In your defense, you believe a lot of things that aren't true.
How many Allied soldiers do you suppose died because of the irrational insistence on unconditional surrender?
I don't know, you have not established that that insistence was 'irrational'. Whether or not it's correct, you're the first one to connect it to the Rothschilds... who I agree were and are bad people, but they had nothing to do with this or anything.
But England is owned by the Rothschilds, who were very insulted by how the head of the family had been treated
I assume you don't have any evidence for your claims that... the Rothschilds controlled England, as you are providing none.
Germany getting out from under the crippling terms of Versailles would be a minor threat to the hegemony enjoyed by the global superpower called the British Empire.
Germany was a threat to British hegemony even before World War I, which is why first the British and then the Americans entered the war.
I appreciate you trying to spare me stepping into human refuse and getting shot in drive-by's, but I wasn't planning on coming to your country to begin with.
Communism is the enemy of all nations, because they stated goals are worldwide overthrow of nations.
What's the 'overthrow of nations'?
Germans were afraid of communists
Correct, 'Germans' were afraid of communists, like most Europeans.
Communists literally advocate a worldwide revolution and they seek to export Marxism internationally. Read Lenin and Marx
Which works? Also, have you heard of 'socialism in one country'?
how communism could spill over from their country and destroy your own country
And look at what Hitler did, he brought communism right into 1/4 of Germany.
Considering that 'Western civilization' now stands for unlimited immigration, LGBTP and endless war, I'm not sure I want to be compatible with it.
The UK and the rest of the world had no real problem with muslims until relatively recently (2001-ish),
The grooming gangs predated 2001.
In fact, the main issue with muslims (terrorism) is in most ways directly traceable to Western (i.e. zionist) meddling in their affairs starting approximately with the founding of israel but not totally ramping up until their successes with the 9/11 hoax.
Terrorism is a sideshow and only an excuse to take away civil liberties. The fact that Europe is being invaded by ignoramuses is the real issue.
Just to be clear, you actually think that the British refused peace talks because the Germans arrested and released a Rothschild 6 months before they went to war?
No, it's because Germany was making a run at hegemony, and obviously so, which is what Britain has always fought against as an offshore balancer.
Russia was not in existence anymore. It was the USSR, a fundamentally different regime.
Regime type doesn't matter, as any realist IR scholar will tell you. Germany was anti-Russia in 1914 when Russian was tsarist, it was anti-Russia in 1941 when it was communist, and it's anti-Russia now when it's Putinist.
maybe atheist bolsheviks had just slaughtered the Tsar and his family, and started wholesale extermination of the Russian people via the soviet state
Just so I understand your position: you're arguing that Hitler was upset that the communists killed the tsar and his family... who had brought Russia into war against Germany, and that the authors of General Plan Ost were upset about 'the wholesale extermination of the Russian people' that they were planning themselves?
Adolf Hitler was a foreign criminal.
This is the girl who said abolish the police while having private security, right?
Like those Japanese soldiers, he didn't know World War II had ended?
I didn't expect that you would be like that, but some of the people here suggest that Muslims are actually OK - because Muslims hate Jews like they do.
Please explain why it is 'awesome' despite the points I mentioned.
I can understand if you label it as 'barely passable', which is more than you can say of the bloke in the dress, but awesome?
I bet they don't "trust" the Twitter user and that they've never heard of it, but as per usual, they believe what suits them and disbelieve what doesn't.
I couldn't hear all the worm and engine noise over those insufferable accents of Zendaya and Chamelet (who should be stripped of his French last name as he's clearly undeserving of it).
Feminists worry about optics
They do? Can't say I noticed. Their speech is as unpleasant as their faces and body types are to look at.
I have some criticisms of Dune unrelated to Zendaya - and even Zendaya had her moments. Dune 2 at least.
What's up with the races? Why are half of basically Bedouin people black? What's up with 'the fundamentalists in the South'? And what's up with people who supposedly speak a sort of Arabic as their native language having the most obnoxious US-coastal accent?
All in all, I'd give it a passing grade, though just barely. The fact that we label such crap as 'excellent' shows how far our standards have declined. You can watch a run-of-the-mill movie from 20 years ago that is better, like Johnny English, and you don't have wokeness shoved down your throat either.
https://www.threads.net/@vivllainous/post/C-UICLWxey5
I'M NOT A BITCH... I'm a lisping homosexual who cut off his own balls.
The part that says "til [Fat Bastard] finishes Ice and Fire" is redundant.
But as far as I know, the book is OK. That's why they had to twist so many things. However, the whole story is about a "woman's right to the throne", which one may find woke-coded.
The usual anti-woke critics have loved HotD
I don't even mind that they give it their stamp of approval, but the terms they use in approval is quite disturbing. Critical Drinker calls it (or Dune, don't remember) 'excellent', which they most certainly are not. It is just an indication of how far our standards have fallen.
(I don't watch it),
To be fair, you do need to have a very high IQ to refuse to watch House of the Dragon, because it's absolute crap.
And I say that without the slightest irony.
I didn't hear the details, but if that was the reason... oh lord.
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaah... I have bad news. That wasn't the reason. It was just the icing on the sh*t sandwich.
the linked Twitter post identifies the family as jewish
It's not exactly a rare even when the Jew-obsessed label someone as 'Jewish'.
Bruh that's some neo-Stalinist revisionist bullshit you're peddlingc
Bruh, it was actually Stalin who promoted a separate Ukrainian culture in the hopes of appealing to the 'Ukrainians' that he thought were occupied by Poland. Know your history, my man.
Ukrainians are still a real people.
I guess it depends on what you label as a 'real people'. But they're not known a Little Russians for no reason.
I wanted to correct you, but if I understand this correctly, you're saying that the female Slavic mayor was the one who put up the groomer flag. Which would be correct.
“There’s a sense of betrayal,” said the former Hamtramck mayor Karen Majewski, who is Polish American. “We supported you when you were threatened, and now our rights are threatened, and you’re the one doing the threatening.”
Eh, they can't. There was a massive Muslim protest over the LGBTP grooming that was put down by the regime in the UK.
Guess who came up with General Relativity. You should boycott da Joooz by refusing to use GPS, which relies on it...