A cross I bear around here is to constantly remind folks that "American Conservativism," that is to say neoconservatism, was founded by literal Trotskyites.
Why lie? It's seems silly to deny that she violated Russian law. You can still argue her treatment and conviction were excessive and unfair, without lying about her guilt.
I mean.. You can think it's a stupid law or not, but Grimy confessed to smuggling drugs. FOX is just wrong here. Like usual on anything to do with pharma or foreign relations.
Bitch brought a marijuana vape pen into Russia. I haven't heard anyone dispute this. There's plenty of room to argue that her punishment was unjust (it wasn't) or that she was used as a pawn in geopolitical politics between Russia and the US (she was), but her underlying guilt has never been in question.
Yeah and you can still argue from a moralistic higher ground about the punishment vs the crime, if you want. To just deny the crime itself makes zero sense. I don't understand why they would use such an easily disproved argument.
It doesn't even disprove Riley's argument that Griner is a controversial figure, because of what happened. It's incorrect and doesn't disprove the claim Riley is making.
There is a significant part of the American population that believes laws are unjust because a lot people break them. There are AGs decline to prosecute certain crimes because certain people get arrested for them.
99% of the people who work at Fox News are liberals.
A cross I bear around here is to constantly remind folks that "American Conservativism," that is to say neoconservatism, was founded by literal Trotskyites.
Neocons were jews that wanted war. That's it
you're not wrong, fuck kristol and his evil ilk
Bill Kristolgreenbergstein
But to call oneself a Bolshevik would fill the world with dread, so please don't call me a commie. Call me a conservative instead!
Why lie? It's seems silly to deny that she violated Russian law. You can still argue her treatment and conviction were excessive and unfair, without lying about her guilt.
Their boomer audience want them to act tough toward Russia and Chyna regardless if niggers were breaking legitimate reasonable laws there
Not even that. Is it really excessive and unfair if the dumb bitch actually learned a lesson and hasn’t talked shit to anyone after the incident?
Well at least it's a cogent argument to use with her case. Denying she did it, is just irrational
That dude plead guilty lol.
I mean.. You can think it's a stupid law or not, but Grimy confessed to smuggling drugs. FOX is just wrong here. Like usual on anything to do with pharma or foreign relations.
Bitch brought a marijuana vape pen into Russia. I haven't heard anyone dispute this. There's plenty of room to argue that her punishment was unjust (it wasn't) or that she was used as a pawn in geopolitical politics between Russia and the US (she was), but her underlying guilt has never been in question.
Yeah and you can still argue from a moralistic higher ground about the punishment vs the crime, if you want. To just deny the crime itself makes zero sense. I don't understand why they would use such an easily disproved argument.
It doesn't even disprove Riley's argument that Griner is a controversial figure, because of what happened. It's incorrect and doesn't disprove the claim Riley is making.
There is a significant part of the American population that believes laws are unjust because a lot people break them. There are AGs decline to prosecute certain crimes because certain people get arrested for them.