2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

So it's kleptomania?

Even if you're intent on stealing for the sake of stealing, at what point does "pull out a gun to try to kill the shop owner" seem like a good idea to you?

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait, so actual teens? I see you can just enter Icon Park, so I guess it's no wonder that it becomes a mess.

Dare I ask what the point is of what they're doing? Why would they be aiming at Universal or Disney?

4
AntonioOfVenice 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ah, I got very confused - I thought it was about the Holocaust.

Some Canadians of this very board (legit, good people) once got upset with me because I said that residential schools in my view were good. Regardless of some abuses, they helped integrate Indians into modern society. Although that sounds less good now that 'modernity' has shown itself to be so rotten, but it looked and was good at the time.

5
AntonioOfVenice 5 points ago +5 / -0

Abolish the police, unironically.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

You've been stabbed?

Nothing gets past you guys.

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +3 / -0

A country where a murderer can accuse his victim of "racial abuse" is fundamentally broken. Then again, this is a country where a grooming gang leader accused one of his victims of the same and got HER prosecuted.

You guys believe me now when I say that England is the worst country in Europe? Not talking to you, Haterjuiced.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

The media wouldn't report if the parents criticized their precious 3rd worlders.

Except to smear them...

Father of Henry Nowak posts outrageous racist comments. Maybe there was something to the claim of 'racial abuse'?

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +3 / -0

It seems like it's the absence of fathers that produces chimpanzees.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just once, they've talked about it multiple times yes.

They've bragged about it, and then complained about the activities of the Iranian navy. Ironic, isn't it?

That's enough for you to pretend they still have a navy & air force? Ok then! "Not 100% destroyed, only 97%." how's that?

No, I insist that 160% of the Iranian navy has been destroyed. After all, they destroyed 100%, and then they continued destroying a whole lot afterwards.

I thought you said there were NO chemical weapons in Iraq?

Your problem was the "thinking" part. The US gave chemical weapons in Iraq. They were destroyed in 1991. So you call France "heartless" for trading with Saddam, while supporting the US sending chemical weapons to Saddam which he used on civilians. THAT is what explains why your people produced the likes of Ivan the Terrible. Not Grozniy, just terrible.

Canada had C-camp guards in Poland in WW2? Fucking retard.

Canada? Try your real country.

13
AntonioOfVenice 13 points ago +13 / -0

Disclaimer: I just heard about this case 3 minutes ago.

The defense didn't argue "he shot the kid because he stole a few water bottles". It argued that after chasing the thief, he threatened the store owner and his son with a gun. The prosecution admitted that he had a gun on him, but said he never threatened anyone with it.

It's mind-boggling that someone would throw his life away over a few water bottles. And why take something that isn't yours to begin with (except Venezuelan oil of course)?

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

The US hasn't "obliterated" anything yet, except their air force & navy.

Yes, multiple times.

The threat is that the US will destroy bridges & oil facilities,

You mean even more war crimes in violation of treaties it has signed? Then again, your ethnicity is big on war crimes and extermination camps.

Once they do that? There's no turning back.

Yeah, it means you don't get to profit from Middle Eastern oil anymore, because all the oil facilities will be blown up.

Look up "embargo" eh?

Dear God, you're stupid. Look up "piracy", you moron.

Yes, according to Iran & Venezuela the USA is engaged in piracy and stuff. So?

You were pontificating about how "ships of innocent nations" are targeted by Iran. Even though that is exactly what the US whose boots you lick does in international waters, not even its own territorial waters as Iran does.

It's like when you called France "heartless" for trading with Saddam Hussein, before approving of and supporting the Epstein Empire sending chemical weapons to Saddam which he used on Iranian and Kurdish civilians. It's really no wonder why so many concentration camp guards were drawn from your non-country.

27
AntonioOfVenice 27 points ago +27 / -0

Israel was also bombing Gaza and Lebanon after fake 'ceasefires' there. They don't abide by treaties.

18
AntonioOfVenice 18 points ago +18 / -0

Nothing says 'America first' like burning every last bit of your political capital for the cause of the woman who gave you $250 million and offered the same amount for your third term.

4
AntonioOfVenice 4 points ago +4 / -0

No inconsistency detected. UK politicians don't care about the UK. They care about Israel.

6
AntonioOfVenice 6 points ago +6 / -0

But... they're only sending DEFENSIVE weapons for free. Like what Macron did... giving a bank robber a bulletproof vest. You call that Zogged? You probably deny that Kamala is Kween too...

13
AntonioOfVenice 13 points ago +13 / -0

They're getting the UN to openly back Iran so the USA can tell them to go pound sand & defund them. (And kick them out of NYC!)

Trust the plan! They only look like total bumbling idiots who can't do anything right.

total obliteration will follow

Again!?!? Wasn't being TOTALLY OBLITERATED 5 times and defeated 300 times enough for Iran?

except the threat of sinking the ships of innocent nations.

Well, our Ukrainian Ulpian told me that it's "piracy" for Venezuela to export its own oil, because... it's in violation of US laws. Aren't these ships violating Iranian law and thus engaging in... PIRACY???

while the (powerful) USA/Israel destroys them?

I like how the US ran out of munition in a fight with a third-rate power with basically no air defenses. The POWERFUL US will destroy Iran... in three years when the munitions spent in the previous 5 week conflict have been replenished.

Hopefully.

PrayForTheDeepState

15
AntonioOfVenice 15 points ago +15 / -0

They want the money, so they're still going to be controlled by Israel - rather, the donors, the deep state, etc. - they'll just make some cosmetic changes to persuade their base that they're not.

12
AntonioOfVenice 12 points ago +12 / -0

Iran is unlawfully, illegally and criminally disallowing passage of ships through its territorial waters. So the Epstein Administration believes in international law now? What a clown car.

Also, Germany said that international law doesn't apply to Iran. So even if it were violating international law, it has permission from the weltfuhrer.

22
AntonioOfVenice 22 points ago +22 / -0

If there's one thing he guaranteed by attacking Iran, it's that he will never be prosecuted for treason, or at all. That only happens to people who defend the national interest.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›