Didn't know there were still Nitters around that worked. 20 posts is still WAY better than the trash you get on Twitter's own website.
I think I've vaguely heard about it, but I never considered it a viable alternative. I used Nitter for archiving threads for a while. But if this is the one I'm thinking about, it only archives the stuff posted by the guy himself, when I am interested in getting the context for replied and the like. That is more useful as ammunition.
I'm thinking more of when they put two sh*t sandwiches before you like Obama and McCain. And whoever you vote for is an endorsement of one over the other. I don't mean when any of the candidates is remotely half-decent.
I like Nevada's system, where you can vote for 'None of the Above'. You can also spoil your ballot, and that is recorded (opponents of Nazi Germany did that in Third Reich-staged elections), but it isn't shown. Imagine if it were: Obama 40% McCain 35% Spoiled 15%. Would be great.
Well, he might have a chance with Helen Keller.
Thanks, that'll help me a lot trying to keep archives.
I knew of the country before I knew of the internet meme...
I've always supported abortion, and I still do. Still, I'm not happy that leftists are ruining the lives of their entirely innocent children, regardless of the high likelihood that these children are the eggs that one day become snakes.
His daughters are mortified.
Not mixing them up. Only their titles maybe. Of course, the 'First Minister' of Scotland is just the Prime Minister (= head of government) with a different title in order to not take away from the splendor of the British Prime Minister.
Apparently, the same is done in Canada, because some Canadian guy once berated me for calling state Prime Ministers that instead of 'Premiers'.
I don't think he would bring you back from the dead, because then you wouldn't be voting Harris.
So you're saying there is a chance!!!
They tried, it seems to me.
The 'Garbage' Hoax. Then trying to cover up Biden calling half his country garbage. Then the Liz Cheney firing squad hoax.
Why would you do stuff like that if you weren't desperate, or at least not willing to take any chances?
Hey, that was my plan for Europe! Stop stealing my plan!
Cause they're the ones who have to live under the Democrats. It's easy to support them when you don't have to step in human feces every time you leave your home.
Not quite, it's more that they have no idea. Imagine for a moment the media shouting 'Orange Man Bad' at you 24/7, and you having no personal experience that it was good under the Orange Man and how horribly bad it is under Mr. Dementia.
You should give even less of a damn about their opinions. In my experience, they are horribly uninformed about what goes on in the US, besides the propaganda they are fed by the media.
No way Scotland is most based.
If the UK is Europe's greatest shithole, and it is, then Scotland is its sewer. They had a Muslim PM who was spitting hatred about how a country that is 98% white has a lot WHHHIIIITE people in positions of power. They let rapists into women's prisons. They criminalize conversations at dinner tables when they say something about troonery that they don't like.
Scotland should not exist. Edward I did nothing wrong.
Banks don't like regulation that hurts them, like Glass-Steagal or however it's spelled. Banks don't care about socialism or right-wing. Banks like what's good for banks.
But their food is so YUMMY! MMMMMMMMM!
Correct. Maybe I'm biased because I'm used to the metric system. But a decimal system seems better to me, at least for measurements, than traditional systems. Anyone who has to work a lot with different scales, like scientists, does use the metric system.
Also it's wishful thinking to believe that any state with a significant hispanic population is gonna go Trump. Arizona will never be a republican state again. Demographics is destiny. Georgia is gonna fraud all the way to dem, again. Pennsylvania is a yankee state so it will go dem.
What's the difference between Pennsylvania and Ohio? The Ohio River is the dividing like between Yankeedom right? I can't say I know exactly where it runs, but given that they are neighbors...
As for Hispanics, Trump improved massively in 2020 over 2016, despite doing much to appeal to blacks and doing next to nothing to appeal to Hispanics.
This is also a good time to remind everyone of the probability of a streak of a given length. An approximation is E=Nqp^k, where E is the "probability", N is the number of trials, or in this case votes, q is the complement of the individual probability (1-p), p is the probability of an individual trial, and k is the streak length in question. For example in a city of 1,000,000, the probability of 100 votes in a row being cast for a given candidate using p=q=0.5 is 1 in 4 x 10^25. It will never happen, at least not without fradulent manipulation.
How do you figure out the sequence of votes?
Thanks, Ghostarchive would be great if it works like that.
And what precisely do you mean with unrolled thread? The one for which you need to reply on Twitter?
You may have, but I didn't mean anyone here - I think Auron MacIntyre has made that argument. Of course, it is very optimistic to think that there is a pendulum.
As far as normal beliefs go, I think on economic matters it is different. The left was a lot more left-wing on economic issues. Now it's just a banker-social activist synthesis.
I really hope you're right. I can think of reasons why you're wrong though. Roe was a pendulum, but what was unthinkable in the 1970s is now the norm, such that ultra-red states are overturning laws that are as restrictive as France's. Perhaps it was always a losing battle for pro-life.
As for transgenderism, that does seem like the forces of sanity are winning back some ground. My pessimistic nature inclines me to think that this is a temporary backlash until complete surrender. We saw the same with same-sex marriage. There was a lot of resistance in the 2000s, but then it just completely collapsed.
This is only an available option to the left. It's beyond obvious at this point. Any right winger thinking he can obtain victory solely by marching through the institutions is retarded.
Yes! Just like 'peaceful protesting' is only an option for them.
I know this isn't what you're saying, but people who blow their top over one or two statements are living in a bygone political era where "messaging" was king rather than a candidate's overall rhetoric and work.
I have no doubt about Trump's personal views on the matter. I'm hoping against hope that Trump's instincts and the views of his supporters will prevail over the neocons and the entrenched interests. Let's see what happens.
He transitioned to a degenerate, not a woman.