1
RaceCreatesCulture 1 point ago +1 / -0

How many jews are there in the world? How many Whites are there in the world? You already have a significant numbers advantage, what's the problem?

1
RaceCreatesCulture 1 point ago +1 / -0

How about you cause harm and you don't bring children into this world just so they can be tools for a war you should be fighting not them?

1
RaceCreatesCulture 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's an interesting way to look at your children.

1
RaceCreatesCulture 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's just kicking the can down the road. You're accomplishing nothing. That's cowardly.

1
RaceCreatesCulture 1 point ago +1 / -0

I do hate them but I'm only as ready to throw my life away as you are. Snow me the way first brother.

1
RaceCreatesCulture 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you want me to be your mercenary in a war I don't care about then offer me something in exchange for my sacrifice. Give me your daughter then since you're having kids, otherwise why would I throw away my life for a cause that has no benefit for me?

1
RaceCreatesCulture 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do you think surviving matters? I for one don't. Is this a contest? I sure as hell don't care.

1
RaceCreatesCulture 1 point ago +1 / -0

So why make more slaves and doom your descendents to a life of slavery? If you end all slaves then the masters are ended also. Masters can't exist without slaves.

1
RaceCreatesCulture 1 point ago +1 / -0

What has my race done for me? I'm not the traitor, the rest of my race is.

1
RaceCreatesCulture 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't care about this world so who is remembered or not matters not to me. I hope the White race is entirely destroyed and wiped off the face of the Earth including all its history. Why should I care? I have 0 vested interest in the future and especially when I'm dead.

1
RaceCreatesCulture 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are correct on all points except your personal choice regarding what works best for you isn't necessarily the same for all men. I don't give a rats ass about continuing my genetic line. In fact, I never want my line to continue because if I hate this world then so will my kids. I'm committing genetic suicide because it's the honorable thing to do. I'd rather live the way I am now rather than trying to spite the system and take such a quality of life hit just so I can feel good about saying fuck you to the system but I make $150k/yr by doing fuck all. Other men may find themselves in different positions. If you've got fuck you money then it's better to waste it for your own gain rather than throw it away to prove a point. If you don't have fuck you money then bring the system down.

3
RaceCreatesCulture 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm divorced and she barely got anything. She got about $20k in total.

What you need to understand is that all women are whores, period. Where there's no cash exchanged, there's value being exchanged some other way. Some women are fine with men exchanging their looks, penis and work around the house in exchange for the woman because she knows she's worth relatively little money given how ugly/fat she is but the man isn't getting that pussy for free. He's paying somehow.

So while you're right that in theory no man should xyz regarding women because men should be the ones women are paying for not the other way around, in our current society if men try to transact with women such that women pay for the men then men end up with absolutely nothing. A big fat 0. You either pay women for their vagina or you get nothing. And you get what you pay for at the end of the day. Some guys try to game the system as much as they can but it usually doesn't pan out either because absolutely everything in our society is designed around teaching women how valuable they are and how they can best extract as much as they want from men. Shelter a woman from this and all it takes is a few hours on tiktok for her to have been indoctrinated by society enough to fuck you over and start demanding more payment.

You either pay for a woman's vagina or you get no vagina. That's how our society works.

7
RaceCreatesCulture 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's not even a matter of "stopping the bitch from robbing you via divorce", that's just now part of the whole deal when you sign up for one. Women expect to be able to be given the get out of the relationship for half your stuff card to use whenever they want, otherwise they won't want anything to do with you.

That 50yo rich dude marrying the 18yo girl... You think she's going to be with him for the next 40 years until he dies? Hah, not a chance. He'll maybe get 7 years out of her before the divorce. She'll probably throw a few kids in there for good measure after she talks to a whole team of lawyers and family experts who all know what the best chances are for her to extract as much money from the guy when she leaves, who were coaching her before she even got marriage by putting those thoughts in her head. She'll tell everyone he was abusive and that this only changed after a few years of the marriage whereas before he wasn't like that so there was no way she could tell, boohoo. Same old story all women use that completely forgets to mention how she changed that led to his change in behavior also. It turns out when you go from BJs and sex everyday and "yes daddy, whatever you want" to I'm your equal partner in this equal marriage so you better listen here mister and do what I want, oh and I have a headache, that guys start to change from whatever my princess wants to live up to your end of the bargain bitch.

Anyway, if you aren't getting married expecting your marriage to end then you're doing it wrong it you're marrying a woman so low on the scale of what men like in women that it's going to be you eventually wanting the divorce, not her.

20
RaceCreatesCulture 20 points ago +20 / -0

I think it's getting really bad out there more so than people realize. I'm 36yo and I have refused to "drop out". I just hung out with a woman I've kind of been dating after work today watching the Canada vs. Argentina football game.

I've literally tried absolutely everything and continue trying new things. The latest thing I've been dabbling in is Sugar Daddy/Baby stuff.

Something I've noticed lately that wasn't the case 8 years ago is the sheer volume of single dudes that seem to be bi now and the number of single dudes with female friends. A decade ago, most guys would bail on girls who friend-zoned them and most guys were straight. I feel like the market is so bad for men to get women that men are becoming gay/bi because they have no other option and men that get friend-zoned by women still continue to be friends with the woman because they literally would have no other contact with women if they didn't. That seems to be the impression I'm getting of the situation when I "go out". And I'm out lots. I'm at bars/clubs/house parties like 2-3 times a week and I'm constantly meeting new people and trying new events around the city to meet people.

I imagine if this is what I'm encountering among the men that "go out", there's probably a significant amount of men that don't go out anymore because of how bad it is out there.

This Sugar Daddy/Sugar Baby thing has taught me a lot too. I tried this like maybe 5 years ago and there wasn't really much going on back then. Today though, I am NOT exaggerating but there's more good looking Sugar Babies in my city than there are good looking women on Tinder. I've chatted with Sugar Babies who have Sugar Daddies in Europe that just send them allowance throughout the year and then get the Sugar Babies to come traveling with the guy a few times a year. When all these good looking women have this sort of system going, they aren't looking for serious long-term boyfriends, they're looking for fuck toys to have an orgasm here or there and that's it. This sort of system is completely pulling women entirely off the market. The sheer volume of 18yo girls wanting to be a Sugar Baby is worrying to. It's basically a viable career path for women now. Oh, and from my experience there's a lot of Sugar Babies that are encouraged by their mothers to do it so they "don't need no man" because of a failed marriage.

Last Saturday I was out at a restaurant/bar at a hotel that has the nicest view for miles where lots of weddings take place. I noticed a wedding party where a 50yo dude was marrying what appeared to be an 18yo girl. The wedding car he was driving in was a Ferrari. I think we've honestly hit a peak in society where women have so much value you pretty much have to buy the woman or you get none. You can rent a woman along with like 5 other guys but you're getting uber quality when you rent women. If you want the wife + kids with a decent woman you literally have to buy them. $200k-300k/yr I believe is the going price.

Anyway, my report is that things are significantly worse today than ever before and I think way more men are checked out than most people realize. Obviously, when you're out-and-about you see a lot of bf/gf or husband/wife couples but it's a bias because single people tend to not go out solo. I'm an anomaly in that regard and always have been. Most single guys/girls are sitting at home playing video games or doing something else than going to places where couples often go to.

There's going to be a group of guys that always succeed because of their natural attractiveness but these are your top 10% of men, which may even be the top 5% these days. If you're not in this group, you're out of luck or you have to end up with an ugly/fat woman (which isn't a problem for every guy). If you want a pretty woman with a decent personality and you're not in the top 5% of men, you're out of luck these days so I'd wager something like 50% of men have dropped out entirely, though most men who drop out will get back in the game if the opportunity comes along but most guys don't have much hope in that department.

1
RaceCreatesCulture 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have more respect for women who try to value men based on their ability to get laid than I do men who shame other men on this metric, tbh.

Women have an interest in wanting men to be valued by their ability to get laid because that means women set the value of men not men. Women decide which men they sleep with so if a man's value is only determined by who women choose that means women have full control over which men are valuable and which aren't. Men have 0 say in their own value. Of course women would want men to think their value is based on women. That gives women all the power over men. So I get it when women promote this mindset.

What I can't stand is when simps, masquerading as tough guy fuck boys, think a man's value is based on his ability to get laid because this is draining to all men as a whole and suggests women are what sets a man's value not men themselves. These sex betrayers are the worst kinds of men out there.

1
RaceCreatesCulture 1 point ago +1 / -0

It seems pretty evident to me the plan is to destroy franchises.

2
RaceCreatesCulture 2 points ago +3 / -1

No, it's really not. The problem was always the people acting against our interests. Whether there were slaves here or not, they'd have found a way to bring us down because that was always the goal. They just used what resources they had at their disposal and would have found another way regardless of the slaves or not. It doesn't take much to put everyone back in shackles if we want.

8
RaceCreatesCulture 8 points ago +9 / -1

The normies will never accept that from a non authority. What you need to do is remove the elite controlling the normies and then tell the normies what to think.

5
RaceCreatesCulture 5 points ago +7 / -2

Brah, Whites need to remove non-Whites from interacting with our society except as slaves to enhance our wealth and power.

17
RaceCreatesCulture 17 points ago +17 / -0

This is everywhere not just Seattle. The collapse is all of Western Society.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›