You're just talking about liberalism and labeling it "the feminine imperative."
Sorry if that makes me sound like Imp, but it's maybe the core part of his thesis that's correct. I
You are actively contradicting TheImp. It seems like almost no one actually reads the bullshit he says, least of all the people who talk about how right he is.
I've talked with Imp a lot and have spent a lot of time in this forum saying "Imp isn't necessarily wrong, but his tact sucks."
That was just the first time I have ever posted saying "yes it probably is women's fault." You said that it isn't feminism but it is liberalism... I say "what is the difference?"
When you have a 20, 30, or even 40 point difference in polling trends between single unmarried childless women, then that becomes the bedrock of the party.
The Democrat Party has become the party of histrionic cat ladies and academics who don't operate within a fact-based world. The liberal agenda is the feminist agenda.
I truly don't know how you reverse this trend without a collapse so spectacular that these powerful feminist voices have truly nothing to offer and start to scurry to whatever perceived "safety" they can find.
TheImp characterizes women as inherently evil schemers always plotting the moid genocide in every action they take (except for promoting Zionism for "some" reason). His view is that they are ruthless, cruel, cunning, killing machines. Yours is that they are overly emotional and whimsical. These aren't the same.
You're offloading products of liberalism onto women and are failing to interrogate the ideology.
His is a pessimistic view, mine is more optimistic.
No, your views are diametrically are opposed. I think you just project your own grievances with women onto TheImp without paying attention to what he actually says, despite your claims to the contrary.
You're just talking about liberalism and labeling it "the feminine imperative."
You are actively contradicting TheImp. It seems like almost no one actually reads the bullshit he says, least of all the people who talk about how right he is.
I've talked with Imp a lot and have spent a lot of time in this forum saying "Imp isn't necessarily wrong, but his tact sucks."
That was just the first time I have ever posted saying "yes it probably is women's fault." You said that it isn't feminism but it is liberalism... I say "what is the difference?"
When you have a 20, 30, or even 40 point difference in polling trends between single unmarried childless women, then that becomes the bedrock of the party.
The Democrat Party has become the party of histrionic cat ladies and academics who don't operate within a fact-based world. The liberal agenda is the feminist agenda.
I truly don't know how you reverse this trend without a collapse so spectacular that these powerful feminist voices have truly nothing to offer and start to scurry to whatever perceived "safety" they can find.
Republicans are liberals.
TheImp characterizes women as inherently evil schemers always plotting the moid genocide in every action they take (except for promoting Zionism for "some" reason). His view is that they are ruthless, cruel, cunning, killing machines. Yours is that they are overly emotional and whimsical. These aren't the same.
I think women are retarded children in adult bodies and need to be treated as such.
Imp thinks they're demons wearing peopleskin who want to eradicate men.
We are not the same.
That's true enough.
But we're saying the same thing. His is a pessimistic view, mine is more optimistic.
The purpose of a system is what it does. And what the liberal system does is dogshit.
You're offloading products of liberalism onto women and are failing to interrogate the ideology.
No, your views are diametrically are opposed. I think you just project your own grievances with women onto TheImp without paying attention to what he actually says, despite your claims to the contrary.
It just shows that women are led by consensus and high status people.
Men are weaker than ever before and women do not follow weak men.