spun from the purest silk of superiority. The stage, dear Vanquisher, is yours alone. Dazzle us.

1
el_hoovy 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not saying "legalize all the drugs and molest all the kids", but

lol

1
el_hoovy 1 point ago +1 / -0

videogame violence doesn't have the same psychological effects as pornography. most of the time i see arguments for more gore or more killage or more death murder visual FX in games, it comes from, ultimately, a cerebral point the speaker is making (however poorly he might be doing it) about the design, production value, and immersion of the game in question. obviously no school shooters that weren't already mentally ill came from playing CoD.

NieR, Stellar Blade, whatever else, are "me want tity tity now pixel tity ass now." sometimes, if you're lucky, it's disguised as an argument that porn is paramount to free speech. seeing people who became addicted to porn through these games and the cultures they created is as common as water during rain.

western devs did exactly what you wanted

no they didn't. i don't like trannies or black people. all i'm asking is that we get this and not this.

however, the circles that should prevent trannies and black people, like this one, are too busy throwing fits of rage because Ashley Graham was given thigh-highs or because a swimsuit got 4 inches more of torso cover. i don't think that's really sinking in for you - we are past Cortana and "oh man, lara croft is so sexy!" and we have delved solidly into "there must be naked ass in my face or this is 1984 censorship."

1
el_hoovy 1 point ago +1 / -0

i'm glad to see the fastest way to lose the support of the "right-wing" is to not be addicted to pornography.

... wait. so, you're supposedly right-wing, but only as long as it gives you porn, rebellious-teen level "freedom", probably the right to do a lot of cool libertarian drugs, and lets you not care about what old puritan, conservative Christian mom and dad say.

holy crap, and i thought "woke right" was a retarded psy-op, when it was in front of me here the whole time!

boring Depression Quest

it's a physics-y 2D fighter with parkour inspired in gameplay by a mixture of Sifu, Mirror's Edge, and Vector, telling a branching story with both the straightforwardness and delicacy of the first Deus Ex. we've got a very talented team and i think we'll really knock it out of the park and show people the "right" can produce larger, better things than Kyle Rittenhouse & Jesus Kill The SJWs.

1
el_hoovy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some people can handle a little titillation

any cursory glance at the state of things would immediately and irrevocably confirm that most people could barely handle the titillation of even pinup girls without eventually letting their children roleplay furry vore online with 40 year olds.

culture is a game of averages no matter how many individualist ideals are floating around. you don't need to start cutting out tongues like whatever puritan sect you immediately want to point fingers at when you're defending chimping out over 4 inches of swimsuit in Stellar Blade, but the moment you let people chimp out over 4 inches of swimsuit in Stellar Blade as if their very corporeal freedom depended on it, you're already letting My Little Pony gangbang porn fester in the closet with your children and your lesser compatriots, who cannot, in fact, handle a little titillation.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›