Ofcom didn't suspend her because she praised Hamas. Ofcom is filled to the rafters with hard Left pro-palestinians.
They suspended her because she got caught, and just as she was poised to run Ofcom's own jihad against online freedom of speech in the form of the UK's new Ofcom-promoted Online Safety Act.
In fact, the head of Ofcom just got on television to defend her: https://order-order.com/2023/10/17/ofcoms-head-of-online-safety-defends-suspended-anti-israel-director/
Ofcom, if anyone doesn't know, it the UK media regulator. It is FAMOUSLY biased to the Left. Lately it has been trying to shut down the anodyne but anti-hard-Left GB News, the only anti-Left channel in Britain.
Recent Ofcom scalps from GB News include Mark Steyn for having a vax dissident on, Laurence Fox for saying he would refuse to sleep with a feminist who had laughed on the BBC about male suicide, and Dan Wooton for laughing at Laurence's joke. The Male suicide segment on the BBC to which Fox and Wooton were referring remains, of course, untouched by Ofcom.
For anyone interested in following Ofcom's ongoing assault on GB News (and thereby on the Brexiteer audience's ability to get reasonable news viewing in the UK), Guido Fawkes (order-order.co.uk), to which the OP links, is the best place to read about it as it unfolds. Has one of the best right-leaning reader comment sections anywhere in the UK, by the way.
I'm travelling so much that I'm down to my phone, so I bought a Backbone which broke (stretched out elastic, it seems) within 2 months, then bought a Kishii which has stayed tight to this day.
It's not about persuasion. It's about force.
You forgot murdering.
Soros explicitly said he hopes De Santis will win the Primary.
This is the absolutely perfect anthem for the deeply and fundamentally corrupt people who took out Trump and installed the False 'President' Biden with his "81 million votes" somehow garnered from a basement.
Chef's kiss level of perfection.
Well, not the full Tommy Robinson - he hasn't been repeatedly incarcerated for nothing.
Yet...
This is fucking outrageous.
A meme that is of an impossible thing (riding a rhino) is extremely different from a picture titled "Real Trump" and showing an AI image of an entirely and humanly common thing such as an embrace.
No comparison.
The best bit about all this is that to get a place on one of those boats costs roughly $10,000 in hard cash.
These dinghy riders are richer in cash than the average American, and are still coming to the UK to the tune of 400 a day, specifically in order to pillage the UK's highly taxed Benefits system, originally meant for Britbong poors now left out of the system altogether.
They rape and murder whenever they get the chance, too. Which, I suppose, is an added benefit for them.
"How dare you bigot don't you like curry?" -The Guardian
Fucking liar. The Trump campaign has NEVER published an AI image of De Santis.
NEVER.
That's the kind of thing only YOUR campaign does. No one else does it.
You're just angry I caught you in the original De Simp lie you told - that Kassam/Trump 2024 is behind this article.
You got caught, and now you're not just a pathetic De Simp. You're a pathetic BIG MAD De Simp. Keep seething - it's fun to watch.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/whore
Whore noun [ C ] US /hɔːr/ UK /hɔːr/
Old-fashioned: a female prostitute
Offensive: an offensive word for a woman who is thought to have a lot of sexual partners
A 2004 real estate investment is not evidence that "Soros backs Trump". You intentionally made it sound as if Soros gave to Trump's campaign, not that his investment fund, along with several other investment funds, put up loans to build a building in 2004.
De Simps can't help but mislead, obfuscate and lie. It's all they have.
"Soros funded Trump"? More lies. This is really all you've got, isn't it De Simp? Lies and more lies.
Do you realize how fucking ridiculous you sound?
De Santis' endorsers and donors are a matter of record. Bush and Ryan are on the record. Koch is on the record.
Just be glad I didn't bring up how the Moderna lobbyist showed up at the recent De Santis fundraiser - the one that was held at the offices of the Dominion lawyers.
Yes, really.
Trump will be the nominee, and everybody, including you, and including your bosses at the De Santis campaign, knows it.
But keep taking those sweet, sweet Koch/Bush/Ryan bucks from the De Santis campaign to post here and wherever else you post for him.
You may as well, they pay very handsomely, as far as I understand, and that money won't be flowing for very much longer. Make hay while the sun shines, paid De Simp.
I don't give a fuck what Pedro claims.
YOU claimed that Kassam was the source.
YOU said that, and YOU lied.
The same guy who wrote this piece, MAtthew Boyle, apparently also wrote the "Trump dined with far-right Nick Fuentes" hit piece so beloved of the De Santis campaign.
Most of his recent work is devoted to propping up Pence.
He's not part of Trump 2024 in any way, shape, or form.
Breitbart is not pro Trump. They are pro Israel. What they get out of publishing this piece is to further their previously stated aim of trying to eradicate 'anti-semitism' on the Right.
You said Kassam was THE SOURCE. Not that he was gloating, not that he was sharing it, that he was THE SOURCE for this story, working on behalf of the Trump campaign. Which is entirely untrue and made up by you and the De Santis influencers.
You got caught red-handed in your lie and are now backtracking, but that does not change the fact that YOU LIED.
Again, I direct you to your nearest dictionary.
that tweet from Candace is merely acknowleging reality, as all De Simps will have to do eventually.
Again, making things up about Kassam: "Probably didn't want the blowback". Are you now backtracking on your original lie that Kassam/Bannon was Breitbart's source?
Just admit you made it up out of whole cloth, De Simp. Kassam has his own publication which he is constantly promoting, and he has not spoken to anyone at Breitbart for years now. Bannon has a hugely popular podcast and has not spoken to anyone at Breitbart for years as well. If either was the source for this story, as you claim, they themselves would have published it on their own platforms.
You told more of your usual lies and simply weren't expecting to encounter anyone on here who actually knows the behind the scenes situation between Breitbart and Kassam/Bannon.
You got caught in your lie, De Simp. Just own it, and enjoy your campaign's sinking numbers.
Candace Owens is absolutely NOT a Trump 2024 shill. She dropped MAGA very publicly over a year ago. She does not speak to Trump at all. She's a De Simp like all the other Daily Wire people (except for Knowles).
Again KASSAM IS PERSONA NON GRATA AT BREITBART. He has been for YEARS now.
Kassam has his OWN publication, The National Pulse. Why the FUCK would he leak an explosive story to competitor Breitbart when he could publish it himself first?
De Simps really are astonishingly dishonest people. You all lie SO EASILY. It's second nature to you.
I was in NYC for 9/11, was back in London for 7/7, and was caught up in the near miss that was the 2007 Haymarket car bomb attack meant to level the Tiger Tiger club. That last one was very close to the bone, We were evacuated, shaken badly. We walked home through Picadillly (all tubes and buses were shut down in response) as we walked up heavily Muslim Edgeware Road suddenly there were block after block of screaming muslims in the street, shouting at any non-muslims, punch-drunk with angry happiness. That was a bit of a shock too.
The next day we woke up to find that the very SAME terrorists who nearly killed us had fled in the night up to Scotland and then attacked Glasgow airport. This was the source of the famous image, if you recall, of a Glaswegian man bravely physically attacking one of the terrorists. The terrorist was a fucking NHS doctor. I remember none of us could process that last bit. I remember the mayor of London Ken Livingstone was on Radio 4 telling us that it had nothing to do with Islam, but that Israel was illegitimate, and that was the reason for these "justifiable" attacks. Again we were stunned and completely confused.
The following year I moved to a gorgeous old house in the East End, in Spitalfields, owned by someone who gave it to us at peppercorn rent on the understanding that we would move out as soon as the approved architect was ready to go to work on it, and that in the meantime we would keep "the locals" from stealing the valuable 18th century fireplaces, installations and cornices (they would steal them and then sell them back to the house owners, quite the thing in 2010's Spitalfields) very near ultra-Muslim Brick Lane.
That was the final straw. Living in a Muslim neighborhood as a white was fucking awful. They are the most racist motherfuckers I have ever come across in my life. They kept trying to break into our house through the roof (yes, really) and tried to drive us out of the house because, I was told, they wanted it to house Muslims as it was so near to the Brick Lane Mosque, which was on the corner of my street. They tried to intimidate us out of the house and once shoved shit through the letterbox. Police did absofuckinglutely nothing. We finally gave them what they wanted and left. Near- zero rent was not even sufficiently compensatory for living near Muslims who wanted to harm us.
Cumulative result: I FUCKING HATE ISLAM. I HATE IT. I WANT IT GONE.
So no, I'm not a "Zionist", I am just a normal Londoner who has had first hand experience of what Muslims want for me and my kind. My philosophy forevermore will be FUCK MUSLIMS AND ALL WHO SUPPORT MUSLIMS. I WANT THEM GONE.
Does that answer your question, OP?