Not at all unlikely. But I can also imagine them not doing so. They sometimes use one of their own as sacrificial lambs. Just look at the media campaign to get Joe Biden out in the past few days.
Did you just heckin neglect to include a heckin argument?
My hecking argument was that you're a total joke for shamelessly using Wikipedia as a source. Which is why you want to talk about literally anything except talk about what you have done, which is take seriously Wikipedia.
Not on trial.
Nor able to make a persuasive argument, seems.
Waste some other goy's time.
I mean, all you had to do was say: "yeah, you're right, Wikipedia is a terrible source." Instead, you wasted your own time in an attempt to evade this fact.
But Dom jumped right to “he IS an alt.” Plus, once you look at the user history and realize that Siegfried has a year of consistent history her, the “he’s an alt” theory starts looking sillier.
Looking at Siegfried's history, they don't sound alike, although both are national socialists.
I mean, what’s the reasonable “persuasion” for convincing a guy that’s clearly determined to believe only one thing?
And you figured that, how exactly? It seemed to me that he made the conclusion based on that conversation, not on the entire posting history.
how come you aren’t going “gee, the lack of evidence makes the argument that he’s an alt look unpersuasive”?
Didn't I say that I'm not persuaded?
Stop the presses, SR388-SAX doesn't like me.
you've shown up to argue
Yup, I gave him good advice, which he rejected. Cause he doesn't want a solution, he wants to be mad. Same as you.
your apparent love of being a pious contrarian.
Just a contrarian. But in this case, also in the right.
You act like a jerk and then accuse the responder of being uncivil.
Are you awake? I didn't accuse him of being uncivil to me. I pointed out he's been acting like a lunatic. Not to me. Judging by his responses to me, he would seem sensible. Only seem though.
I assume those 8.3 million rats will eat each other before they scatter.
A disgrace.
Absolute Immunity only goes up to +5 weapons...
...I'll let myself out...
Anti-anti-white is just common sense, and your position is just plain consistency. I mean anti-Jewish.
You're then saying there should be. Talking about what crimes should be subject to the death penalty is perfectly legit.
I just wasted a whole bunch of time looking for that one person to point out that zero multiplied by ANYTHING is still zero.
I found one person in the entire Twitter thread.
Unless I'm wrong and Barack Obama has 1 felony conviction
What's it for? As far as I know it's zero.
her own Abo language group
I can see how amazingly Abo she is. Probably around 1/1024.
Throughout that ABC article are all these absurd examples of why the singular “they/them” fundamentally does not work…
Also a great example of 'Gomeroi' culture, I'm sure of that.
Dr. Amy Thunig is a Gomeroi person who parents and partners on beautiful Awabakal Country
Sorry, can you repeat that in non-Gibberish?
You know the worst thing about idyllic rural France? The French!
Non, monsieur! I feel that most people who don't like 'the French' are really talking about Parisians. And you know what? They're right.
French are awesome. Parisians are awful.
No idea what you're trying to say.
Except the proof needs to come from Dom
This is not a cross-examination. If you want someone to reverse his decision, persuade him.
Only had to deal with them for 3 years.
First one should be OK, because it implies a judicial process, and thus eliminates the possibility of it being spun as incitement to violence.
And why are you telling me this?
Go tell DoM if you are able to do it civilly and normally.
Then you should have sent a private message instead of making a public spectacle.
If you try it that way, and you do not receive a reply or you are dismissed with bad arguments, then you do it like this.
I'm more worried that this other guy will get punished for what you do. He seems normal. And he's also rather calm and measured, quite unlike you, which should be evidence that he's not you - unless you're some sort of criminal mastermind, which you're not.
Dom is the one that needs to provide hard evidence that Siegfried is my alt
That's not how it works. Most alts make it very obvious what they are.
I can attest to not liking it when the KiA moderators accused me of all sorts of things that I didn't do.
But if you're seeking to persuade someone to reverse himself, you might want to use a bit of tact. And I did, with them, and even with the admins. Unless you just want to vent.
Wikipedia (yeah, sry) claims he is a practicing Muslim...
It was contested, not corrected.
Great. Now can you bring this to his attention in a civil and normal way? Because every moderator is just going to ignore you if bring it like "FUCK YOU YOU WORTHLESS PIECE OF SHIT YOU WERE WRONG ABOUT THIS DIE IN A FIRE FAGGOT". As OK, this guy is obviously a lunatic. Even if you're completely right.
Am I claiming that you're his alt? I said you don't sound like him to me, and that I'm not persuaded. You seem to have more emotional continence, even though you were the guy who got banned over what someone else did.