4
ArchRespawnsAgain 4 points ago +4 / -0

No, I do not wonder. You hate White Nationalism and love Jewish Nationalism because you are a Jew.

There is no "feminist side" of being pro or anti-Israel because there are tons of Zionists feminists.

18
ArchRespawnsAgain 18 points ago +19 / -1

You cheer on the decline of White births while supporting Israel and attacking others for not supporting it despite its pro-natalist subsidies. The race of the births clearly matters to you.

22
ArchRespawnsAgain 22 points ago +23 / -1

You underestimate how important preventing White births is to Imp. I think it's his second highest priority behind supporting Israel.

7
ArchRespawnsAgain 7 points ago +7 / -0

Immigration and economics are intertwined. The Trump campaign is positioning itself to be Iran hawks. That's why they should should the fuck up.

10
ArchRespawnsAgain 10 points ago +10 / -0

I never said to attack young men without children in the first place. The problem they are going to have with the pro family stuff is the Dems can just match it and make that a push issue. The Dems won't budge on immigration though. It's their biggest weakness.

13
ArchRespawnsAgain 13 points ago +13 / -0

Trump's core constituency is the White working class. "Kamala put too many blacks in jail" is going to risk alienating them and fail to compensate in black votes gained.

30
ArchRespawnsAgain 30 points ago +30 / -0

All of them need to shut the fuck up about everything but immigration.

3
ArchRespawnsAgain 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you banned variants of my name, that would have been an imposter. I don't think my first account ever received more than a warning so why would I have a bunch of alts?

1
ArchRespawnsAgain 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are also actual libertarians here to argue with. There are no communists. To argue against communists, we'd have to waste a bunch of time explaining their positions just to refute them. I know that would also devolve into arguing (most likely with libertarians here) about what it is communists even believe.

4
ArchRespawnsAgain 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've only made one new account here. I didn't get "tired of making new accounts." I only lost access to one account. I forgot the password after a long (nearly a year) hiatus. I've never been permabanned here. Thanks for making unsubstantiated attacks on me though.

16
ArchRespawnsAgain 16 points ago +16 / -0

What are White women in charge of?

Ubisoft - nope

Disney - nope (KK answers to Iger)

Marvel - nope and is under Disney anyway

Amazon - nope

Netflix - nope

Warner Brothers - nope

Looking outside of culture and into politics:

President - nope

Majority of Congress - not even close

DHS- nope

DOJ - nope

State Department - nope

I'm not saying there aren't any White women running anything at all, but it's way overblown. The "muh White women" bitching is non-descript, vague and ephemeral for a reason.

4
ArchRespawnsAgain 4 points ago +4 / -0

You're offloading products of liberalism onto women and are failing to interrogate the ideology.

His is a pessimistic view, mine is more optimistic.

No, your views are diametrically are opposed. I think you just project your own grievances with women onto TheImp without paying attention to what he actually says, despite your claims to the contrary.

5
ArchRespawnsAgain 5 points ago +5 / -0

Republicans are liberals.

TheImp characterizes women as inherently evil schemers always plotting the moid genocide in every action they take (except for promoting Zionism for "some" reason). His view is that they are ruthless, cruel, cunning, killing machines. Yours is that they are overly emotional and whimsical. These aren't the same.

4
ArchRespawnsAgain 4 points ago +4 / -0

It might be easier to list topics you don't think are suspicious.

No one is imp-tier psycho here outside of him.

3
ArchRespawnsAgain 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don’t get why you want to talk about that to the neglect of the other means that are being used.

You've completely turned this on its head. Did you forget that this was my comment that spawned this thread?

It's always only the anti-semitism with the concern trolling.

You've been trying to argue in favor of there being a legit concern about anti-semitism in particular this whole time.

6
ArchRespawnsAgain 6 points ago +6 / -0

You're just talking about liberalism and labeling it "the feminine imperative."

Sorry if that makes me sound like Imp, but it's maybe the core part of his thesis that's correct. I

You are actively contradicting TheImp. It seems like almost no one actually reads the bullshit he says, least of all the people who talk about how right he is.

4
ArchRespawnsAgain 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh the forum is being manipulated but not in the way you say. The discussions on Jews and Israel are usually relatively substantive. It's the twitter.jpg of some random women saying dumb shit and definitely true stories that totally happened that is suspicious to me.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›