8
RondoOBlongo 8 points ago +8 / -0

China isn't a meritocracy, you retard. It's the natural evolution of communism, political promotions depend heavily on political compliance

4
RondoOBlongo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Uh... remember how in 2008 a group of people organically realized bankers, I mean, Wall Street was the problem, they were camping outside and demanded... some kind of change. I repeat, a group of people had a subconscious revulsion to speculators so strong that they decided to movilize, but they didn't have any kind of plan, they were too domesticated, they lived in such a good societal period violence didn't even cross their mind. They couldn't identify causes or the culprits so they demanded change, something, anything, motivated only by a hunch, a hunch so powerful it made them go outside. Their movement was then destroyed from the inside by identity politics. Figures like Ketchup were paraded by Colbert

People were mad the economy was the economy was shit, yet, we had one of the best periods in social relationships, they wanted solutions. Shortly after, msm started pushing divisive race articles, then came feminists, then troons. Opression is the culprit, patriarchy is the culprit. Capitalism is the culprit, but don't touch bankers, don't touch speculators! Suddenly, you were the crazy one if you didn't act like Ketchup and the loonies who killed Occupy were common sense. Collective guilt was 24/7 in the news, on the internet, in Reddit, in Youtube.

Gets the noggin joggin, don't it?

2
RondoOBlongo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now now, judging a king and a peasant from the same country isn't the same as judging two kings from different countries, is it?

5
RondoOBlongo 5 points ago +5 / -0

A better question would be, who normalized the idea that all groups are inherently 'identical'?

9
RondoOBlongo 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yes, that's the core of collectivism. It doesn't matter if one or a hundred africans rape and beat them up, they already decided the "african immigrant" collective identity is morally good. You see individuals and then notice patterns, but for them is simply a dogma

5
RondoOBlongo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Intellectuals often mistake knowing for understanding. It's something we first saw with the age of Enlightenment, and then decades later, with the industrial revolution

1
RondoOBlongo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I love retro gaming, I just wish we got console/hardware replicas or something, since hardware rot is very real. Emulation works 9/10 times, but it really sucks when you get the 1/10...

3
RondoOBlongo 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you mocked white people's hooked noses

>he doesn't know

I don't know anything about body odor tho

1
RondoOBlongo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know, the guy who did it for his furry gay friend came pretty close.

Wait a minute...

11
RondoOBlongo 11 points ago +11 / -0

And drugs, STDs, etc. The left is selling the fantasy that they can get you to escape the consequences of your actions

3
RondoOBlongo 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think he could have frame it better, instead of asking her "favorite" method of abortion, he should have asked which one is the best one according to her expert opinion and why that is. That way she doesn't get to weasel out by claimin "full spectrum of reproductive rights" and if she brings up being humane as criteria ask her why is she being humane to a "clump of cells"

4
RondoOBlongo 4 points ago +4 / -0

10 9/11s? That's almost half a holocaust! Maybe a third of a 10/7!

6
RondoOBlongo 6 points ago +6 / -0

Decadence is a moral and spiritual disease, resulting from too long a period of wealth and power, producing cynicism, decline of religion, pessimism and frivolity. The citizens of such a nation will no longer make an effort to save themselves, because they are not convinced that anything in life is worth saving

  • John Bagot Glubb, The Fate of Empires and Search for Survival

It's all demoralization propaganda

Edit: Spider-man used to be a Randian hero. The point of the character was that by living a righteous life, even if it meant short term sacrifice, you'll eventually build a fulfilling life through self-discipline: Peter marries MJ and finds a balance between his responsibility and his personal fulfillment.

Nowdays spider-man is just glorified martyrdom, they want to make you think being a good person means letting people walk over you, the world will always be unfair to you but you have to suck it up and be happy because "privilege" or something, and a bunch of diverse nobodies (ie Miles, black pregnant Spider-woman, etc) are entitled to leech off your legacy because "It's their turn"

5
RondoOBlongo 5 points ago +5 / -0

It literally is. The father of modern mass media propaganda was Freud's nephew, Edward Bernays.

Universal literacy was supposed to educate the common man to control his environment. Once he could read and write he would have a mind fit to rule. So ran the democratic doctrine. But instead of a mind, universal literacy has given him rubber stamps, rubber stamps inked with advertising slogans, with editorials, with published scientific data, with the trivialities of the tabloids and the platitudes of history, but quite innocent of original thought. Each man's rubber stamps are the duplicates of millions of others, so that when those millions are exposed to the same stimuli, all receive identical imprints. It may seem an exaggeration to say that the American public gets most of its ideas in this wholesale fashion. The mechanism by which ideas are disseminated on a large scale is propaganda, in the broad sense of an organized effort to spread a particular belief or doctrine

He literally thought people were too retarded to participate in society, so it was better to bombard them with propaganda and treat them as cattle. Did you know bacon for breakfast and cigars for women were psyops?

2
RondoOBlongo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actors were useful to normalize behaviours until the internet era, where people realized how utterly vapid and retarded they truly are, and specially during the coof lockdowns. It's all manufactured consensus

15
RondoOBlongo 15 points ago +15 / -0

Yes, this is about the new Charlie vs The Chocolate Factory directed by Taika David Cohen aka Taika Waititi

7
RondoOBlongo 7 points ago +7 / -0

Something something villagers

10
RondoOBlongo 10 points ago +10 / -0

Saar, indians are the real jews, saar. Kindly do the needful or your mother is prostitute

5
RondoOBlongo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Afaik, Capcom is using vtubers to promote the game in the west too, but if there's something worse than a troon to Josh, it's a vtuber

6
RondoOBlongo 6 points ago +6 / -0

I admire jersh's fight for free speech and he's been fucked by corpos and banks over and over again, but he has anime derangement syndrome and can be a retarded a-log about it.

Also, I hate SphereHunter but he pretty much did the same as Maximilian dood, they are self-proclaimed Capcom glazers, giving them free PR for their franchises, now Capcom is giving them PR. Access media sucks, but at least I can understand it, it's not like when e3 had a random brasilian drag queen

18
RondoOBlongo 18 points ago +18 / -0

Barbie is unintentionally one of the most honest feminist media with this speech

No, women don't have to be anything. This is something men have to work hard for too. Women just want recognition and affirmation without doing the work.

Now, to be fair, the speech is adressing issues of modern society but instead of blaming shitlibs, they are blaming men as a collective, that's the real trick. They want independence but they don't want to work for it, they want to be provided for but don't want to be supportive either, they want to have their cake and eat it too, and if it's something impossible they blame men because it's unfair and shit, why isn't that millionare CEO giving them money for existing?

Ken doesn't establish a "patriarchy". Ken establishes what feminists think a patriarchy is. The movie is supposed to be a gender reversal, but it betrays itself because Greta Gerwig realizes the real world "patriarchy" isn't so bad and presenting it in earnest would be more flattering of it than condemn it. And even then...

The last act pivots towards a clumsy message about sisterdom and motherhood, it's just "vibes". And women use it as affirmation because "omg, it's soooo hard to be a woman!"

Even worse, by their logic, Ken is the accessory, a background character whose existence revolves around Barbie and he's reprehended for it. If the genders were flipped feminist wold be crying sexism. Men die but don't mind because their legacy is in transforming the world. Women cry if they don't feel special because their legacy is in plastering their face everywhere

Feminism isn't about equality, it's about emasculating men, putting down men and using men as a scapegoat when things go to shit, because they subconsciously believe, they are biologically wired to believe, it's men's duty to fix shit. Uh, btw. wasn't the message that patriarchy hurts men too? No, the core message is "at least, we, women still control access to sex"

2
RondoOBlongo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Constructionism is the cornerstone of marxism. They believe everything is a social construct, having an external demostrable proof of objective reality completely shatters their theory.

They believe culture shapes people, we believe culture is an extension of people...

view more: Next ›