"Doesn't deserve to die" has got to be one off my least favorite "logical" arguments. And any of that similar framing; "death sentence," "execution," and the like.
That's not what happened. That's not what happens when a thief or attacker gets gunned down in self defense, either, or any of those scenarios.
It's never about whether they deserved to die, or not. It's about someone putting themselves in a position where a level of force could be used against them defensively that might lead to death.
The point isn't "Neely deserved to die," the point is he put himself in a position where someone was right to restrain him. He wasn't executed, he didn't receive a death sentence, and it doesn't matter if he "deserved" to die or not. And Penny never claimed he deserved to die, and neither did the judge or jury. Neely fucked around, and found out.
Here's the Nitter thread. And the linked article.
They changed a line where the MC says she hates "women who call their boyfriends partner" to hating "women who use pet names for their boyfriends." Allegedly due to sensitivity toward the alphabet people. I can't speak for anyone else, but personally I think it's' more annoying when straight people do it, so that's funny on multiple levels.
Honestly, the censorship is so retarded it's hilarious.
Honestly, absolutely hilarious. I'm against the censorship, of course, but it almost feels like a win in this case; that they were so offended about such a simple line is absolutely amazing.
Censorship is bad, but at least this one is also fucking entertaining.
"Partner" should be reserved for Westerns and pronounced "pardner," and never be used for relationships.
Also, I love when simple opinions (dislike of the term "partner," thinking a video game/movie/show is bad, believing in biological reality, whatever) also get you "phobic" points. You mean I can dislike "partner," and boost hate of the alphabet people at the same time?! Score!
...hottest pictures of Hunter Schafer.
I looked, to see what was being talked about. Failed utterly to find "hot" pictures; alien looking freak. Likely severely abused by his parents in more ways than one, too, going off the wiki timeline. Was "feminine" as a toddler, allegedly. Came out as a gay male...in seventh grade. Started transition in ninth grade.
His parents are either absolute pushover traitors and failures, or actively complicit. They either pushed this, or let social media alphabet agents destroy their son.
Also, sure, he looks more feminine in some shots, with tons of makeup and professional photography. That's not a good thing.
Also, what an absolutely atrocious take (no surprise) from Literally Wu. To use the modern slang, utterly coombrained take. I thought, using progressive logic, the trans stuff was about affirming the individual's identity, not trying to factory produce "hot transwomen" by castrating young boys.
It's all perversion and degradation. Predators get off on twisting society to their absurd whims, and forcing society to conform to the idea that you can be a guy pretending to be a girl, fucking another guy who was abused as a young child and thinks they're a girl...without being "gay." That's a big part of the game; to just rub the absurdity in all of our collective faces.
It is utterly evil.
Fuck!
I have enjoyed Sanderson.
It's weird, too, because if I've got my authors right, I believe he's Mormon, and he got hate for that from the usual retards. So even though he wasn't explicitly anti-woke, he got lumped in on Our Side just because they hate him for his religion.
Real shame to hear he cucked, especially partway through writing a series I enjoy.
If you don't get it, I was making an (extremely fucking clever, !please clap!) joke referencing the SVU GamerGate episode, and cleverly mocking legacy media and their portrayals of videogame-related content.
I am very smart.
On the bright side, I don't see how she doesn't inevitably come out of this megabased eventually.
One word: Woman.
I'm not saying it's impossible, but it's not the most natural direction. Much more likely to wind up a feminist or something. Look at Riley Gaines (who I've never understood why the right loves her), who comes at everything from a 'how can we make this about women's interests' angle. Or J.K. Rowling. When women break from the norm, they either head toward in-group interest (aka feminism), or skip right over megabased and go full ULTRABASED. Often up until they wind up back at feminism, but that's another issue.
Anyway, not saying it can't happen, but I wouldn't personally put money on Caitlin Clark ending up in the megabased category.
Continuously get abused by black people for being white. Bow and scrape to black people.
It's all so tiresome.
Also, disappointing. She had every reason to be very disillusioned, and it would have been hilarious is she came out as megabased. Instead it's the same old nonsense.
It's also obnoxious to see white people be so ashamed, when they dare happen to accel in a more black-dominated field. Strange how it doesn't work the other way. If a black person does well in a white field, that's Good. If a white person does well in a black field...well, time to apologize and promise to uplift...you know, the people who make up the majority of that group, and who usually get the recognition. I don't need white nationalism or anything from these people, but just neutrality. It's okay to be white, after all. Just leave race out of it.
If you think you earned your place through skill, leave it at that, and condemn anyone who dares tries to bring race into it, or to shame your accomplishments because of your skin color. Just say fuck the haters. But they never can. Another example; even before he went retard-woke, Eminem seemed pretty self-conscious and apologetic about existing while white. Come on. If you love sports, or rap, or whatever, and are good enough to compete at the top of the game...just leave it at that.
Yeah, people keep falling for the obvious trap.
There is no solution; we tolerate the current situation, or get fed up enough to leave. Those are the two options.
Dom won't step down. And, if Dom does get more mods, it will be at his choosing, and he's already said he doesn't trust any old timers here, who would be the optimal choice. Dom "hiring" more mods would just make things worse. We've seen the story over and over on Reddit, for example.
Again, as someone who has been extremely critical of both his modding and lack of modding, demanding more mods is not the answer (because he might do that), nor is asking him to step down (because he won't do that.) Again, sadly, the options are tolerate, or leave. I don't like it either, but that's how it is.
it turns out America can REALLY build ships well and have sailors who know how to do damage control
Sad thing is, nowadays with all the DEI and other nonsense, America can barely keep some of the vessels afloat when not under attack. As someone who's always been suspicious of how our military has been utilized by corrupt or incompetent higher ups, this is still incredibly sad to see what has happened to our armed forces. I want an incredibly competent and powerful, and incredibly rarely used military. Instead we seem to have the opposite now.
As I said, it's more his poor presentation that I object to. I have yet to see any evidence that Trump is involved in any way in this (and if I do, I'll condemn him, as I have before when he's made retarded decisions.)
OP is pushing an agenda, and part of that is Trump Bad. If he brings good info, that's one thing. If he half-asses it, that's another thing. I'm not objecting from a place of 'God Emperor Trump is perfect,' or anything, and I've criticized Trump myself, including recently. I just think there's a faction that wants Trump to be bad or fail, so I take issue with the motivation.
Again, show me the evidence and, if convinced, I'll condemn Trump right along with OP (although I do think it's always important to keep in mind that the alternative was Kamala Harris.) I don't know, man, the whole Orange Man Bad thing just seems silly no matter how you slice it...even when he is doing something bad. I'm not saying ignore it, I'm just saying I'm suspicious of people who go really hard on the thing.
Trump's not even President yet. Let's let him cook a bit. For all his faults last time, he was still the best in decades.
Why are you so angry he is pointing out that this is trumps pick?
I'm not "angry," and if I was that wouldn't be the reason. I'm annoyed because OP has been doing nothing but dooming recently, and I'm doubly annoyed because he keeps misinterpreting or misunderstanding very basic things. If he was merely putting forward truth I didn't like, I wouldn't have a problem; I'd welcome it, in fact. I've always defended people putting forward their positions, even if I don't agree with it.
OP is obviously pushing an agenda...and isn't even doing the basic work to do it well. That's pretty lame.
So he doesn't officially appoint the guy, but its still the guy trump is picking to support for the position.
Proof?
Again, I'm not even denying it's possible. It wouldn't even surprise me, it's kind of on-brand. But I've seen zero evidence that Trump was involved in the picking of Brian Mast, or endorsed him in this specific scenario. Again, it's like reading NYT and saying, 'see, the anonymous sources say Orange Man Bad.' Like, sure, maybe he did something wrong...but it would be pure coincidence, because their track record is utter shit. I'm going to need more.
OP is either incorrect/poorly researched, lying his ass off, or simply making his argument very badly. That's what I'm calling out. If OP brought actual evidence that showed he was correct, I'd have nothing to object to; I don't object to the truth. That's not what happened, though.
Posted here four hours ago, and top of the page.
It's possible, but remember what "insider sources" said, and how reliable they were, during his first time. I wouldn't be shocked, sure, but point is OP is dead wrong and, no, Trump did not appoint Mast to anything.
If all OP has is anonymous sources (and he didn't even have that, you had to supply that for him, because he's a lazy shit disturber), it's as credible as citing the Failing New York Times, or something. Possible, yes. Proven, far from it.
I absolutely despise these people.
As they say, this is why we can't have nice things.
It just feels like such an absurd violation, and I'm not even Japanese. I hate to see any society be taken advantage of, and a high trust society is a good thing. Shame to see retarded outsiders gleefully shit on that.
Three things.
-
Stop fucking dooming and shit disturbing. Once or twice is fine, but it's all you've been doing.
-
Fuck this piece of shit, Brian Mast. Absolute scum. Oh, point 2.5 - at least include relevant information in your shit disturbing, like the dude's name.
-
Perhaps most importantly...LOL. You fucked up again, and are just totally wrong. This is a committee Chair. The President doesn't appoint them. It's an elected Party position. How are you so wrong with your outrage bait? Again, I despise this dude, and fuck the Republicans who did this...but it has nothing to do with Trump. And with a second of research you'd know this.
Ugh. Now that's something "no one deserves."