by folx
1
6
Questionable 6 points ago +6 / -0

What's wrong with cross platform censorship? Sir, you are posting in KotakuInAction2. Do you even know why there is a 2 in the name? I'll give you a hint. It's because of Censorship.

by folx
1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

R̷̷̸̺̥̥̜͔͖͚ͅe̴̡͇̠͉̝̞̳͓̠P̡͝o̧͈̘͎̥̖͕͉̗͓̝͖͡rt̯̜̳͈̗̰̕͞ ̻̼͇͇̳͢͜S̟uB̖̠͚̼̖mi͍̙̬̤͍̣͘T̨̞̫̲̮̖̣̬͟T͇̲̗͉͉e̢͕͓̦̙̩̯̞͖̞͕͚d͈̬̺̭̤̪̺̹̞͎̞͍** * Ὸ̴̵̰̖͠ ڵ̵̧͟ Ѡ͕ ͈̼̮‼̦‽̼̣̪̺̰̼͍͓͜ͅ!͕̖͈̤͠ͅ ̶͚̫͍̫͖̼͠ *

R̷̷̸̺̥̥̜͔͖͚ͅe̴̡͇̠͉̝̞̳͓̠P̡͝o̧͈̘͎̥̖͕͉̗͓̝͖͡rt̯̜̳͈̗̰̕͞ ̻̼͇͇̳͢͜S̟uB̖̠͚̼̖mi͍̙̬̤͍̣͘T̨̞̫̲̮̖̣̬͟T͇̲̗͉͉e̢͕͓̦̙̩̯̞͖̞͕͚d͈̬̺̭̤̪̺̹̞͎̞͍** Ὸ̴̵̰̖͠ ڵ̵̧͟ Ѡ͕ ͈̼̮‼̦‽̼̣̪̺̰̼͍͓͜ͅ!͕̖͈̤͠ͅ ̶͚̫͍̫͖̼͠ **

by folx
1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Egh, gads! I am very offended, and am spamming the report button like the delicate little flower that I am.

Look, woman like me aren't very smart. Do you have any suggestions on what I should say while reporting you? You do know yourself better than I do after all. And are so smart and handsome. Tell me what a bad boy you are! Tell me you're a ConPro user!

by folx
1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. Oh my, I am very offended. My panties are all in a twist. I can't believe you said that. Please, stay your hand... or whatever.

by folx
2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

See the Question mark at the end of your 'statement'? That makes it a 'rhetorical Question'. Now you implied that you had a joke to tell, or Quippy come back. Are you honestly telling me, you put yourself out there like that and you've got nothing?

Please. Continue.

by folx
2
Questionable 2 points ago +3 / -1

Oh, do go on.

by folx
3
Questionable 3 points ago +4 / -1

That was all implies, yes. And unless you have some back story to add here, it was a wide gap in logic you just jumped here.

by folx
1
Questionable 1 point ago +2 / -1

Wow. OK.

by folx
5
Questionable 5 points ago +7 / -2

Right, so back pain equates to gender dysphoria, and color revolutions disguised as sexual revolutions in your book?

3
Questionable 3 points ago +4 / -1

Of course they are. It's all up to the moderators and individual website owners. The Question is, should you?

PS: If you want a list of ConPro subscribers, you just named me, add me to your list. As for moderators, it's listed on the right side, just as with all subs.

by folx
8
Questionable 8 points ago +9 / -1

Looks like a breast reduction. Which is not the same things as zipper tits.

https://meaww.com/dolly-parton-heartstrings-breast-reduction-surgery-40-dd-virginia-twins-jolene-butt

2
Questionable 2 points ago +3 / -1

I don't blame the Mother for making such a strange statement. But, who hears that, and says, "that's Quote worthy. This exemplifies the general feelings of the Queens death. I'm going to make a media post on that".

10
Questionable 10 points ago +11 / -1

Only If I am Scott Adams. Checking now.... No, it does not seem I am.

11
Questionable 11 points ago +12 / -1

Seeing as how he was reelected by the people. This makes sense.

6
Questionable 6 points ago +7 / -1

So they waited until the ballots were destroyed before investigating election fraud allegations?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yes. I intentionally made sure it was only 1 letter off the original Quote.

Yet, I am still amazed someone got it.

5
Questionable 5 points ago +6 / -1

I'm also touching base on the concept of "the picture plane". Which allows more abstract images to be accepted on the merits of their concepts, and not their abilities to look realistic.

16
Questionable 16 points ago +18 / -2

I think the more grievous issue, is that of making this live action. Animation is used to help make unrealistic plots and actions more acceptable. It's why the Avatar movie was an uncanny valley of nightmare fuel.

Did the movie Splash work? Yagh sure, for the most part, for a romantic comedy. But you need to show that fish body as little as possible. Because lets face it people, fish people is silly cartoon nonsense. And per usual, this live action remake will in no way stand up to the original.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›