3
Kaarous 3 points ago +3 / -0

Solution, close the borders, send all of them back and then start laughing.

4
Kaarous 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you're happy paying kaffirs tax you are no Christian and that building is no church.

I point and laugh while the desert barbarians of both varieties kill each other.

3
Kaarous 3 points ago +3 / -0

Compliant because they support the most vehemently islamist group in the world and not you know, Christianity.

Yeah. Collaborators might be a better term.

3
Kaarous 3 points ago +3 / -0

I know that's pretty much cope. I know that the tiny few who do exist are compliant kaffirs.

4
Kaarous 4 points ago +4 / -0

How? Oh that's easy.

It was deliberate. We didn't actually win the Cold War, ideologically speaking. We failed to rid ourselves of the enemy within. And they're still stabbing us even now.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
8
Kaarous 8 points ago +8 / -0

Dependence not just commerce. Commerce is fine.

But we import just about everything except food. It's good that we do export food, everyone needs that. It's bad that we crippled our domestic manufacturing capabilities and handed it over to the Red Chinese. Or to Taiwan, same difference these days.

Fragile supply lines are stupid. Self reliance is not.

11
Kaarous 11 points ago +11 / -0

That's why dependence on international shipping is so stupid.

10
Kaarous 10 points ago +12 / -2

I'm sure about it. I've seen them strap bomb loaded backpacks onto little kids, and then tell them if they go hug the Americans that we'll give them candy.

You can never convince me that they care about their own lives.

Besides that, the answer to your question is simple. Their armament can reach shipping in the straights, with incredible cost effectiveness. Even if you invent some kind of high tech thingedy thing that can somehow snipe their rocket infantry before they fire, they don't care. All you've done is kill Omar and maybe destroy one rocket. They have a million more rockets and a million more Omars.

Turns out globalism isn't economically viable.

10
Kaarous 10 points ago +12 / -2

Not Navy but Army.

It's cost effectiveness, combined with the fact that muslims don't care about their own lives.

It costs a tiny fraction to attack of what it costs to defend and counter attack. The Navy's battle doctrine assumes air superiority, but worse assumes infinite resources.

12
Kaarous 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yeah because you aren't actually going out there and killing them or putting a stop to their supplies.

Duh. I thought we were supposed to have a military?

35
Kaarous 35 points ago +35 / -0

As if I needed further confirmation. Next he'll cop to having a vast bribe network for forum moderators.

by Lethn
7
Kaarous 7 points ago +7 / -0

Honestly? Third person games.

Most first person games tend towards being twitchy and that's just not my style. Plus I like to play dress up in games, I enjoy seeing my character.

If I had to choose my favorite first person game is Phasmophobia.

3
Kaarous 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's Vigano's whole point here. Read it and have a look.

18
Kaarous 18 points ago +18 / -0

legitimate successor

The whole obviously being a heretic thing, and advocating satanic postmodernist bullshit, invalidates that whole "legitimate" line of reasoning.

by Lethn
2
Kaarous 2 points ago +2 / -0

Indeed. Endless hilarity, oceans of tears.

by Lethn
3
Kaarous 3 points ago +3 / -0

CODE.

by Lethn
2
Kaarous 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah, I don't really feel like it. Same thing with my Shonen Jump prize cards from my Yu-Gi-Oh days long ago. They might just be useless memories but they're mine. Seems tacky to sell them.

by Lethn
3
Kaarous 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sorry but no, it rots in the hangar.

by Lethn
3
Kaarous 3 points ago +3 / -0

Could be, I "won" Eve a decade ago.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›