ESG is sold as the future of investments etc... and they do a good job selling it. Japan's leaders aren't on western forums discussion woke-ism and feminism etc... Japan's leaders have no clue what they truly signed into. They just see some rich Americans and Jews in suits telling them this is what they should do and they bought it. Silly Japanese people. You'd think they'd have learned not to trust the west on these things.
I talked to an 18yo guy about a year ago about this kind of stuff. He told me in his school, the LGBTQ+ people were essentially given extra "regard" by the teachers on everything such that they were essentially regarded as a "special class". Since all the girls are easily swept up into the "oppression", "struggling" "white supremacy" narrative and women like to follow the rules or are easily swayed by stronger authorities (special classes), all the girls in high school would be friends with the LGBTQ+ group or at least always come to their defense on things. This meant if you were a guy and trying to sleep with a girl then you needed to also be in good with the LGBTQ+ groups because if you weren't in good with them then they'd blacklist you and girls wouldn't want to be seen as friends with you because it would ruin their reputation.
So in short, the LGBTQ+ group in schools are actually the gate keepers to getting laid. That means a lot of guys are immediately attracted to being in the group or in good terms with the group as a means of getting laid. This starts to die down passed high school and first 2 years of university, when cliques and possies matter a whole lot less.
Basically, what you might actually see happen is a decrease in the numbers for Gen Zs who align LGBTQ+ as times goes on because a lot of women are doing it to enhance their reputation for better male simping prospects and social status and men are doing it to get laid.
It's pretty sad that LGBTQ+ are the gatekeepers for sex in schools but that appears to be the case. Shouldn't be surprising since LGBTQ+ is all about grooming kids for sex.
If you've ever met a black woman, you'd think the men and women were the same.
I'm actually not sure what the purpose of this is. All this will accomplish is increase the supply of Rubles to ensure a price ceiling for the value of the Ruble. Anytime the Rubles value increases, relative to other currencies, people will buy gold, sell to central bank for Rubles and then sell Rubles increasing the supply of Rubles and ensuring the value of Rubles doesn't go up too high.
The only possible explanation I can think of this is that Russia expects the change to requiring O&G to be paid for in Rubles will drive the value of the Ruble up significantly which may hurt exports so this is to cap the value of the Ruble. This should hurt imports and help exports presuming countries buy from Russia. Seems like Russia is trying to make themselves less reliant on everyone else and make everyone else more reliant on them.
I'll take any change even if it's worse because any change begets more change. Stagnation is my greatest fear of all.
Correct. The slow boil leaves men blind. If it's more overt, it's difficult to deny.
This sounds great. Bring it.
I already know, I just want others to know so yes I do wish for this.
Truth social is a joke. The rules on it means it'll censor just as bad as any leftist platform.
I wish Incels were the terrorists these governments claim them to be.
This is scripted. Pay it no attention.
I wish this group of men gained more power so perhaps society can change for the better.
Their foreign operations become more valuable but it's more expensive to expand their foreign operations using USD denominated capital. So it depends. Overall, I think for most banks, it's just changing market conditions they can adapt to and it doesn't necessarily spell worse or better prospects on average.
It's pretty obvious what they're trying to do here. Change the definition of happiness such that wokeism makes people happy even though the opposite is true.
This is part of their genocide against men who display masculine behavior. They are trying to kill you all.
Yup. A friend of mine when I was in university used to hang-out at a high school when he would have been 19yo. He ended up dating this 16yo grade 11 student. To this day, she was the hottest girl he has ever been with and ever be with.
I don't know about tech enough to pickup on naunces but I read the announcements and the tweets they linked in their announcements.
If I had to guess. Some white male board member when he was 18-21yo and extremely nerdy socially awkward, fucked some <18yo girl (probably in the 14-17yo+ range). The same girl had given him nudes and/or he had nudes of other <18yo. He go in trouble for it when parents found out but not too major. Life went on.
Guy hit on this Patricia chick at some conference or made some off comment about something to do with her. She decided to ruin the guy and discovered this history of his (perhaps even knew of it because she was from the same area etc...). Decides to fuck the guy over. Most people actually liked the guy so they tried to defend him as best they could. Some people saw the virtue signal as an opportunity to win I stand with woman points and ran with it. Turned into huge drama.
Okay, so what you really believe is that they aren't actually superior, it's that men sabotage men and that's the only reason women have the situation they're in right now. I agree with that. I also believe women are naturally evil. Men are naturally good. And yes, women exploit man's nature to assert their dominance over men, which in itself is evil.
So the only thing women are better at is being evil. It's like a guy who cheats at a video game. Is he better than everyone else? Skill wise, no. Competence wise, no. However, outcome wise shows he's winning so if you only base it on outcome, then yeah he's better but you know that's not what people truly mean.
Women cheat to win but they aren't actually better at anything. Men are superior in all regards but men fall for women's cheats because of the nature that women exploit which makes them evil.
In essence, a woman's only inferiority in regards to women is his naturally weakness to women. Women were designed specifically to hack into this one weakness men were given. If it weren't for this one weakness, women would have nothing over men and women still have nothing over men except this natural hack into man's one weakness which is women.
That doesn't mean women are better than men at anything, it just means men were specifically designed to lose to women because of their nature. If men ever want to win, they have to temper their nature. That's why ancient societies considered good moral men to be men that were able to resist these temptations that women exploit.
If you subscribe to this belief why do you oppose women ruling you? They are clearly smarter, more unified in their resolve and just better than you in every way. By your account we should just let women rule everything. They're better than men. Stop whining and complaining and accept your place.
No, you are wrong. For being a misogynist, you treat women with way too much respect and credibility. They are not equal to men, get that out of your head. Women will never be equal to men, they are inferior in every way.
You think Queens went and fought on wars? You think Queens would have cared who fought and died in her wars, whether it was men or women? Men in power have more incentive to kill off men than women did. Women in power killing off men reduces her labour value. Men in power killing off men reduces his labour value BUT it also enhances his harem because there's more women that need men. Thus you'd think more kings would war than Queens.
You might be right regarding a universal suffrage democracy like our own but again, the leadership of our country doesn't subscribe to democracy. They just brainwash the masses however they want. You think female politicians, female diplomat, female negotiator, female ceo cares? They aren't going to be fighting in the war and they know it. They'll brainwash the masses to have to fight in the war regardless of whatever the democratic vote says.
Neither were the kings fighting. It's not that. I know lots of loser men think "equality" is the name of the game. Put women in the draft etc... The reality is that women behave differently than men and it has nothing to do with being in the draft and fighting. It's their nature. Women are more likely to get into fights because women are not as mature as men when it comes to politics. That's why women do not belong in industry or politics.
There was a study that showed that historically, women are more likely than men to get into wars by a large margin.
They are, after you donate $1000 to their onlyfans, they'll provide services and care for you for an hour.
The man clearly knows nothing about women.
That's not how it works because they aren't preventing fornication because it happens in high school, they're just forcing submission to LGBTQ in order to get laid and most men have been programmed from childhood to base their entire value as a man on their ability to have sex with attractive women so they submit to LGBTQ+ to get laid.
It's not happening the way you want it to happen.
Frankly, what I'm hearing just strengthens my view that men and women should be entirely segregated in society until adulthood and most especially in schools and universities.